If a world where government wants to protect its citizens from harm is madness then something is severely wrong.
Governments wanting to protect their population from harm is quite natural.
But Australasia's single-minded obsession with stopping Covid - regardless of the resultant harms - is madness. Even with their low vaccination and immunity rates.
Then there are the utterly pointless restrictions they've introduced, e.g. outdoor playgrounds being shut ("it's a lockdown, how dare kids have fun") and masks being mandatory
outdoors. We've been through much the same charade here and in wider Europe - to what benefit?
It's a 3 day lockdown to trace close contacts and stop the spread
If you really believe that, I have a bridge to sell you...
It's simply unsustainable to live or try to run a business in an environment where snap lockdowns (almost invariably lasting many times the promised initial length) are always on the cards.
And whilst this approach might nominally be popular with voters, would that still be the case if they realised what the alternatives were?
The abolition of restrictions in England - without the resultant consequences that all the doommongers had predicted - is going to make the case for new restrictions a lot harder here. Perhaps Australasia might take a leaf out of our book...