You have no choice in whether you have a medical condition that would have made you exempt, but exemption is no longer relevant in England as face coverings are not mandated, some businesses are becoming a law to themselves, what if a business had a sign banning the wearing of a Hijab in their premises? I personally am not fond of them however I respect a Muslim womans right to choose to wear one or not wear one, where do we draw the line?
|
.
Partially true for some who want to be in control, but often I like to be in control of a situation, doesn't make me the next Kim Jong Un
How is masks a topic over which people are wishing others ill? I don't necessarily agree with their stance and that is why I am allowed to not go into the shop. However she has given reasoning and you should in turn respond with reasoning. For example I am a remainer but I don't say 'I hope all brexiteers are locked up or deported and there lives fail because they have a different stance'. For that is what it is, a different stance.
Because I want a bed for the night and don't care whether I have to wear a piece of cloth however useless. If they are stopping exempt people then that's a different matter...
Caution is only doing things that have a clear evidence base and cost benefit analysis.
Not sure what this means.
Another false equivalence argument.
It could be about anything really; any business that makes people so unwelcome doesn't deserve custom.
What reasoning do you want me to come up with? As a customer if any supplier is being unreasonable and/or rude and/or onerous I will take my business elsewhere
That's another false equivalence.
Everyone is now exempt in England whether you like it or not.
Hour point makes no sense.
Nope; a desire to be cautious would be an individual choosing to wear an FFP3 mask.
Standard face coverings are flimsy, loose fitting and do not protect against virus transmission.
Another false equivalence argument, however a any such business these days is unlikely to do good trade unless it's target audience is very exclusive. This isn't comparable to transportation, shops etc.
It isn't even a step towards it, there is no legal mandate to wear masks. Businesses can request it but cannot enforce it, that is the long and short of it. It is not for you or them to determine if they might have had an exemption even if they were mandated. And I'm sure nobody wants your sympathy in all of this.
Yes I remember, in most peoples eyes it was seen as discrimination.... you've kind of proved my point quoting that
You yourself used the words authoritarian. North korea is authoritarian and therfore kim jong un is. You also called people who enforced wearing masks authoritarian, therefore comparing Kim jong un and mask enforcers is not false going off what you say. If you don't think enforcing masks is the same as oppressive ruling a country then don't use that word. If you are talking about another meaning of authoritarian then please specify.
That is different from wishing someone to go bust. You should have said that earlier
Have you been there? If not how do you know lf it's welcome or not.
No. Your quote was
Clearly because of what she did. An equivalence is:
Is that fair? No I don't think so just like I don't think it's fair for you to say ' I hope she goes bust because she thinks everyone in her shop should wear masks etc. ' (With the added affect on the community). To be clear I do not hold the above opinion
An arrow. I'll be more clear next time.
Did you read what I wrote or are do you really think it is reasonable for a business that takes my money on a non refundable stay and agrees one thing and then attempts to boss me about by mandating something else when I get to the hotel?
You can see the massive loophole here can't you....???
I love this naive idea that all clubs had a dress code, so quaint but still made of straw.
Interesting that most places with those sorts of rules have either changed them or gone out out business...
It was true of some from that era, but far from all. And it was the ones that wanted to look reputable, they were often the worst places to go if you wanted to avoid trouble. But all that is beside the point, dress codes were am attempt to project image, not pretend to "save lives".
It was mainly provincial little clubs; if you went to London there tended to be none of that rubbish.
though it seems my hotel observation was what started this current chain of posts.None of the Premier Inns that I've visited recently have had any interest in masks. None of the staff have been wearing them. Self service breakfast is back, plastic screens between tables have gone.
