• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Avanti service reductions from Monday 26th July

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,418
Never said it was about the money.

They are taking the easy option to run a minimum service rather than deploy what resources they have available. This is a result of us moving away from a turn up and go service and too much reliance upon advanced bookings to drive revenue.
Better a contingency service that actually works than a more ambitious service that then falls apart every day (and in a different way each time).
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,932
I wonder whether, across a number of impacted TOCs, there will be attempts at demand suppression by way of ‘consider whether your journey is necessary’ messaging, or similar.

It’s a good job that those of us who have been working from home didn’t all return to the office on July 19th, having eschewed ‘advice’ from the outer reaches of the Covid sub-forum.
If I was a commuter (i'm not) I wouldn't be returning until September anyway. Kids are off school, London gets hot in summer and with social distancing reducing services adhoc and short notice, this drop off remaining in situ is of no surprise to me whatsoever.
 

XAM2175

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2016
Messages
3,469
Location
Glasgow
Which is why journey planners won't suggest it.

Does the original post not say it is being suggested?
The national rail enquires journey planner suggests using the Glasgow service from crewe and changing at Warrington Bank Quay for Manchester but how many people who just turn up on the day will do that I don't know. ...
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,074
Which is why journey planners won't suggest it.
The NRE app is suggesting it, as it often does when there is a large gap between trains. It's not offering a fare however.
I thought it was, and this was changed a few years ago: MA + NR as one of the permitted routes (although this may be Warrington Central though).
View attachment 100257
Interesting. I was going off the fact that NRE never offers a fare for that routing (either via Bank Quay or Central), which is usually pretty reliable.

Screenshot_20210725-134710.png
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,042
Location
UK
Does the original post not say it is being suggested?
I think there might be some confusion here. It's not a permitted route to travel from Crewe to Manchester via Warrington, but from Rugeley and south thereof (including London), it is.

NRE will suggest non-permitted routes by offering split tickets, but if you try to take up the offer of a link to a booking site (it doesn't actually sell tickets), most booking sites will only put the first ticket into the basket.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,800
Location
Wilmslow
I think there might be some confusion here. It's not a permitted route to travel from Crewe to Manchester via Warrington, but from Rugeley and south thereof (including London), it is.
Good point - Crewe to Manchester is map GM only, which means via Wilmslow (other than direct trains, which don't normally exist).
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
1,264
Location
Neath
Although technically that isn't actually a permitted route ticketing wise!
But passengers could just get a Crewe to Warrington and Warrington to Manchester ticket or it would make more sense to allow passengers ticket acceptance on this route during the lack of direct services from Crewe to Manchester.
 

sd0733

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2012
Messages
3,585
But passengers could just get a Crewe to Warrington and Warrington to Manchester ticket or it would make more sense to allow passengers ticket acceptance on this route during the lack of direct services from Crewe to Manchester.
There are even less trains from Warrington though and still end up on a 2/3 car 175. The Northern isnt running for 2 weeks after Friday so Warrington is worse capacity than Crewe!
 

adrock1976

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2013
Messages
4,450
Location
What's it called? It's called Cumbernauld
Although technically that isn't actually a permitted route ticketing wise!

Which is why journey planners won't suggest it.

I would maintain that diverting the XC is the least worst option in the circumstances.

When did Crewe - Manchester via Warrington BQ, Earlestown cease to be a permitted route?

This was the original route many years ago back in the days of when the Liverpool & Manchester, Grand Junction, and London & Birmingham Railways were built (which all became part of the London & North Western) before the diagonal route(s) via Wilmslow were built.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,042
Location
UK
When did Crewe - Manchester via Warrington BQ, Earlestown cease to be a permitted route?

This was the original route many years ago back in the days of when the Liverpool & Manchester, Grand Junction, and London & Birmingham Railways were built (which all became part of the London & North Western) before the diagonal route(s) via Wilmslow were built.
Some point between 1837 and the present day!

Less facetiously, probably when the Routeing Guide was introduced, so around 1997.
 

142blue

On Moderation
Joined
30 Jul 2013
Messages
261
Location
UK
I had booked one of their North Wales to Manchester Avanti only tickets via Crewe for this coming Wednesday[28th July].
I checked the website at 7am and found the revised timetable for this week is now up. As expected, the Euston - Manchester via Crewe services are now cancelled, so my ticket is now useless.
I requested a full refund at 7.15am, and by 7.30am had heard that a full refund would be made. So I'm impressed with the speed they are reacting to a problem not immediately of their making.
There was acceptance with northern last time, not seen anything this time but will check next time I'm in
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,228
School holidays are the time to increase frequencies, not reduce them!
 

DaveB10780

Member
Joined
10 Sep 2015
Messages
210
What I don't understand is that if the overall Covid numbers continue decreasing why services cannot be added. It seems an awful long time to reduce to 1 per hour.
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,337
What I don't understand is that if the overall Covid numbers continue decreasing why services cannot be added. It seems an awful long time to reduce to 1 per hour.
As I said up thread

Presumably the service to be advertised is one they feel confident can be delivered. Better to do that and maybe run some additionals if possible and required than have to make short notice cancellations, I'd say.
 

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
1,393
Location
London
Not for services that serve the commuter and business markets, which is typically 20-30% down in school summer holidays.

Agreed, but if you're commuting from Coventry to Euston for example that used to have a fast service every 20 minutes, and now it's hourly (and stops at all three of the usual intermediate stops rather than just one (or none pre-covid!) so it's slower than normal), that's quite the reduction! I had the misfortune to be on the 0732 this morning and it was cosy, to say the least. Couple that with no decrease on ticket prices -- indeed one could call it an increase due to the lack of advance tickets available because of the service reduction -- and it's a bit sh*t, quite frankly. There's no perfect answer to all of this of course, but my example above would be one of many across the network, I'd wager.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,157
Agreed, but if you're commuting from Coventry to Euston for example that used to have a fast service every 20 minutes, and now it's hourly (and stops at all three of the usual intermediate stops rather than just one (or none pre-covid!) so it's slower than normal), that's quite the reduction! I had the misfortune to be on the 0732 this morning and it was cosy, to say the least. Couple that with no decrease on ticket prices -- indeed one could call it an increase due to the lack of advance tickets available because of the service reduction -- and it's a bit sh*t, quite frankly. There's no perfect answer to all of this of course, but my example above would be one of many across the network, I'd wager.

But there aren’t many Coventry to London commuters at present. As it happens I did London to Coventry this evening, peak train, maybe 40% of seats taken leaving London.

Meanwhile over on Thameslink, peak fast trains from Bedford to London are running 2tph vice the normal 8. Pre Covid those 8tph would be full and standing from St Albans - some near crush loaded. This week the 2tph have spare seats a plenty.
 

The Fox 4846

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
31
Location
Birmingham
Looks like on Saturdays there will be 2tph to Birmingham with the 2nd Birmingham arriving 45 leaving 16 from Birmingham to Manchester, operating via Bescot to Crewe before operating to Man Picc via Wilmslow
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,157
Looks like on Saturdays there will be 2tph to Birmingham with the 2nd Birmingham arriving 45 leaving 16 from Birmingham to Manchester, operating via Bescot to Crewe before operating to Man Picc via Wilmslow

There’s a fair bit of engineering work on the Trent Valley on weekends this summer - major track works and HS2 work. The train plan for that has been planned for some time and would be quite a task to unpick it at this notice.
 

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,351
Location
Edinburgh
The reduced timetable doesn’t seem to be doing too great either. Few cancellations due to a shortage of train crew.

Worst has to be the cancellation of two Euston - Glasgow trains in a row (1010 and 1118).

It’s quite astounding really.

EDIT: Talking rubbish. The 10:10 departed fine.
 
Last edited:

Peter0124

Established Member
Joined
20 Nov 2016
Messages
1,954
Location
Glasgow
The reduced timetable doesn’t seem to be doing too great either. Few cancellations due to a shortage of train crew.

Worst has to be the cancellation of two Euston - Glasgow trains in a row (1010 and 1118).

It’s quite astounding really.
The 12:18 is also cancelled, and so were the 07:37 and 08:36 off GLA, doesn't look good
 

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,351
Location
Edinburgh
The 12:18 is also cancelled, and so were the 07:37 and 08:36 off GLA, doesn't look good

God damn. This really isn't boding well at all.

I do hope it doesn't mean they have to cut the frequencies further.

Did mean the 11:27 Euston - Preston has been reported as full and standing.
 

Trackman

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2013
Messages
2,948
Location
Lewisham
God damn. This really isn't boding well at all.

I do hope it doesn't mean they have to cut the frequencies further.

Did mean the 11:27 Euston - Preston has been reported as full and standing.
Just had a look on RTT at Euston for Avanti, 29 passenger outbounds cancelled so far.
I do hope it doesn't mean they have to cut the frequencies further.
It's looking glum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top