Has anyone mentioned TM Travel (the Sheffield one, not the North East one)? Wellglade took it over and really run it in to the ground.
I don't know about running it into the ground - it made sense as an acquisition, given the way that TM were winning so many tenders in the Nottinghamshire/ Derbyshire area - enabled Wellglade to eliminate a potential competitor (or at least, whilst TM might not have been a thread to established commercial services, they could have been bought by someone who wanted to use them as a launchpad for lucrative Wellglade corridors)
Under Wellglade operation, the number of tendered services have been cut, but a lot of that is due to the takeover having happened just a few months before the Coalition Government and the last decade of Austerity, which has meant a lot of routes that TM ran prior to January 2010 just no longer exist (e.g. under the previous Labour government there were a few "job seeker" routes put on to give deprived housing areas direct buses to office parks on the outskirts of Sheffield/ Rotherham without serving any town centres etc that look like complete luxuries in hindsight - we didn't know how good we had it!
As the tenders dried up, TM (under Wellglade) found a niche running commercial routes like the 6 and 30 in Sheffield and 218 to Chatsworth with brightly branded buses - the kind of routes that a low cost operator could sustain but First didn't make enough money on
Go-Ahead’s purchase of OK Travel ridded them of a pesky competitor in Tyne and Wear and north Durham, but they sold up the core operations in Bishop Auckland to Arriva, only to have repeatedly nibbled at the territory competitively since. I understand Peter Huntley arrived too late to stop the sale. What could have been…
The messy pattern of ex-NBC/PTE operations in the north east of England is a source of fascination to me - the way that Northern General and United had this mishmash of areas that didn't fit neatly onto the map in the way that other bits of NBC/PTEs were - the extension of the 21 in Durham suggests act GNE are back on the attack (as does the "cross town" extension of the X21 in Bishop Auckland) but I wonder if we'll have to see further "simplification" of the map to keep operators viable
Sticking in the bottom half of County Durham, Stagecoach’s adventures in Darlington weren’t an acquisition, but given they ended up with a sub-scale operation and sold it to Arriva, was it worth the financial cost, let alone the reputational impact? West Midlands Travel’s brief ownership of United/Tees/TMS also an odd one to add to their longer-standing Tayside adventure.
I thought about Stagecoach in Darlington when starting the thread, but they didn't buy it so it didn't fit - it feels like an example of "winning the battle but losing the war" - the benefits of winning a network in one town have to be seen against the damage to Stagecoach's reputation which will have cost them some future opportunities or scared away investors
As I understand it, Busways went after Tyne and Wear Omnibus when it heard that Trimdon was selling up. Trimdon said no to a sale to Busways, so Busways got Go-Ahead to act as an intermediary. I believe that Trimdon were rather less than pleased on hearing that Busways had managed to get Tyne and Wear Omnibus after all.
(I know I could have a rough guess by the name but) what were Tyne and Wear Omnibus's operations?
On my brief/rare trips to the city, Newcastle has seemed a bit of an oddity in that there hadn't been much competition on the frequent "city" operations (other than at the fringes, e.g. Great North Road/ Wallsend/ Cobalt), but I appreciate that there will have been some at some stage, it's just that I wasn't around to see it
If I remember correctly didn't Stagecoach have their claws into SB Holdings and the MMC told them to deinvest? Yes they had Western next door but nothing near what First had, and subsequently got away with?
I felt for SB Holdings. I reckon they could have built themselves up to a Lothian type operation with a high quality fleet without being in any group. Now look at it.
Correct. Stagecoach also had a stake in Mainline it was told to divest both of them and promptly did so, yet when First was told to offload a Glasgow depot along with Midland Bluebird it kicked up a stink.
I don't know if I'm getting my timescales mixed up, but is there an argument that Stagecoach's predatory behaviour in the small market of Darlington meant that they weren't able to persuade The Powers That Be to hold onto their share of the dominant operators in South Yorkshire and Greater Glasgow, meaning First were able to snap them up, even though First had more market domination in Glasgow than Stagecoach would ever have had?
Agreed re SB being capable of standing on its own two feet - in an alternative reality they could have remained independent and looked at picking up operations like Tayside Travel or Edinburgh Transport - they didn't need to sell out to a big company (in the way that some smaller companies would never have been able to go it alone)