Interesting photos, I do appreciate the one of the first train to use the Eastern Bore especially as I am too young to remember it being in use prior to the last remodelling of Kings Cross.
It will. The re-signalling in the 1970s that took it out of use had to be completed before the station could be electrified.Once the work is completed, will this be the first time that the reinstated tunnel has been electrified?
Reappraised following the post by @8stewartt 12 Mar.Many thanks
Next to Foulness Island, leading to the newspaper headline "Campaign formed to promote Foulness".It was proposed at one time as the start of a high speed shuttle service to a new London main airport on Maplin Sands near Southend.
Next to Foulness Island, leading to the newspaper headline "Campaign formed to promote Foulness".
What a great headline. I'd forgotten about Maplin: I seem to remember they even started moving earth before the plug was pulled on the project. A much later, but nearby project was the "Boris Island" airport idea, which didn't happen either.
Thanks to edwin_m for the answer about electrification of the "new" tunnel at Kings Cross: it's good to see a piece of disused railway infrastructure returned to use; even better when it's also being electrified for the first time!
Interesting photos, I do appreciate the one of the first train to use the Eastern Bore especially as I am too young to remember it being in use prior to the last remodelling of Kings Cross.
‘High speed’ to get trains out of the station relatively quickly to increase movement ability?There'll be a set of points out of sight behind the workers. The middle two rails are getting closer towards the camera, with the crossing behind the camera. I think the overall length means it’s a relatively high speed crossover, and I think based on other photos it is roughly either underneath or near the HS1 overbridge, between the two sets of tunnels.
Quite a bit of traffic to/ from the fast lines for Platforms 8-10 will go over those points (including all departing trains) hence the need to get trains through the conflicting movement area as quickly as possible.‘High speed’ to get trains out of the station relatively quickly to increase movement ability?
I think it’s also the obvious route for “down slow” trains to take an alternative route to avoid up Thameslink trains using Canal Tunnel, then rejoining the down slow north of Copenhagen tunnels. The possibility of using that move was mentioned earlier in this thread...Quite a bit of traffic to/ from the fast lines for Platforms 8-10 will go over those points (including all departing trains) hence the need to get trains through the conflicting movement area as quickly as possible.
You're effectively replacing a compact but slow station throat layout by one which has similar functionality but is longer and faster. The higher speed balances the longer length, so that each train probably blocks conflicting moves for about the same time as before as it passes over the throat. The capacity of the layout therefore ends up being similar (in fact probably a bit better, as this is part of the work to create an extra hourly ECML path). The faster turnouts are more expensive but they eliminate the double slips and other high-maintenance items in the old layout, so there's probably a maintenance saving overall as well as a few seconds off the journey time.‘High speed’ to get trains out of the station relatively quickly to increase movement ability?
Potentially getting very off topic for this thread now, but AIUI the route was to be from a new dedicated Kings Cross airport station on the goods yards north of the canal roughly where the recent major developments are, with the route passing over the 4 track approach to Kings Cross and then using the eastern bore of Copenhagen tunnel only, up towards Finsbury Park, then heading east somehow. So not using the east bore of Gasworks as is now being discussed.What route was thought up for getting from KX out to Southend? There's no obvious connection I can think of, and surely they wouldn't have been thinking of tunnelling under half of London from the KX area back in those days??
Post #3 has the before/after layouts but doesn't have speeds marked.I haven't time to look back through all 315 posts but someone did post before and after diagrams for the work including the present and future (much increased ) speed limits
@whoosh posted a summary of the revised speeds in text form, they’re in his post #191.Post #3 has the before/after layouts but doesn't have speeds marked.
Ok and thanks for putting that right, that makes more sense. I can see now that the picture in post #299 is further round towards the north, because in the very left hand side of the shot we can see the brick pier for the NLL overbridge. I’ll put a correction in my earlier post.Correction. The photo in post 299 is taken looking towards kings cross. The points being the ones nearest the station on the next crossover down on the highlighted image. The picture in post 304 is the country end of the highlighted crossover. The KX end of those set of points doesn’t go in until the 7-11 blockade I believe. All new track on the bottom 4 lines is now installed awaiting welding apart from the station throat area.
The new layout has a greatly improved functionality rather than being just a faster and cheaper to maintain equivalent.You're effectively replacing a compact but slow station throat layout by one which has similar functionality but is longer and faster. The higher speed balances the longer length, so that each train probably blocks conflicting moves for about the same time as before as it passes over the throat. The capacity of the layout therefore ends up being similar (in fact probably a bit better, as this is part of the work to create an extra hourly ECML path). The faster turnouts are more expensive but they eliminate the double slips and other high-maintenance items in the old layout, so there's probably a maintenance saving overall as well as a few seconds off the journey time.
The new layout has a greatly improved functionality rather than being just a faster and cheaper to maintain equivalent.
In the old layout, depending on other moves, it was common for main line services to use the westernmost bore of Copenhagen Tunnels and thus conflict with Thameslink and GN services. Although such routeing will still be possible the new layout will effectively provide dedicated 'fast' lines throughout.