MCR247
Established Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 9,596
Been happening a fair bit with XC 170s struggling for availability recentlyEven Cross Country cancelled a Nottingham train yesterday, (Wednesday)
Been happening a fair bit with XC 170s struggling for availability recentlyEven Cross Country cancelled a Nottingham train yesterday, (Wednesday)
I'd be surprised if it was a Nottingham - Matlock service on Saturday. Real Time Trains and the EMR journey planner show the weekday timetable continuing into next week (Derby - Matlock only) so maybe the Saturday changes have not been inputted yet?I'm looking at making a Nottingham to Matlock trip this Saturday and according to the temporary timetable I need to change at Derby. However when I check times using the EMR journey planner it shows direct trains running as per the original timetable. Does anyone know which is correct?
I'd be surprised if it was a Nottingham - Matlock service on Saturday. Real Time Trains and the EMR journey planner show the weekday timetable continuing into next week (Derby - Matlock only) so maybe the Saturday changes have not been inputted yet?
Looking on the Engineering Works page this is at the bottom of the page. Has the date for the end of the 'temporary' timetable as the 11/12/21.
View attachment 99117
Its an issue with the journey planner, the Train line will also allow you to book services that no longer exist sometimes.Thank you. I think your right and the journey planner is wrong. It's disappointing that the correct times are not showing less than two days before.
Nottingham Trams are busy enough as it is! - The park and ride sites are quiet though, traffic is lighter so anyone who could already drive is probably driving all the way in. The people this will worst affect are those who can't drive to places.I suspect Nottingham Trams are doing quite well with the extra custom with people ditching the railways and driving to the P&R sites (Hucknall etc)
Could you clarify what the current EMR situation has to do with the pausing of electrification? The inter city lines have new bi-mode trains on order but seem to be doing OK with the 222s (and the 180s) for the time being and have been simplified by the completion of electrification to Corby.Another absolute cock up at the hands of the DfT. Since all the electrification got binned everywhere, the industry has been scrambling to cobble together a functional rolling stock strategy. Of course, every time Schapps comes out and lies that they are doing something they are clearly not, this just worsens the situation.
How can it take them six months to sort this out? They moved to May TT change and tried to make it work so presumably they thought they could manage the resource limitations but then instigate the cutbacks when it was clear they couldn't. The least they should be doing is being called to account by local politicians to explain what action they are taking to sort out the deficiencies on each route affected and by when.I'd be surprised if it was a Nottingham - Matlock service on Saturday. Real Time Trains and the EMR journey planner show the weekday timetable continuing into next week (Derby - Matlock only) so maybe the Saturday changes have not been inputted yet?
Looking on the Engineering Works page this is at the bottom of the page. Has the date for the end of the 'temporary' timetable as the 11/12/21.
View attachment 99117
Set expectations low and then it's easy to exceed them...How can it take them six months to sort this out? They moved to May TT change and tried to make it work so presumably they thought they could manage the resource limitations but then instigate the cutbacks when it was clear they couldn't. The least they should be doing is being called to account by local politicians to explain what action they are taking to sort out the deficiencies on each route affected and by when.
Indeed but hardly putting the customer first and why commit to the May TT change only to have to admit defeat within a few weeks.Set expectations low and then it's easy to exceed them...
- A modern passenger experience.
Well, TOCs don't exist on an island, they rely on receiving rolling stock from other parts of the country. Pretty sure the old 15X units are going to Northern (which had loads of electrification cancelled), which has reduced rolling stock short term.Could you clarify what the current EMR situation has to do with the pausing of electrification? The inter city lines have new bi-mode trains on order but seem to be doing OK with the 222s (and the 180s) for the time being and have been simplified by the completion of electrification to Corby.
The undoubted problems seem to all about the regional services that were never in scope for electrification at this juncture.
So the delay/cancellation of the Windermere, Westhoughton and Stalybridge lines wiring has sucked enough 15x out of EMR to cause (or at least exacerbate) their current Regional problems?Well, TOCs don't exist on an island, they rely on receiving rolling stock from other parts of the country. Pretty sure the old 15X units are going to Northern (which had loads of electrification cancelled), which has reduced rolling stock short term.
Is anything regularly timetabled to use platform 7?Surprised that emr aren't using platform 7 for the derby to matlock, surely this would free up 4 5 6 for the London , Crewe and Sheffield services
No, design limitations if I recall correctly. It can be used for terminators but not continuing/starting passenger services. Can't remember why I'm afraid.Is anything regularly timetabled to use platform 7?
Passenger trains can't use 7 without special arrangements in place, as it's not protected (by trap points etc.) against anything coming off Etches Park without authority.Surprised that emr aren't using platform 7 for the derby to matlock, surely this would free up 4 5 6 for the London , Crewe and Sheffield services
Most Matlock's are using platforms 3B/4B which would normally see little or no use in the day now the Crewe services go to Newark. The occasional one goes on 5B and the 1633 on 2 for some reason. As stated above platform 7 can't be used without special arrangements in place.Surprised that emr aren't using platform 7 for the derby to matlock, surely this would free up 4 5 6 for the London , Crewe and Sheffield services
Nottingham - Matlock - Runs Derby - Matlock only. First Cross Country service towards Nottingham is not until 1233!
In general, when there is industrial action, other TOCs are reluctant to alter their services. This tends to be seen as strike-breaking (and was the case pre privatisation IIRC).They say to use Cross Country services between Nottingham and Derby but on a Sunday these do not stop at Beeston, Attenborough or Long Eaton.
Beeston and Long Eaton will still get London trains stopping but Attenborough has effectively had it's Sunday service removed.
And its had its weekday services pretty much removed by the regional cuts as well.They say to use Cross Country services between Nottingham and Derby but on a Sunday these do not stop at Beeston, Attenborough or Long Eaton.
Beeston and Long Eaton will still get London trains stopping but Attenborough has effectively had it's Sunday service removed.
For the last few months, CrossCountry have altered their 4 services to/from Aberdeen on Sundays so they stop at most stops between Haymarket and Aberdeen (the calls were removed in July 2020) due to the action by ScotRail staff.In general, when there is industrial action, other TOCs are reluctant to alter their services. This tends to be seen as strike-breaking (and was the case pre privatisation IIRC).
170's were used on the line back in Central Trains days and I don't remember them being late. Either their performance has deteriorated or the timetables have less slack than they used to. I'd have thought that the door positions on the 170's would speed up station dwell times on a stopping service, rather than slow them down. Again, in Central Trains days I don't remember door opening and closing procedures causing any problems.I was chatting to a friend who is an EMR guard and I asked him why? His immediate answer was it’s the 170’s they can’t keep time with them. The gradients on the line, especially up through Bulwell, Hucknall and Newstead, along with frequent stops are creating a problem. He said that perhaps the units are just not in very good condition but they are not coping very well. He also added that time is also easily lost at stations with the door opening and closing procedures etc.
I can’t remember them being late back in Central Trains days either, but they are now, and something must be causing it. It’s got even worse this afternoon than it was this morning. Trains are leaving Nottingham on time, and losing about 2 minutes by each station and by the time they to Kirkby in Ashfield they are around 8 or 9 minutes late. Trains travelling south have been even worse today with delays of up to 15 minutes. This is when they are running an hourly service and as I said previously, this is happening nearly every day. You cannot any longer rely on them if you need a connection at Nottingham.170's were used on the line back in Central Trains days and I don't remember them being late. Either their performance has deteriorated or the timetables have less slack than they used to. I'd have thought that the door positions on the 170's would speed up station dwell times on a stopping service, rather than slow them down. Again, in Central Trains days I don't remember door opening and closing procedures causing any problems.
The 170s, as far as I can see, are simply not suitable for this line where stations are only a couple of miles apart. I’m no expert but I take on board the comments of people more knowledgeable than I, and I simply cannot see the need for an 100mph unit which thrives on longer distances between stops. Lower top speed but better acceleration is needed on this line, maybe 158s would be ideal. The problem is, of course, exacerbated byThe revised EMR reduced timetables have now been operating for 4 weeks. How do people think it’s going?
I can only comment on what I have seen on the Robin Hood Line and these are my views. There certainly have not been anywhere near so many cancellations but time keeping is not improving. Almost every train throughout the day runs a few minutes late. Just looking at this morning, using Hucknall as an example, every train has been late departing by a few minutes, some around 6 or 7 minutes late with one delay of 14 minutes. The current hourly service is now has delays like this every single day, yet it wasn’t like this even when the half hourly service was operating for 20+ years pre covid.
I was chatting to a friend who is an EMR guard and I asked him why? His immediate answer was it’s the 170’s they can’t keep time with them. The gradients on the line, especially up through Bulwell, Hucknall and Newstead, along with frequent stops are creating a problem. He said that perhaps the units are just not in very good condition but they are not coping very well. He also added that time is also easily lost at stations with the door opening and closing procedures etc.
I also note that the 2200 from Nottingham to Worksop tonight is cancelled. There is a replacement bus but I really cannot see why, even calling at all stations, it’s going to take nearly 3 hours to get to Worksop, not arriving until 0049.