Who exactly has the right, as long as the RMT complies with the relevant legislation, to "scrutinise" them? Sounds like Big Brother to me...The role of an MP is to act in the best interests of their constituents, doesn't mean they shouldn't be scrutinised.
The RMT have said "The RMT will use every weapon available to secure the reinstatement of GC."
"Every Weapon"
Does that sound responsible to you?
They picked today as the proposed date for the strike as "We are mindful that the Mayoral election is in May, which coincides with an predicted upturn in traffic!"
So a group purporting to act in the best interests of their members deliberately chose a date to disrupt elections and you don't think that should have any scrutiny?!
To be very clear, l am not a great fan of RMT but certainly am of human rights. You need to understand that just because you (or the Daily Heil) regard something as wrong that doesn't mean that it is wrong.
Bet that you think Mussolini, because he made the trains run on time, was wonderful....
Last edited: