• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Eclipse Gemini vs Gemini

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

scosutsut

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2019
Messages
933
Location
scosutsut
Hi, what's the difference between a Wright Eclipse Gemini 3 and a Wright Gemini 3?
Edited completely as I was wrong but don't want to leave the confusing post.

My understanding is the Eclipse Gemini 3 is the double decker usually on B5TL or B5LH chassis.

The single deck from the same time period is the Eclipse 3 (on B8RLE chassis) - I assume the Eclipse Gemini name was to try and make them seen as a related "family" of options. Wikipedia states that the Eclipse name was to coincide with the Solar Eclipse in its year of launch.

Most people wouldn't use the "Eclipse" part of the name when talking about the double deckers, instead taking about Eclipse (single deck) and Gemini (double deck) hence when it does appear it is confusing, so much so my original answer to this post got them the wrong way round! Wright have a reasonable history of confusing product names and this demonstrates it nicely!

The GB Hawk and Streetdeck integral single deck and double deck designs offered by Wright's these days appear to have huge amounts in common, in terms of outward design, so it can often be hard to tell at a glance what you are looking at.

If you pop these names into Flickr or Google Imagesearch it should help get a feel for the types and who operates them.
 
Last edited:

Grahamk748

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2020
Messages
16
Location
Rushden
I thought the Eclipse name was just dropped to simplify when the 3 came out. Gemini basically being Latin for twin ie twin deck was only used for double decker not single deckers.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,172
Location
West Wiltshire
I thought the Eclipse name was just dropped to simplify when the 3 came out. Gemini basically being Latin for twin ie twin deck was only used for double decker not single deckers.

Thats how I understand it, actually there was a period where Gemini 3 bodies were built with older style Gemini 2 fronts (2013-2015) and the Eclipse part of the name seems to have been dropped during that time.

I think Dublin bus specified the old style front for few more years
 

scosutsut

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2019
Messages
933
Location
scosutsut
Absolutely spot on guys, I've amended my original reply to avoid confusion. I answered this far too early!
 

gledhill56

Member
Joined
12 Nov 2007
Messages
90
I believe the name variations applied to the type of chassis that was bodied.
Eclipse was for Volvo
Solar was for Scania
Pulsar was for VDL/DAF
Gemini was only added for double deck vehicles.
 

GusB

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
6,595
Location
Elginshire
There is a bit of logic to the naming.

When first introduced, Eclipse was the name used for bodies that were built on Volvo chassis. Solar was the equivalent name for bodies built on Scania chassis. Pulsar was used on DAF/VDL.

Then you had the Eclipse Fusion (Volvo) and Solar Fusion (Scania), which were built on articulated chassis.

Gemini was used for double decks, so a Volvo would have an Eclipse Gemini body. There was a Pulsar Gemini as well. Had Wright's built a double deck on Scania chassis, logically it would have been the Solar Gemini.

Removal of the Eclipse name would suggest there isn't a bit of Volvo underneath.

Edit: @gledhill56 posted as I was typing and has confirmed this.
 

calcium

Member
Joined
17 May 2022
Messages
9
Location
London
Thanks so much everyone for clearing the confusion!

I'm new to the forums and buses overall (at least in this sort of sense) and I find it so amazing that there are a lot of people passionate about buses - I know nobody IRL myself who is haha
 

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,218
Location
Clydebank
I believe the name variations applied to the type of chassis that was bodied.
Eclipse was for Volvo
Solar was for Scania
Pulsar was for VDL/DAF
Gemini was only added for double deck vehicles.
Quite a bit more sense to be made there as opposed to the Wright 'Classic' range.

Oh, and you can add Meridian to that list for the few (well, 28) single-deck bodies Wright built on MAN NL273F chassis in the back half of the 2000s (attached images are my own).

52081983137_8998c7d510_c.jpg

52083508945_a19e5da8f9_c.jpg

Gemini was used for double decks, so a Volvo would have an Eclipse Gemini body. There was a Pulsar Gemini as well. Had Wright's built a double deck on Scania chassis, logically it would have been the Solar Gemini.
Didn't Wright have some significant issues with marrying the Gemini body to the Scania double-deck chassis of the period (N94 I think it was), thus the Solar Gemini never saw the light of day?
 
Last edited:

stevenedin

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2021
Messages
1,164
Location
Edinburgh
Last edited:

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,218
Location
Clydebank
Oh, and you can add Meridian to that list for the few (well, 28) single-deck bodies Wright built on MAN NL273F chassis in the back half of the 2000s (attached images are my own).
Another factoid that I completely overlooked is that the first Wright-bodied buses for Hong Kong (a total of 100 Volvo B10TLs aka Super Olympians for Kowloon Motor Bus, the first examples entering service in November 2003) had a version of the Gemini body that was known, at least at first, as the Wright Explorer (attached images copyright of gakei.com).

281av3.jpg

Think it's fair to say that Wright managed the cleanest/best-looking result with the Super Olympian's off-side radiator than either Alexander or Volgern did, though that's likely not saying too much!

The rear-end styling treatment on these particular 'Super Olys' is worthy of note too:

avw301.jpg
 
Last edited:

Jordan Adam

Established Member
Joined
12 Sep 2017
Messages
5,527
Location
Aberdeen
Thats how I understand it, actually there was a period where Gemini 3 bodies were built with older style Gemini 2 fronts (2013-2015) and the Eclipse part of the name seems to have been dropped during that time.

I think Dublin bus specified the old style front for few more years
Lothian have 24 of these types as well.

They had a demonstrator back in 2014 https://www.flickr.com/photos/steveneh8/13976926390/in/dateposted/
The Pre-Facelift Gemini 3 is still built, albeit in fairly limited numbers.

Wrightbuses with the "U" shape windscreen are known as the "Millennium" design, while the more recent ones are the "Stealth" design.
Didn't Wright have some significant issues with marrying the Gemini body to the Scania double-deck chassis of the period (N94 I think it was), thus the Solar Gemini never saw the light of day?
I can't vouch for the accuracy of that story but it is one i've heard before too, supposedly First Scotland East's Scania N94UD East Lancs Omnidekkas were originally to be Wright bodied. Given the N94UD itself is regarded as quite a solid chassis i do wonder what a Wright bodied version would be like given the Omnidekka body isn't exactly the most solid things...
 

Cesarcollie

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2016
Messages
538
The Pre-Facelift Gemini 3 is still built, albeit in fairly limited numbers.

Wrightbuses with the "U" shape windscreen are known as the "Millennium" design, while the more recent ones are the "Stealth" design.

I can't vouch for the accuracy of that story but it is one i've heard before too, supposedly First Scotland East's Scania N94UD East Lancs Omnidekkas were originally to be Wright bodied. Given the N94UD itself is regarded as quite a solid chassis i do wonder what a Wright bodied version would be like given the Omnidekka body isn't exactly the most solid things...

Nothing wrong with the Omnidekka body. It’s alusuisse construction, similar to Wrights.
 

hst43102

Member
Joined
28 May 2019
Messages
949
Location
Tyneside
The Pre-Facelift Gemini 3 is still built, albeit in fairly limited numbers.

Wrightbuses with the "U" shape windscreen are known as the "Millennium" design, while the more recent ones are the "Stealth" design.

I can't vouch for the accuracy of that story but it is one i've heard before too, supposedly First Scotland East's Scania N94UD East Lancs Omnidekkas were originally to be Wright bodied. Given the N94UD itself is regarded as quite a solid chassis i do wonder what a Wright bodied version would be like given the Omnidekka body isn't exactly the most solid things...
What other bodies were produced for the N94UD?
 

Jordan Adam

Established Member
Joined
12 Sep 2017
Messages
5,527
Location
Aberdeen
Nothing wrong with the Omnidekka body. It’s alusuisse construction, similar to Wrights.
Except for them being highly prone to structural issues particularly around the rear end. At least two in the First Scotland East batch were withdrawn, off the road for 2-3 years and had to have full rear end rebuilds when only around 6 years old as the entire rear end was essentially coming apart. The Wessex batch were also withdrawn at very short notice a few years back due to corrosion issues.

That aside they're also just highly unpleasant vehicles to travel on as a passenger.
What other bodies were produced for the N94UD?
I think the only other examples of N94s in the UK are the one off Castrosua City bodied example and a small number of East Lancs Omnitowns which were essentially just a single deck Omnidekka.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top