• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Donald Trump and the aftermath of his presidency

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

A Challenge

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2016
Messages
2,823
That's a seismic shift for this Republican party.
I had heard it said (on BBC's Americast) that the longer they left it the harder they would find it to get the Republicans on side but I wasn't expecting it to be this quickly, I merely thought they meant that as an argument for not waiting two weeks. Seems like it might be a problem even now, so much as I hope Citizen Trump (how nice to type that!) will be impeached convicted, I am not sure this is likely, unfortunately.
 
Last edited:

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,785
Location
Scotland
Seems like it might be a problem even now, so much as I hope Citizen Trump (how nice to type that!) will be impeached, I am not sure this is likely, unfortunately.
He's already been impeached. The question is if they can get him barred from holding office in future.
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,113
Location
SE London
I had heard it said (on BBC's Americast) that the longer they left it the harder they would find it to get the Republicans on side but I wasn't expecting it to be this quickly, I merely thought they meant that as an argument for not waiting two weeks. Seems like it might be a problem even now, so much as I hope Citizen Trump (how nice to type that!) will be impeached, I am not sure this is likely, unfortunately.

And not helped by the way Trump and his supporters are even now seeking to have any senators or representatives who vote against Trump challenged and removed at the next primaries.

Once again, I look with bafflement at the way the US system mixes up politics and justice. Much as I hope Trump is found guilty and barred from further office, it seems absurd that the judges in the trial are not trained professional judges, but politicians, all of whom have clear vested interests in the outcome of the trial - a fact that of course enables the defendant (Trump) and his supporters to try to influence the vote with political threats that - in any 'normal' context - would be rightfully viewed as an attempt to subvert justice (and in the UK I'm guessing would see a charge of something like contempt of court being swiftly brought).
 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2020
Messages
5,134
Location
Birmingham
The GOP is still Trump's party and they are scared of doing anything to upset their Trump supporting base. The recent actions by the Arizona party have been interesting, no sense of moving on at all.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,785
Location
Scotland
Much as I hope Trump is found guilty and barred from further office, it seems absurd that the judges in the trial are not trained professional judges, but politicians, all of whom have clear vested interests in the outcome of the trial
That's because, despite using the language of - "jury", "trial", "conviction" - and the trappings of - calling of witnesses, arguments and deliberations - a legal proceeding, impeachment and removal is a political process that sits outside the justice system. The only thing that the process is designed to determine is if the accused is fit to hold office, either now or in the future.

To highlight that this is not a criminal proceeding, consider that the only punishment they can impose is removal from and barring from future office, regardless of if the offence was murder or excessive flatulence.
 

Typhoon

Established Member
Joined
2 Nov 2017
Messages
3,509
Location
Kent
Sorry if this has been reported elsewhere
As Joe Biden marks his first full week in office, a new report suggests that more than 30,000 registered Republican voters have left the GOP in response to the events of 6 January when a mob of pro-Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol in protest at the Democrat’s election win, leaving five people dead.
The italicising is mine so no reliable evidence but if even if just some this is just partly true, it shows a discontent among what are probably loyal Republicans. OK, some will come back but there must be a possibility that they will not donate, not canvass, not leaflet, not display posters until the party adopts a more traditional stance. If Biden adopts moderate policies that they can tolerate (but not necessarily support), they may sit on their hands come election time. There may be others who haven't torn up their membership cards but also feel disillusioned with how the Trump presidency concluded; they, too, may lack the necessary enthusiasm come election time. The Republicans are going to have to decide pretty quickly whether it is the Trump agenda or the traditional Republican agenda that they are going to follow, the difference mainly being over style rather than substance.

www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/biden-news-live-republican-party-suffers-mass-exodus-as-fbi-thwarts-plot-against-california-governor/ar-BB1daoRy?ocid=msedgntp
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,785
Location
Scotland
Oh, the inter-faction fighting in the Republican party has just started. The Drumph years have just widened the cracks that existed in the Tea Party era into gaping chasms. There's a more than 50% chance that they'll never be bridged or fixed and we'll end up with a sizeable third party.

If that happens, I can see some of the less progressive Democrats joining them as a Centrist party.
 

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,218
Location
Clydebank
They sued her a couple of weeks ago. Rudi is the second case they're bringing to court.



Ah, duly noted. :) Must've missed that in the cascade of news over the last month. Good on them for taking both of those demented windbags on, even if they fail to wring that much from either of them.

I genuinely believe the pair of them have loose screws. The only 'kraken' the last three months has truly released is that of poor mental health in people dangerously close to (formerly) the world's most powerful figure.
In Rudy's case, it's been evident since at least late 2001 (when he tried to subvert democracy & stay in office as New York Mayor past the end of his term on the basis of his successor, Mike Bloomberg, not being qualified to handle the crisis that was the immediate aftermath of 9/11) that he has more than a couple screws loose. That, or it was his 2008 presidential campagian that showcased just how detached from reality he really was. And that's not even getting into the whole 'marrying one's cousin' thing...

In light of all that, it's hardly surprising that Giuliani's daughter broke ranks with her father and endorsed Biden for President last year. One can only imagine what Rudy's reaction was when he found out...
 

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
2,411
Well Trump has now left the Screen Actors Guild after they launched a disciplinary hearing against him in regards to the capitol attack, though how they let him in in the first place given his level of acting talent.
 
Last edited:

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,369
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Well Trump has not left the Screen Actors Guild after they launched a disciplinary hearing against him in regards to the capitol attack, though how they let him in in the first place given his level of acting talent.

His 'I quit your union' letter to SAG was unintentionally hilarious. Great window into his absolutely warped mind and fragile ego.
 

Typhoon

Established Member
Joined
2 Nov 2017
Messages
3,509
Location
Kent
Well Trump has not left the Screen Actors Guild after they launched a disciplinary hearing against him in regards to the capitol attack, though how they let him in in the first place given his level of acting talent.
I don't really agree, I've seen enough US TV to know its a pretty low bar and I thought he had sulking, petulance, irrationality, bullying and incompetence down to a 'T', I've rarely seen it done better.
His 'I quit your union' letter to SAG was unintentionally hilarious. Great window into his absolutely warped mind and fragile ego.
And he does 'delusional' pretty well. Thanks for the 'heads-up'on this, I'm sure that we can expect more in a similar vein in the months to come.
 
Last edited:

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,868
Well Trump has not left the Screen Actors Guild after they launched a disciplinary hearing against him in regards to the capitol attack, though how they let him in in the first place given his level of acting talent.
Was that a typo' for "now"? Or has he changed his mind about leaving?
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,369
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Was that a typo' for "now"? Or has he changed his mind about leaving?

No, he definitely left.

https://www.sagaftra.org/files/SAG-AFTRAResignationLetterfromPresidentDonaldJTrump.pdf

February 4, 2020

Ms. Carteris:

I write to you today regarding the so-called Disciplinary Committee hearing aimed at revoking my union membership. Who cares! While I’m not familiar with your work, I’m very proud of my work on movies such as Home Alone 2, Zoolander and Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps; and television shows including The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, Saturday Night Live, and of course, one of the most successful shows in television history, The Apprentice – to name just a few! I’ve also greatly helped the cable news television business (said to be a dying platform with not much time left until I got involved in politics), and created thousands of jobs at networks such as MSDNC and Fake News CNN, among many others. Which brings me to your blatant attempt at free media attention to distract from your dismal record as a union. Your organization has done little for its members, and nothing for me – besides collecting dues and promoting dangerous un-American policies and ideas – as evident by your massive unemployment rates and lawsuits from celebrated actors, who even recorded a video asking, “Why isn’t the union fighting for me?” These, however, are policy failures. Your disciplinary failures are even more egregious. I no longer wish to be associated with your union. As such, this letter is to inform you of my immediate resignation from SAG-AFTRA. You have done nothing for me.

Regards,

President Donald J. Trump
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,785
Location
Scotland
That letter is hilarious, the fact that an adult would send something like that to a professional organisation speaks volumes!
Right down to the fact that he signed it "President Donald J Trump", despite being an ex-president for more than two weeks.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,647
Location
Redcar
Right down to the fact that he signed it "President Donald J Trump", despite being an ex-president for more than two weeks.

I thought it was more amusing that the letter head was "Office of Donald J Trump" around the Great Seal of the United States (which might be illegal but I've not looked into it in detail myself). Obviously trying to cling onto the trappings of the presidency is old Donny.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,369
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
I thought it was more amusing that the letter head was "Office of Donald J Trump" around the Great Seal of the United States (which might be illegal but I've not looked into it in detail myself). Obviously trying to cling onto the trappings of the presidency is old Donny.

I thought it was a slight hangover to a tradition of ex-presidents still being addressed as 'president' but obviously Agent Orange is taking that to the next level with his signatures. What an absolute.. Trump.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,785
Location
Scotland
I thought it was more amusing that the letter head was "Office of Donald J Trump" around the Great Seal of the United States (which might be illegal but I've not looked into it in detail myself).
It's visually similar to the Great Seal but there are a couple of differences - the shape of the shield is different and the three stars underneath it aren't part of the official seal. But it's obviously designed to fool anyone who's not paying attention to the fine detail.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,772
Location
Devon
It's visually similar to the Great Seal but there are a couple of differences - the shape of the shield is different and the three stars underneath it aren't part of the official seal. But it's obviously designed to fool anyone who's not paying attention to the fine detail.
An absolute grifter all the way. :lol:
 

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,218
Location
Clydebank
Whelp, we can add Fox to those getting their backsides sued for spreading the baselss election fraud BS (for $2.7bn by Smartmatic, a voting machine manufacturer). Trump sycophants Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo & Jeanine Pirro have all been named in this suit; Dobbs' show has been canned entirely.


US broadcaster Fox has cancelled the TV programme hosted by Lou Dobbs, a vocal Trump supporter who is accused of using his platform to spread baseless claims of fraud in the 2020 election.

The news emerged a day after Dobbs was named in a defamation lawsuit filed by the voting machine maker Smartmatic.

The $2.7bn (£2bn) lawsuit claims Dobbs was part of a "disinformation campaign" against the company.

Fox, which denies the allegations, said the Dobbs decision was not linked.

The veteran financial journalist, 75, has presented Lou Dobbs Tonight on the Fox Business Network since 2011. He was also an occasional commentator on Fox News, the conservative channel that has been home to several staunch supporters of Mr Trump.

Dobbs - who has recently written the book The Trump Century: How Our President Changed the Course of History Forever - said he had no comment.

Despite the cancellation of his programme, Dobbs remained under contract but was unlikely to appear on the network again, the Los Angeles Times reports.

The Smartmatic lawsuit names Fox Corporation, which is Fox Business Network's parent company, as well as Fox News, Dobbs and two other Fox hosts - Maria Bartiromo and Jeanine Pirro. It also cites Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, two lawyers who represented Mr Trump.

The company accused the group of intentionally repeating the false claim that it was "responsible for stealing" the election by "switching and altering votes to rig" the election for Joe Biden.

Smartmatic claims Dobbs was "one of the primary proponents and speakers for the disinformation campaign".

Fox said on Thursday the network was "proud of our 2020 election coverage and will vigorously defend this meritless lawsuit in court".

And there, crystallized in that last quote, is the pyschotic alternative reality in which these goons live.
 

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
2,411
Well Trump tried to claim that this second impeachment was unconstitutional but to no success, so the trial will go ahead. There was one Republican speaking who could not be more ashamed of trumps acts calling on republicans to find him guilty.

One interesting thing that was trending a few days ago was "Bin Laden", with people remarking that whilst Bin Laden never committed any of the terrorist acts and only told people to carry them out that did not make him innocent, something all sides agree on, yet when Trump does something similar he is supposedly innocent?!
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,113
Location
SE London
Well Trump tried to claim that this second impeachment was unconstitutional but to no success, so the trial will go ahead. There was one Republican speaking who could not be more ashamed of trumps acts calling on republicans to find him guilty.

One interesting thing that was trending a few days ago was "Bin Laden", with people remarking that whilst Bin Laden never committed any of the terrorist acts and only told people to carry them out that did not make him innocent, something all sides agree on, yet when Trump does something similar he is supposedly innocent?!

Yeah, I guess it's not a perfect analogy because Bin Laden actually organised people to carry out terrorist attacks whereas Trump confined himself to 'merely' inciting the insurrection. But there is some logic to what you say.

Another point - again not a perfect analogy but I think worth mentioning - is the Republican/Trump's claim that he shouldn't be tried because he's no longer President. Presumably, the Senators pushing that line also think that anyone who takes advantage of their employment to commit any crime should never be tried if they've already left their job. So, any company director - feel free to commit fraud, just make sure you resign your directorship before any trial starts. Ditto anyone who wants to steal from their employer, abuse anyone they are supposed to be caring for, etc. etc.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,785
Location
Scotland
Presumably, the Senators pushing that line also think that anyone who takes advantage of their employment to commit any crime should never be tried if they've already left their job.
They've referred to it as the January Exception - follow the law for your entire term, then break whatever laws you want in the first weeks of January before leaving office.
 

kermit

Member
Joined
2 May 2011
Messages
592
Apparently Trump is now formally the subject of a criminal investigation in Georgia over his phone call urging the election official there to "find" him some more votes. This looks to me like a far more sturdy prospect of conviction than the inherently loaded, partisan impeachment trial.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,785
Location
Scotland
This looks to me like a far more sturdy prospect of conviction than the inherently loaded, partisan impeachment trial.
Two separate and distinct things. An impeachment is a political process, not criminal.
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
3,865
Two separate and distinct things. An impeachment is a political process, not criminal.

Indeed. Although his defence’s weird opening comments yesterday pointed this out. Let’s hope someone in the right places thinks that’s a good idea and gets him arrested
 

Top