Edited completely as I was wrong but don't want to leave the confusing post.Hi, what's the difference between a Wright Eclipse Gemini 3 and a Wright Gemini 3?
I thought the Eclipse name was just dropped to simplify when the 3 came out. Gemini basically being Latin for twin ie twin deck was only used for double decker not single deckers.
Quite a bit more sense to be made there as opposed to the Wright 'Classic' range.I believe the name variations applied to the type of chassis that was bodied.
Eclipse was for Volvo
Solar was for Scania
Pulsar was for VDL/DAF
Gemini was only added for double deck vehicles.
Didn't Wright have some significant issues with marrying the Gemini body to the Scania double-deck chassis of the period (N94 I think it was), thus the Solar Gemini never saw the light of day?Gemini was used for double decks, so a Volvo would have an Eclipse Gemini body. There was a Pulsar Gemini as well. Had Wright's built a double deck on Scania chassis, logically it would have been the Solar Gemini.
Lothian have 24 of these types as well.Thats how I understand it, actually there was a period where Gemini 3 bodies were built with older style Gemini 2 fronts (2013-2015) and the Eclipse part of the name seems to have been dropped during that time.
I think Dublin bus specified the old style front for few more years
Another factoid that I completely overlooked is that the first Wright-bodied buses for Hong Kong (a total of 100 Volvo B10TLs aka Super Olympians for Kowloon Motor Bus, the first examples entering service in November 2003) had a version of the Gemini body that was known, at least at first, as the Wright Explorer (attached images copyright of gakei.com).Oh, and you can add Meridian to that list for the few (well, 28) single-deck bodies Wright built on MAN NL273F chassis in the back half of the 2000s (attached images are my own).
Thats how I understand it, actually there was a period where Gemini 3 bodies were built with older style Gemini 2 fronts (2013-2015) and the Eclipse part of the name seems to have been dropped during that time.
I think Dublin bus specified the old style front for few more years
The Pre-Facelift Gemini 3 is still built, albeit in fairly limited numbers.Lothian have 24 of these types as well.
They had a demonstrator back in 2014 https://www.flickr.com/photos/steveneh8/13976926390/in/dateposted/
I can't vouch for the accuracy of that story but it is one i've heard before too, supposedly First Scotland East's Scania N94UD East Lancs Omnidekkas were originally to be Wright bodied. Given the N94UD itself is regarded as quite a solid chassis i do wonder what a Wright bodied version would be like given the Omnidekka body isn't exactly the most solid things...Didn't Wright have some significant issues with marrying the Gemini body to the Scania double-deck chassis of the period (N94 I think it was), thus the Solar Gemini never saw the light of day?
The Pre-Facelift Gemini 3 is still built, albeit in fairly limited numbers.
Wrightbuses with the "U" shape windscreen are known as the "Millennium" design, while the more recent ones are the "Stealth" design.
I can't vouch for the accuracy of that story but it is one i've heard before too, supposedly First Scotland East's Scania N94UD East Lancs Omnidekkas were originally to be Wright bodied. Given the N94UD itself is regarded as quite a solid chassis i do wonder what a Wright bodied version would be like given the Omnidekka body isn't exactly the most solid things...
What other bodies were produced for the N94UD?The Pre-Facelift Gemini 3 is still built, albeit in fairly limited numbers.
Wrightbuses with the "U" shape windscreen are known as the "Millennium" design, while the more recent ones are the "Stealth" design.
I can't vouch for the accuracy of that story but it is one i've heard before too, supposedly First Scotland East's Scania N94UD East Lancs Omnidekkas were originally to be Wright bodied. Given the N94UD itself is regarded as quite a solid chassis i do wonder what a Wright bodied version would be like given the Omnidekka body isn't exactly the most solid things...
Except for them being highly prone to structural issues particularly around the rear end. At least two in the First Scotland East batch were withdrawn, off the road for 2-3 years and had to have full rear end rebuilds when only around 6 years old as the entire rear end was essentially coming apart. The Wessex batch were also withdrawn at very short notice a few years back due to corrosion issues.Nothing wrong with the Omnidekka body. It’s alusuisse construction, similar to Wrights.
I think the only other examples of N94s in the UK are the one off Castrosua City bodied example and a small number of East Lancs Omnitowns which were essentially just a single deck Omnidekka.What other bodies were produced for the N94UD?