DerekC
Established Member
Oh dear. Well, despite the obvious risk of Nidd-space expanding via the new Thames Tideway Tunnel to fill the whole of Kent, we must go to Island Gardens to monitor the ebb tide, just in case.
I see your Waterloo and raise you Waterloo EastI've been pondering for a few days now, wondering where we should move to next. It's a tricky one, but seeing as any moves to the north would risk us breaching rule 8 of the 1602 (revised edition) rulebook, I'm thinking the only safe place is Waterloo.
-Peter
Just for what it's worth I believe that Barry Cryer successfully challenged that rule, on the basis that the nurses always steal your trousers....I am shocked to the safety boots. Rule 1(a)(iii) makes clear that trouserless travel is a fundamental breach for which the penalty is permanent and irrevocable banishment to the Waterloo & City Line. On which basis I have no choice but to go in dudgeon to deepest Bank.
On a point of order, there is no evidence whatever that nurses were in any way involved in the initial detrousering. However I acknowledge the general validity of your thesis and having no particular wish to delay matters will move rapidly on to Mitcham JunctionJust for what it's worth I believe that Barry Cryer successfully challenged that rule, on the basis that the nurses always steal your trousers....
I don't think that invalidates your move however, so I will continue from Peter C's Embankment, and take a fast service to Petts Wood.
On a point of order, there is no evidence whatever that nurses were in any way involved in the initial detrousering. However I acknowledge the general validity of your thesis and having no particular wish to delay matters will move rapidly on to Mitcham Junction
Harlesden? What the hell are you playing at??!?If you’re getting all legal, I raise the Metropolitan Police Act 1839 - Harlesden.
Oak is a tree, so as treason was one of three crimes punishable with the death penelty after it was abolished for murder, and arson to her majesty's shipyards was another, we've found ourselves outside London at Dockyard in Plymouth
If only you had been a little more up to date! Fotheringay's District Line Rules were declared contrary to the Geneva Convention as early as 1932 and would certainly now be subject to challenge under the Human Rights Acts of 1998 and 2004 as well as the Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 and probably the Street Drainage Act 1974. So I am afraid we cannot linger at Earls Court. To avoid local vigilantes we must move quickly to Galleons Reach
All this talk of woofers means I'll have to urgently buy new speakers, so a move to Osterley seems appropriate - unless it contravenes the Noise Emission Regulations 2001?1899 is up to date enough for me so I'm (of to) Barking.
I'm afraid it does. The only new speakers permitted (with silencers attached) are all accumulated at Hyde Park Corner.All this talk of woofers means I'll have to urgently buy new speakers, so a move to Osterley seems appropriate - unless it contravenes the Noise Emission Regulations 2001?
At Cockfosters, we get the tube to King's Cross & St Pancras International
Hmm. Time to consult a little known work by Capt. W E Johns, Biggles Does the Underground and see what my aviator hero would do....................................Ah - the move direct! I sense a worthy opponent so some thought is needed. Stovold's Imperial Bypass move with sprinkles and cream on top should do it. Waddon Marsh. Now get out of that!!
That's superficially a very clever move, but a biplane would have trouble in the deep tube. I counter quickly with something less pretentious. Lewisham