telstarbox
Established Member
Here is the graph from DfT data, updated to the 8 November. Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/transport-use-during-the-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic
Last edited:
Is it likely that rail usage and ticket sales will be back to normal levels by Spring?
If not then what does it mean for ticket offices and travel centres?
The way you pose the question is regrettably not the general public's idea of buying travel services going forward, not as far as trains are concerned at least. I think physical tickets and places that sell them are going to be increasingly knackered. The reboot of rail traffic needs innovative and easy to understand means of paying for train travel and it is no secret to those that read the posts I favour 'year zero' fares reform.Is it likely that rail usage and ticket sales will be back to normal levels by Spring?
If not then what does it mean for ticket offices and travel centres?
I’m saying that fare evasion is pretty much the norm during covid.Fare evasion existed before Covid though. As DOO services around London carry a disproportionate number of the passenger total compared to the number of trains running, it might not be that much higher than the sales data suggests.
Is it likely that rail usage and ticket sales will be back to normal levels by Spring?
If not then what does it mean for ticket offices and travel centres?
I’m saying that fare evasion is pretty much the norm during covid.
if you’re getting off at an station without ticket barriers why would you pay for a ticket for a journey you have already made.
No-ones checking tickets on trains, I guarantee the real number of passengers is much higher.
The interesting thing about comparing the relative fortunes of motoring and rail travel during the pandemic is that the motoring scene must be eating itself to maintain its relatively strong showing.Not quite - the graph only covered up to where data has been fully tallied. There is another week available, but that always gets revised upwards the following week.
I can add the motor vehicle line for comparison:
Blue shows All Motor Vehicles and Orange shows Rail Tickets Sold.
Are rail services being reduced next year? I’ve heard talk of a 20% reduction but I can’t find anything concrete.
As is standard every year, there are no train services running on Christmas Day and only a very limited number of services running on a small number of routes on Boxing Day.
But for the days passengers can travel, they are being urged to book ahead and avoid busy times due to the combination of reduced capacity and the limited travel window. And some operators will prevent passengers from boarding without a pre-booked ticket.
There have already been reports of advance tickets selling out or going for exorbitant prices.
Think there's some discussion here regarding Dec '20 timetable. Each TOC doing it slightly differently; I know GWR is increasing to almost the Dec '19 timetable again, yet Southeastern is running essentially a Saturday service. Northern is running a reduced service on some routes.
Regarding Christmas, there's already a lot of talk about long-distance trains being sold out, although many fares are not yet available. Plus the inevitable challenge of explaining engineering works booked 12-18 months in advance.
Travelling at Christmas: What you need to know
How will UK transport be affected by the five-day relaxation of Covid restrictions over Christmas?www.bbc.co.uk
Not entirely true - many staff are now back to revenue duty again and indeed, I was on a last train out of Leeds to one of my local stations on Sunday and the guard did a walk through checking (not that there were many to check!)
TPE have been checking onboard since August. They were one of the first operators to restart onboard checks.Also went on one TPE train. No check on that - don't know what their current policy is.
Brighton had a one-way system for many months where arriving passengers were directed to exits either side of the gateline. I actually overheard a loud youth on his phone saying ‘nah, Bro, you won’t need one, you don’t go through no barriers’. I’m sure word soon got around in the summer months.I’m saying that fare evasion is pretty much the norm during covid.
if you’re getting off at an station without ticket barriers why would you pay for a ticket for a journey you have already made.
Brighton had a one-way system for many months where arriving passengers were directed to exits either side of the gateline. I actually overheard a loud youth on his phone saying ‘nah, Bro, you won’t need one, you don’t go through no barriers’. I’m sure word soon got around in the summer months.
Anyone know of other examples where a one-way system was devised that took no account of the potential for fare evasion?
Screenshot as described in quoted text aboveAccording to Apple Maps data, the return of rail travel enquiries is much more rapid than that from lockdown mk1. More of a step change this time than a gradual ramping up as previously.
Sorry I cannot grab the graph and post it here, they seem to do something clever in the webpage so that the chart is not an actual image, but I am sure the official figures will show a sudden jump back to around 30% when the data is compiled.
According to Apple Maps data, the return of rail travel enquiries is much more rapid than that from lockdown mk1. More of a step change this time than a gradual ramping up as previously.
Sorry I cannot grab the graph and post it here, they seem to do something clever in the webpage so that the chart is not an actual image, but I am sure the official figures will show a sudden jump back to around 30% when the data is compiled.
Didn't Peterborough have a one way system where you exited via the side gate instead of going via the barriers?
I would imagine there was a good number of tickets sold to Hove/Preston Park/London Road from Brighton for fare dodgers to bypass the barriers at Brighton, assuming they were heading to a station without barriers