Most stations will be named after the place in which they reside in. Some stations get named and then the surrounding area adopts the name (Clapham Junction etc), but are there any stations which have names which bear no geographical resemblance to the area whatsoever? For example a station which happens to be named after a historical figure or generic building but with no mention of the place name.
Two examples of such stations are University and the now closed IBM Halt. Without underlying geographical knowledge, neither of these give the average traveller an idea of where they are located, and would only be solved if a place name suffix was added. Other examples include James Cook and King George V on the DLR, although both of these have structures named after them so may not be so geographically inaccurate.
Two examples of such stations are University and the now closed IBM Halt. Without underlying geographical knowledge, neither of these give the average traveller an idea of where they are located, and would only be solved if a place name suffix was added. Other examples include James Cook and King George V on the DLR, although both of these have structures named after them so may not be so geographically inaccurate.