• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Rail travel - a luxury?

Status
Not open for further replies.

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,161
I far prefer the counted place system of reservations where one can choose where to sit according to the circumstances at the time.
I've been against reservations for some time. For a start they penalise those paying full fare disproportionately as they are less likely to reserve a seat (as they've likely got a need for flexible travel).

I would abolish reservations for all tickets and replace it with a "guaranteed seat" scheme which would be a charge for extra.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,531
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I've been against reservations for some time. For a start they penalise those paying full fare disproportionately as they are less likely to reserve a seat (as they've likely got a need for flexible travel).

Though having reserved coaches allows them to use their phone to reserve at the last minute.

I would abolish reservations for all tickets and replace it with a "guaranteed seat" scheme which would be a charge for extra.

How would that work? (Maybe one for another thread?)

On SE commuter services that's basically called "First Class".
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,161
Though having reserved coaches allows them to use their phone to reserve at the last minute.



How would that work? (Maybe one for another thread?)

On SE commuter services that's basically called "First Class".
It would work the same way it used to back in BR days, when you paid extra for a reservation! The quota control on "booked train only" seats per train would be the same as now, just there would be no guarantee you'd get a seat and you wouldn't be allocated a seat number.

We need to get away from the sort of nonsense that prevents long distance XC passengers being unable to travel/book a cheaper ticket simply because half a Plymouth-Newcastle service has seats booked Bristol TM-Bristol Parkway.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,531
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It would work the same way it used to back in BR days, when you paid extra for a reservation! The quota control on "booked train only" seats per train would be the same as now, just there would be no guarantee you'd get a seat and you wouldn't be allocated a seat number.

I'm really confused now. You said a "guaranteed seat scheme". "Counted places" does not guarantee a seat. How would the "guaranteed seat scheme" work other than by (optionally) reserving one?

I do think Advances should have a reservation, though, other than the sort of "edge case" below. The reason is that unlike a walk-up ticket I have no choice to say "this train is too busy, I'm going to take a different one".

We need to get away from the sort of nonsense that prevents long distance XC passengers being unable to travel/book a cheaper ticket simply because half a Plymouth-Newcastle service has seats booked Bristol TM-Bristol Parkway.

There are a number of possible solutions to that that don't involve losing the benefit of seat selection and reservation.

1. German-style, don't allow (or charge a hefty fare for) local travel on IC services except where there is no local alternative. On DB, this is usually handled by running ICs as REs for part of their journey where there is no alternative.

2. Don't allow reservations for short journeys, but do have them for longer ones. I agree stuff like this (and Manchester Oxford Road-Manchester Piccadilly, which sometimes happens) is silly.

3. Provide XC enough capacity.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,161
I'm really confused now. You said a "guaranteed seat scheme". "Counted places" does not guarantee a seat. How would the "guaranteed seat scheme" work other than by (optionally) reserving one?
By optionally reserving one for an extra fee. It’s exactly what happened under BR, and should be easy to implement on web booking systems and apps.
I do think Advances should have a reservation, though, other than the sort of "edge case" below. The reason is that unlike a walk-up ticket I have no choice to say "this train is too busy, I'm going to take a different one".
Why should they have a reservation? Operators that don’t have seat reservations manage to offer booked train only tickets.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,531
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Why should they have a reservation? Operators that don’t have seat reservations manage to offer booked train only tickets.

I said why :)

Because if I'm on a walk up ticket and not in a hurry and the intended train pulls in and has no spare seats, I will take a different one. An Advance does not offer me that option, so an accompanying reservation is sensible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top