In respect of the TAM lines (the ones where the debate over DOO operation is relevant), it's hard to see how you can double the frequency of services without doubling the headcount allocated to those services.
Drivers yes as they’ll be a required resource long term, conductor / guards on the other hand aren’t needed in their current form. The CVL is very much in line to become an oversized tram line network the all the cost savings thats brings.
Blackpool run with conductors on every tram but their sole role is ticket collection, I can see the CVL conductors going the same way unfortunately. No way you’ll have CVL conductors on £47k lob term it just doesn’t add up.
This document on the RMT website appears to confirm that safety-critical guards' duties will remain when the 398s and 756s are introduced on the CVL.
This document must not be shared without the permission of tfw….rmt share document for everyone to read.
They certainly want their monies worth for the 47k pa! The method of working looks very much like the Greater Anglia method, not surprising considering the traction is a sister of train.
Like I say I really hope I’m wrong when it comes to the long term future of rhe guard on CVL, but being a 25 year veteran of underhand dealings I won’t hold my breath on this one.
