Fair enough - clearly I wasn’t there so don’t know. The story you’ve linked to appears to indicate otherwise, however.
I disagree with the view that it’s difficult to get rid of people on the railway, in stark contrast to (for example) the NHS where a friend of mine works in management and openly admits there is a culture to never sack people, even for things that would constitute gross misconduct and lead to summary dismissal in most industries. In fact I can honestly say I’ve seen more people sacked from the railway than my previous industry which had no unionisation at all.
The exception to this might be union reps who (wrongly) probably are harder to get rid of, because there’s inevitably an automatic argument that they’re being targeted for union activities.
My place doesn’t function like the above, though there are likely to be structural reasons why this might be the case.
Many aspect of management could be described as being on the fiddle themselves, so it becomes hard to apply performance management across the board without cupboards being opened to find skeletons. For example, in a business unit known to me there’s a manager who comes in for roughly four hours per day (and who, needless to say, has utilised Covid as a means of significantly reducing even from that). He has done various things to staff including touching someone inappropriately at a team event, threatening to “finish off” someone in a meeting in front of 15 people, and making continual unwanted references to the IRA to an Irish member of staff. Needless to say, the next level down love this as it allows total freedom to get away with virtually anything, save an open & shut safety-related screwup.
Union reps fall into two boxes. Some get on very well with management as they are a useful resource. This leaves the “awkward” ones, and what tends to happen is attempts will be made to get rid of them as and when an opportunity arises, which is fine except that these opportunities tend to be partial ones, so there’s a chance someone will try to make a case which isn’t quite there, so what you get is much time off the job whilst the process takes place, then either thrown out, thrown out on appeal, or in some cases a tribunal.
The “70s” are certainly alive and well, but I wouldn’t put this down to the unions, but more to dubious recruitment.
The devil favours their own?