• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Southeastern Maidstone - Blackfriars 2022.

Status
Not open for further replies.

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
No not bitter at all again with the assumptions and personal attacks

Why would anyone go all the way to New Cross for a ELL service to Whitechapel, when in a few months time, they can simply go to to Abbey Wood or Woolwich CrossRail and reach Whitechapel within a few minutes, this may the case for Lewisham, Blackheath and Charlton residents, but not the whole Woolwich line

Well, it looks like an excellent train plan to me, save for a desire for the odd tweak to allow an extra 2tph from at least Sidcup or Grove Park way via Lewisham in order to give connectivity at peak.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,823
Location
Yorkshire
A couple of points to bear in mind please:

1) If anyone thinks anyone is breaking the forum rules, such as engaging in a personal attack, please report the post in question (using the report button below the post) and please do not reply to/react to or republish any such content on the forum.
2) Some of the posts are on the verge of speculative ideas; if anyone wishes to post any alternative proposals to those which are currently planned, you are more than welcome to do so, but we just ask that a new thread is created (in the Speculative Ideas section); you are very welcome to link to any such thread from here.

If anyone has any questions please contact us directly (using the contact form or conversation message)

Thanks :)
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
It's to force people to spend more...

Then why is it more expensive to use non HS1 services in the peak and HS1 services off peak then?

Surely if SE wanted to force people to spend more, they would make HS1 more expensive in the peaks as it's faster then the non HS1 services which shows that you're wrong with your method of thinking.

Because HS1 and it’s trains in the peak are all completely empty of course... this all in all solves nothing. I’m just hopeful the HS Rounders are now gone for good.

I disagree, when I've used them in the past Pre Covid19 they have been pretty busy with some being full and standing so I fail to see how they be dead.

As to the HS rounders, I hope they don't stop them because they're quite useful connecting the Kent Coast destinations with each other as well as providing a fast service to London.
 

FR510

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2020
Messages
55
Location
Kent
If they were moved to SE they would be moved under TUPE. They would stay on their existing contracts and would not have a cut in pay or a change in their terms and conditions.
That would certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons!!!
 

NorthKent1989

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2017
Messages
1,908
One thing that will happen with SE in the coming years will be the withdrawal of the Networkers, I’ve almost given up on a complete refurbishment of them, and the 707’s are coming on the metro routes very soon
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,040
Location
Taunton or Kent
One thing that will happen with SE in the coming years will be the withdrawal of the Networkers, I’ve almost given up on a complete refurbishment of them, and the 707’s are coming on the metro routes very soon
They will be going, but until an order/decision for their replacement is made we have no idea when. Given the fleet size and the time it's taking to get 701s into SWR it won't be a quick withdrawal.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,578
Location
London
They will be going, but until an order/decision for their replacement is made we have no idea when. Given the fleet size and the time it's taking to get 701s into SWR it won't be a quick withdrawal.

Not to mention the depot space problems which still hasn't been fully resolved.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,040
Location
Taunton or Kent
Not to mention the depot space problems which still hasn't been fully resolved.
Yes I went past the Chart Leacon site recently and while large amounts of clearing have been made, no sign of any siding laying yet (assuming I was looking in the right place).
 

73128

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
420
Location
Reading
I don’t do conspiracy theories, but I was told the idea was to make the Hayes line’s passenger numbers slightly fall; so folk use other stations in the area (Catford, Kent House) and therefore it makes a compelling case for the Bakerloo line as the route needs to be “revitalised”. It’s a stitch up from the DfT and they’re pretty much committed to the Bakerloo extension to Hayes and Beckenham Junction (but not then on conventional tracks to Bromley).



Not quite. The existing half-hourly peak service from Welwyn to Kings Cross which stops at places like New Barnet will be diverted to Blackfriars and then run the existing Blackfriars to Sevenoaks sector. The Orpington bit only runs at peak at the moment and goes to Luton.

The Cambridge stopper to Kings Cross will stay as it is. The Maidstone East bit that should have been a through service from Cambridge will then just terminate at Blackfriars.
i thought that it was more about reducing conflicting moves west of Lewisham. Most Hayes line passengers probably do not want to go to Victoria via Lewisham because there are other alternative (LCDR) routes that will get them quicker.
 

NorthKent1989

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2017
Messages
1,908
They will be going, but until an order/decision for their replacement is made we have no idea when. Given the fleet size and the time it's taking to get 701s into SWR it won't be a quick withdrawal.

No it will be a slow withdrawal, Shame really that Networkers on Southeastern haven’t been given the same love and care as they have been given on Chilterns, GW and GN

I know they have created an easy accessible area and upgraded the toilets on them but the seats are still worn looking
 

Chiltern006

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2018
Messages
658
there's rumours of the 707s replacing the 466s and the 465/2s as carriage numbers match up, but that's unconfirmed.

anyone know if tonbridge-edenbridge-redhill is transferring to Southeastern and merged with the Medway Valley Line service? cheers
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
there's rumours of the 707s replacing the 466s and the 465/2s as carriage numbers match up, but that's unconfirmed.

anyone know if tonbridge-edenbridge-redhill is transferring to Southeastern and merged with the Medway Valley Line service? cheers

GTR's "franchise" finishes in September. Now, based on the current trajectory, there's nothing to say there couldn't be a sneaky redistribution of the shuttle services from Tonbridge to Redhill back to Southeastern; I know the political pressure for it is vast, same for the return to half-hourly off-peak. Now, the fact the Medway Valley goes half-hourly all day between Paddock Wood and Strood (off-peak to Tonbridge, and peak to Tonbridge if evidence exists that the capacity into/out of Tonbridge simply doesn't exist), is a whole other thing. One thing that is certain is that you wouldn't have portions onto/off London trains at Redhill on the Edenbridge line if that was the case.

Anyway, it's also something of an unknown if Southeastern will be running the Marshlink.

Right, back to the start.

I don't know to what extent I agree with 465/2s (15 x 4, 60 vehicles) and 466s (43 x 2, 86 vehicles) being the way it will go. I have a sneaky suspicion some 466s will go, but the best condition / lowest mileage I strongly suspect will stay just a wee bit longer.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,040
Location
Taunton or Kent
there's rumours of the 707s replacing the 466s and the 465/2s as carriage numbers match up, but that's unconfirmed.

anyone know if tonbridge-edenbridge-redhill is transferring to Southeastern and merged with the Medway Valley Line service? cheers
The 707 arrivals might see some Networker sets going, but given Southeastern needs more capacity it would be wrong to make a like-for-like replacement of carriages. 466s are the most suitable for early withdrawal due to less PRM compliance and now they don't operate on their own in passenger service, any 10 car needs can be serviced by 707 and 376 formations. All the 465s could do with sticking around until a complete withdrawal is possible so that more 12 car allocations are possible.

By the sounds of all these extra services being talked about in May 2022 (even though the Chatham Mainline service appears to be being cut there'll be a net gain if the MDE line service is doubled and an extra Ashford fast service is provided), the less stock that gets withdrawn the better, as it'll all be needed.
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
The 707 arrivals might see some Networker sets going, but given Southeastern needs more capacity it would be wrong to make a like-for-like replacement of carriages. 466s are the most suitable for early withdrawal due to less PRM compliance and now they don't operate on their own in passenger service, any 10 car needs can be serviced by 707 and 376 formations. All the 465s could do with sticking around until a complete withdrawal is possible so that more 12 car allocations are possible.

By the sounds of all these extra services being talked about in May 2022 (even though the Chatham Mainline service appears to be being cut there'll be a net gain if the MDE line service is doubled and an extra Ashford fast service is provided), the less stock that gets withdrawn the better, as it'll all be needed.

If Southeastern have to run the Maidstone East all day, with some Ashford extensions, as well as some other odds and ends, I suspect you’ll actually need a few more 377s on SE too.
 

NorthKent1989

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2017
Messages
1,908
there's rumours of the 707s replacing the 466s and the 465/2s as carriage numbers match up, but that's unconfirmed.

anyone know if tonbridge-edenbridge-redhill is transferring to Southeastern and merged with the Medway Valley Line service? cheers

I haven’t heard anything about the Redhill-Tonbridge service being transferred to SE, but it’s a good shout, and should happen
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,040
Location
Taunton or Kent
If Southeastern have to run the Maidstone East all day, with some Ashford extensions, as well as some other odds and ends, I suspect you’ll actually need a few more 377s on SE too.
Where would they get them from though? SE definitely need to retain the ones they currently have, but will Southern actually give any up?

They might actually need to return some more Networkers to longer distance operations to make this work (and if this timetable lasts beyond their withdrawal whatever replaces them): the Maidstone-Blackfriars service could easily be done by them as it would be a cascade from Chatham mainline operations they won't be doing after this timetable change, with 377s staying for all the VIC-Ashford services.
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
Where would they get them from though? SE definitely need to retain the ones they currently have, but will Southern actually give any up?

They might actually need to return some more Networkers to longer distance operations to make this work (and if this timetable lasts beyond their withdrawal whatever replaces them): the Maidstone-Blackfriars service could easily be done by them as it would be a cascade from Chatham mainline operations they won't be doing after this timetable change, with 377s staying for all the VIC-Ashford services.
You're going to have a possible cascade of other units to free up a few more 387s south of the river; as well as 6 387s on the c2c. Few possibilities exist...
 

Chiltern006

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2018
Messages
658
what new-ish trains going off lease have shoes? or could go to se without too much hassle for other tocs
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
what new-ish trains going off lease have shoes? or could go to se without too much hassle for other tocs
It's more what trains that operate all over the shop may displace some units with shoes currently operating on AC...
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,129
Upthread there was a comment that Thameslink was not going to serve Maidstone after all. Presumably, the number of 700s ordered allowed for the Maidstone link, so what use are these spare trains being put to? Would any be availabe to Southeastern?
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,771
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Upthread there was a comment that Thameslink was not going to serve Maidstone after all. Presumably, the number of 700s ordered allowed for the Maidstone link, so what use are these spare trains being put to? Would any be availabe to Southeastern?

This is something I don’t quite get. There seems to be a shortage of 700s, yet there’s still services which haven’t appeared. The long turnarounds at KX probably account for one unit, but this still doesn’t account for Maidstone. The GN /0 fleet being captive from the rest of TL might also introduce a slight inefficiency, but again only minimal.

Having said that, it does seem to be the case that it’s 700/1s where any shortage lies. Even during Covid times it’s not uncommon to see 700/0s on /1 diagrams, as well as the booked /0 work on what are otherwise /1 service groups.

One question - did the Rainham service use up more /0s than might have been the case with Caterham and Tattenham Corner?
 
Last edited:

Chiltern006

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2018
Messages
658
could the Sevenoaks service (in future) be merged with the Cambridge stopper from kings Cross and stop the service at the stations the peak hour welwyn-london tl service to London stops at in peaks? could work stock wise but idk

would be good for the area as st Mary cray, Swanley and Otford can still get their Cambridge service, albeit slower
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,425
This is something I don’t quite get. There seems to be a shortage of 700s, yet there’s still services which haven’t appeared. The long turnarounds at KX probably account for one unit, but this still doesn’t account for Maidstone. The GN /0 fleet being captive from the rest of TL might also introduce a slight inefficiency, but again only minimal.

Having said that, it does seem to be the case that it’s 700/1s where any shortage lies. Even during Covid times it’s not uncommon to see 700/0s on /1 diagrams, as well as the booked /0 work on what are otherwise /1 service groups.

One question - did the Rainham service use up more /0s than might have been the case with Caterham and Tattenham Corner?
The booked work on /1 service groups is because the /0 units need to cycle via Three Bridges Depot.
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
could the Sevenoaks service (in future) be merged with the Cambridge stopper from kings Cross and stop the service at the stations the peak hour welwyn-london tl service to London stops at in peaks? could work stock wise but idk

would be good for the area as st Mary cray, Swanley and Otford can still get their Cambridge service, albeit slower

I don’t admittedly think that would work.

The booked work on /1 service groups is because the /0 units need to cycle via Three Bridges Depot.
I believe some Rainham (?) services run to / from Bedford and cycle the units off that way. Is that right?
 

KingJ

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2012
Messages
197
They only truncate to Paddock Wood if they can prove its impossible to path them at peak.

Unfortunately, weekday truncation at Paddock Wood has been the norm since the September 2020 timetable change - aside from a few early morning, late night and schools trains. This is a regression from the existing timetable, and was allegedly done for performance and reliability reasons despite very little evidence to support this. Sadly, I significantly doubt that the 2TPH all-day service on the Maidstone West line going through to Tonbridge from the 2017 ITT timetable is likely to see the light of day.
 

DA1

Member
Joined
22 May 2017
Messages
403
Location
England
I think this is going ahead. I believe Ashford drivers who had networkers taken off their traction will be signing them again. Another indication?
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,040
Location
Taunton or Kent
I think this is going ahead. I believe Ashford drivers who had networkers taken off their traction will be signing them again. Another indication?
If they're doubling the frequency of SEML services to Ashford but no extra stock of mainline capability (the 707s have no toilets) are being brought in with the timetable change, it would make sense if the stopping services to Ashford planned have Networker allocations, where 707s can cover for some of their metro operations. I can also see them returning to the Maidstone East line in greater numbers than since the 377s arrived, as that line frequency is also being doubled at the expense of Chatham mainline stoppers. As the latter are commonly Networker formations, it would be an easy internal cascade, although they could be limited to the Maidstone East-Blackfriars' services if 8 car capacity and 377 features are needed down to Ashford still.
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
I think this is going ahead. I believe Ashford drivers who had networkers taken off their traction will be signing them again. Another indication?

Potentially, one supposes. I would be surprised, however, if they used 465s in place of 377s; when 375s can be freed up from some other duties so 465/9s can do Tun Wells and Sole Street line.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
7,040
Location
Taunton or Kent
Potentially, one supposes. I would be surprised, however, if they used 465s in place of 377s; when 375s can be freed up from some other duties so 465/9s can do Tun Wells and Sole Street line.
Even if they don't do regular runs, they may wish to have the capability for Networkers to go back to Ashford for resilience purposes. For example, I suspect there are enough 375s to do all the VIC-DVP runs on a Saturday on the normal off-peak timetable, but one of the 5 allocations for the stopper has been a Networker, presumably to help retain route knowledge, as they have to do weekday Dover runs after morning peak services. Also while the 466 derogations prevent this now, there were occasional 466 runs on the Medway valley line at times that only 375s formed all the services, before one 466 was brought back into use between September 2018 and December 2019.
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
We shall see. On a normal day you're looking at 6 diagrams, although one assumes one benefit will be the fact that they should realistically be 4 Car, except peak.

Optimising it to allow a pair of 465/9s into Victoria on a peak Dartford extra to get them off Slade Green, empty to Blackfriars, split and form two services as an 8 car 377 coming in then goes empty to Grosvenor is one possibility. It works in reverse too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top