• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EMR Class 360's

Hairy Bear

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
345
Location
Derbyshire
I understand that Siemens are also doing work on the units as well, so not just a repaint.
Internal communications have stated interior refurbishment to start at end of year.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,191
the 350/2s would've been better with EMR if they had come off lease earlier, wouldn't be any worries about a guard not being in the other unit

off topic to the thread but related to what you’ve said, do WMT have any non-gangway stock? 323s and 170s run in multi regularly don’t they?
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,254
Location
UK
I understand that Siemens are also doing work on the units as well, so not just a repaint.
Internal communications have stated interior refurbishment to start at end of year.
I still think it should’ve been arranged to happen either in conjunction with the repaints or before EMR pushed them into service - doesn’t really bode well for passengers who have returned to rail after almost two years to find their Intercity service replaced with a sub-standard commuter one…
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
4,982
off topic to the thread but related to what you’ve said, do WMT have any non-gangway stock? 323s and 170s run in multi regularly don’t they?
The 319s run around on West Coast services every day in 12 car formation with only one Guard.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,282
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
I understand that Siemens are also doing work on the units as well, so not just a repaint.
Internal communications have stated interior refurbishment to start at end of year.
Indeed, it is likely that at least one or other units may be away for a little bit longer.

As for the comments earlier regarding their repaints, they are hand sanded with electronic power sanders - there is no magic machine which comes along and strips paint (particularly the heavy stuff used by Siemens & FGE) back to bare metal.
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
4,982
Bare in mind though it’s been that way since the NSE days, albeit with 321s…
When 319s first arrived, there was no agreement for 12 car working. Up until May 2019, max of 8 car working permitted. In much the same way as some posters here are quick to argue that agreements at individual TOCs aren’t precedent for other TOCs, neither are agreements within TOCs.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,254
Location
UK
When 319s first arrived, there was no agreement for 12 car working. Up until May 2019, max of 8 car working permitted. In much the same way as some posters here are quick to argue that agreements at individual TOCs aren’t precedent for other TOCs, neither are agreements within TOCs.
Yes, but the guards working on the 319s in 12 coach formations won’t make the argument that it’s unsafe like the RMT are trying to do against EMR given that it was standard practice on the WCML stoppers until the 350 introduction.
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
2,902
The October issue of Modern Railways has a article about EMR in with some info about the Corby services and refurbishment program. When demand merits will be when the 12 car formations will be introduced but the priority is the refurbishment of the units which will be a similar standard as the 810s and the specification is in the 'final stages'. The first unit is expected to be completed in the 3rd quarter of next year.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,254
Location
UK
Is that the 810s or the 360s? I seem to remember that the first refurbished 360 would appear in January or a similar time.
At the rate the repaints of them are going, I feel as though Q3 next year is a bit optimistic…
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
587
One Corby to St Pancras service running 20 minutes late and the next cancelled due to a fault with the train.
I wonder whether EMR should just abandon the 360s and increase the order for the Aurora trains. Common fleet giving greater flexibility and efficiency.
Bad enough they put out a 4-car unit in the peak. Now they can't even do that.
 

spotify95

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2020
Messages
224
Location
Northamptonshire
One Corby to St Pancras service running 20 minutes late and the next cancelled due to a fault with the train.
I wonder whether EMR should just abandon the 360s and increase the order for the Aurora trains. Common fleet giving greater flexibility and efficiency.
Bad enough they put out a 4-car unit in the peak. Now they can't even do that.
One of the next ones, the 07.58 (from Wellingborough) has also had all of its calls removed and will be direct to London St Pancras. Certainly not ideal for Bedford or Luton customers as the equivalent Thameslink services will also carry the EMR passengers and will fill up quickly as they approach London!

The 07.39 going north from Wellingborough to Corby was also delayed, and unsurprisingly, the two Intercity trains behind were also delayed. This issue of the Connects delaying the Intercitys wouldn't happen if the Connects were slow from Bedford (rather than fast) and the line speed of the slows increased to 100mph (or 110mph) to compensate! As currently the Slows from Wellingborough down are pretty useless due to the low linespeed!

Even 90mph (as per Wellingborough to Kettering, and Kettering to Corby) would be fine for the Slows, and therefore fine for the Corby services.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,232
Location
DTOS A or B
One of the next ones, the 07.58 (from Wellingborough) has also had all of its calls removed and will be direct to London St Pancras. Certainly not ideal for Bedford or Luton customers as the equivalent Thameslink services will also carry the EMR passengers and will fill up quickly as they approach London!

The 07.39 going north from Wellingborough to Corby was also delayed, and unsurprisingly, the two Intercity trains behind were also delayed. This issue of the Connects delaying the Intercitys wouldn't happen if the Connects were slow from Bedford (rather than fast) and the line speed of the slows increased to 100mph (or 110mph) to compensate! As currently the Slows from Wellingborough down are pretty useless due to the low linespeed!

Even 90mph (as per Wellingborough to Kettering, and Kettering to Corby) would be fine for the Slows, and therefore fine for the Corby services.
The amount of times the 27/57 southbound from Wellingborough is delayed by the late running Nottingham. 7 minutes the other day we waited ( if the connect had been allowed to run it'd almost be at Bedford), often delayed 3/4 minutes due to this, the amount of time this initial repaint is taking is crazy.
 

spotify95

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2020
Messages
224
Location
Northamptonshire
The amount of times the 27/57 southbound from Wellingborough is delayed by the late running Nottingham. 7 minutes the other day we waited ( if the connect had been allowed to run it'd almost be at Bedford), often delayed 3/4 minutes due to this, the amount of time this initial repaint is taking is crazy.

Under those circumstances it would have probably been quicker to just send the Connect from Platform 4 down to Bedford on the Slows, then divert it back onto the Fasts once the Nottingham train has passed it! The 360s have decent acceleration so some of the time lost at a slow speed would be gained back again due to the faster acceleration.

I've seen it before where an EMR Connect has been held on Platform 4 until one of the faster services overtakes it - can't remember if it's the Sheffield or the Nottingham though.
 
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
188
Location
Eccles Signal Box
Under those circumstances it would have probably been quicker to just send the Connect from Platform 4 down to Bedford on the Slows, then divert it back onto the Fasts once the Nottingham train has passed it! The 360s have decent acceleration so some of the time lost at a slow speed would be gained back again due to the faster acceleration.
Going on the slow lines adds about 9 minutes to the journey time between Wellingborough and Bedford as the speed limit is much lower through Sharnbook tunnel. Far better to wait an extra couple of minutes at Wellingborough then cross to the Up Fast and quickly back up to 110mph.
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
587
The question remains why do the slow lines between Kettering and Bedford still have such restrictive speed restrictions. With the recent blockades to install overhead electrification, you'd have thought they'd have performed total route modernization and upgraded the track at the same time.

Now back to the 360s.
Monday am: service cancelled due to a train fault.
Monday evening, Tuesday morning and this evening: all 3 services are 4-car full and standing. The Connect service is now abysmal and nothing like the promises made by the EMR PR team.
I wonder if they could lease the ROG 360 units to supplement the 21 x EMR units as obviously fleet reliability is still a continuing issue.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,254
Location
UK
I'm pretty sure the reliability of the 360/2s was even worse...
Not worse, but still pretty bad - then again OOC was being demolished and the 360/2s were being replaced by the 345s, so Heathrow slacked in maintenance of them.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,179
Monday am: service cancelled due to a train fault.
Monday evening, Tuesday morning and this evening: all 3 services are 4-car full and standing. The Connect service is now abysmal and nothing like the promises made by the EMR PR team.

Where are you getting your info?

Monday morning - one peak service was cancelled between Corby and Kettering, but ran south of Kettering, albeit not calling at Bedford or the Lutons.

Monday evening - 2/6 peak trains were 4 car v 8 (1617 and 1747 departures from St P)

This morning - 1/6 peak trains was 4 car v 8 (0950 arrival at St P)

This evening - 1/6 peak trains is 4 car v 8 (1617 departure from St P)


It looks like you’ve been unlucky.
 
Last edited:

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Not worse, but still pretty bad - then again OOC was being demolished and the 360/2s were being replaced by the 345s, so Heathrow slacked in maintenance of them.
Last I checked the 360/1s had MTINs of about 18,000 vs 4,000 for the 360/2s. Perhaps they improved at the very end of their tenure?
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
587
Where are you getting your info? Monday morning - one peak service was cancelled between Corby and Kettering, but ran south of Kettering, albeit not calling at Bedford or the Lutons. Monday evening - 2/6 peak trains were 4 car v 8 (1617 and 1747 departures from St P) This morning - 1/6 peak trains was 4 car v 8 (0950 arrival at St P) This evening - 1/6 peak trains is 4 car v 8 (1617 departure from St P) It looks like you’ve been unlucky.
This morning the Corby service arriving St Pancras at 0654 was also a 4-car.
Some might claim this is before the 'peak' but I wouldn't like to argue that case with the number of city commuters onboard or the fact EMR charge peak-time fares for travel on this service.

Filthy carpets, tatty upholstery and commuters crammed into a 4-car unit is not what the PR merchants promised.
'New' electric trains with 12 coaches in the peaks was the rhetoric. What is being delivered is well below par.
They might blame COVID for the delayed refurbishment, but they haven't even entered into a contract for the internal refurbishment yet, let alone started the interior refit. The design and procurement process should have been completed before COVID even hit.
 

D7666

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2013
Messages
540
When 319s first arrived, there was no agreement for 12 car working. Up until May 2019, max of 8 car working permitted. In much the same way as some posters here are quick to argue that agreements at individual TOCs aren’t precedent for other TOCs, neither are agreements within TOCs.
I am not disagreeing with precedent somewhere does not set agreement elsewhere.

But you are wrong to say "up until May 2019 max of 8 car working" w.r.t. 319s.

Connex South Central operated 12car 319s. And Connex were no more from 2001.

In the period when 319\2 were the all day every day Victoria Brighton fasts, there were in morning peak two Up Brighton Victorias that were 12car 319s; in the evening peak two down of one each from London Bridge and Victoria to Brighton. There were formed by attaching 319\0 to 319\2; IIRC one working was 2 x \2 + 1 x \0 and the other 1 x \2 + 2 x \0.

I repeat, not attempting to suggest that just becasue CSC did that anyone else could do it, then or later, just pointing out that 12car 319 occurred almost 20 years before 05\19.

Anyway, way off topic for this thread.

Are we actually sure these short formed EMR 360s are down to a unit shortage - or to a staff shortage ?

If - and I am unsure - the agreement is "guard" in each unit, even on an 8car, then if there are not enough staff to cover all that, then they have to run a short train. I just find it hard to believe that given Desiro and Siemens high reputation EMR can't turn out 14 (to cover 7 8car) from 21 units.
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,179
I just find it hard to believe that given Desiro and Siemens high reputation EMR can't turn out 14 (to cover 7 8car) from 21 units.

Don’t forget there’s always at least one in maintenance, and currently IIRC a couple out for painting etc. Then if a couple are awaiting repair following big failures, suddenly it’s a much less favourable ratio.
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
587
Don’t forget there’s always at least one in maintenance, and currently IIRC a couple out for painting etc. Then if a couple are awaiting repair following big failures, suddenly it’s a much less favourable ratio.
For the half hourly frequency, I think it requires 12 units to be serviceable from a fleet of 21. 6 service patterns formed of 2 x 4-car units each.
The current problem isn't staffing. The 4-car unit has a single guard just like an 8-car. And EMR are struggling to provide 8-cars, let alone the promised 12-cars.
I feel sorry for the staff who are regularly having to deal with the short forms, crowded trains and the negative impact on customer perception.
 

JaJaWa

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2013
Messages
1,705
Location
The 8 car limitation for Thameslink 319s was due to the requirement for evacuation from the ends in the Thameslink Core.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,254
Location
UK
The 8 car limitation for Thameslink 319s was due to the requirement for evacuation from the ends in the Thameslink Core.
Another reason was due to a 75mph restriction in 12 coach formation due to the mixture of brecknell wills/stone faiveley pantographs used in the fleet - LNR have since fitted the former to theirs to resolve this.
 

D7666

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2013
Messages
540
The 8 car limitation for Thameslink 319s was due to the requirement for evacuation from the ends in the Thameslink Core.
Ummm ...... , (1) 319s have end of unit doors for PRECISELY for evacuation, you simply move from one unit to another to evacuate single ended (and I as a passenger have done that in an emergency you step over the coupler (2) no Thameslink core station or north of core station had platforms of more than 8car then and SDO was not around then (3) the MML OLE could not take 3EMU operation with the Faively pans all the first 60 units (319/0 as built) without a speed limit (60 mph AIUI)

Re 360, I am fully aware you have a unit on maintenence but for 21 units that's only 1, and GE managed to turn out 20 units.

IF you have "a couple out for repainting" that's still 18 - so something is badly badly wrong if there are another 6 stopped.

This is 60% availability only which is appalling for a type that generically can return 96%.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,367
Location
Bolton
Ummm ...... , (1) 319s have end of unit doors for PRECISELY for evacuation, you simply move from one unit to another to evacuate single ended (and I as a passenger have done that in an emergency you step over the coupler (2) no Thameslink core station or north of core station had platforms of more than 8car then and SDO was not around then (3) the MML OLE could not take 3EMU operation with the Faively pans all the first 60 units (319/0 as built) without a speed limit (60 mph AIUI)

Re 360, I am fully aware you have a unit on maintenence but for 21 units that's only 1, and GE managed to turn out 20 units.

IF you have "a couple out for repainting" that's still 18 - so something is badly badly wrong if there are another 6 stopped.

This is 60% availability only which is appalling for a type that generically can return 96%.
319s were in use for a really very long time after twelve car operation started in 2012. I think it was at least five years.
 

Top