Recent content by GRALISTAIR

East Ham

Stevenage

Chorley

68015-03004 -05001= 60010

Yes

They will not allow bimetallic aka galvanic couples on this project. One assumes they have learned from the mistakes. A lot more free flow of air in this location too. So will not have the same issues.

And in all probability a change in government.

Great action shot!

Seems not. If you wanted to electrify a key route from Southampton port to the midlands that would be the place to start.

To me the biggest frustration of all - and not just in connection with railways.

I totally agree. Overseas contributor myself too. I love this site. Been a member for 12 years now. 10/10

The biggest improvement would be: to stop striving for profitability - certainly try and minimize subsidy. Treat the railways as a service for your citizens and improve quality of life with fewer vehicles on the road. Have a "guiding mind" and less DfT, RDG, HMT interference Have a long term...

Very frustrating - probably wont happen in my lifetime now. In this scheme that is not a huge disappointment to be honest. Good - great news more freight by rail. Bad -yet another change to scope which causes cost rises and delays. Mainly good I suppose -but again, changes to scope cost time...

Haltwhistle

London Euston