• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Why were the Deltics retired and not cascaded?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,167
I was amused to see in Roger Ford's latest Informed Sources e-preview:

Excellent! Two Deltic Engines at 4 tonnes each, plus a generator, cooler groups, exhaust, fuel system and a full fuel tank, I’m guessing about 25tonnes?

Using the Tesla 3 energy density of 150Wh/kg of battery pack (not just the batteries), gives you a 3.75MWh capacity. That’s an hour and a half at full power, which in reality means about 3 hours range, allowing for coasting, operating on less than full power, and some regen.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,067
Using the Tesla 3 energy density of 150Wh/kg of battery pack (not just the batteries), gives you a 3.75MWh capacity. That’s an hour and a half at full power, which in reality means about 3 hours range, allowing for coasting, operating on less than full power, and some regen.
I have some experience of a Tesla, and the actual range is about 60% of what the book says (not particularly critical of them, as petrol cars come out about the same compared to the manufacturers test drivers).
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,167
I have some experience of a Tesla, and the actual range is about 60% of what the book says (not particularly critical of them, as petrol cars come out about the same compared to the manufacturers test drivers).

I wasnt going, by range, but by battery capacity.

Range is determined by how you drive compared to WLTP benchmarks. I know people who usually beat ‘the book’, in both electric and ICE cars (myself included).
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,067
The HST wasn't double headed per se, but essentially the equivalent
They effectively took the Deltic concept and put half at each end of the train! Bigger engines too, of course
I always thought the HST was effectively putting an A4 on each end, facing opposite ways. There was even the space at the inner end of the power unit for the coal, and it had a corridor tender. Guard didn't like sitting there after they first came along, got too dirty in there ...
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,132
You only need one Deltic diesel - the late model ones were kicking out around 4400hp from a single 18-cylinder block
If you used one of those you could devote half the engine room to battery storage
 

CW2

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2020
Messages
1,922
Location
Crewe
Surely Deltics were cascaded onto the Liverpool route
No, they did occasionally work to Liverpool, but that was entirely ad-hoc. They were never diagrammed for that work.
 
Last edited:

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
2,947
Location
Sunny South Lancs
Surely Deltics were cascaded onto the Liverpool route
No, they did occasionally work to Liverpool, but that was entirely as-hoc. They were never diagrammed for that work.

Many of those Liverpool runs were effectively "running-in" turns from York depot, either after an exam or in preparation for an upcoming railtour turn. The thinking seemed to be that if the Deltic failed to perform properly it was less inconvenient to the total operation for it to happen on the Trans-Pennine route than on the ECML. Doubtful that such thinking would be applied today.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,876
Location
Nottingham
Many of those Liverpool runs were effectively "running-in" turns from York depot, either after an exam or in preparation for an upcoming railtour turn. The thinking seemed to be that if the Deltic failed to perform properly it was less inconvenient to the total operation for it to happen on the Trans-Pennine route than on the ECML. Doubtful that such thinking would be applied today.
A failed Deltic might also have been a long way from any depot that had experience of maintaining them. Perhaps it was to do with the climb up to Standedge being more of a test than anything on the ECML?

I remember hearing a strange sound in the middle of one night around 1977. At the time we lived one valley over from the Standedge route but I'd never heard a train from home. When we later moved to Scotland I realised it was the distinctive call of the Deltic, and even later I found out about their regular use on a Transpennine overnight parcels working.
 

CW2

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2020
Messages
1,922
Location
Crewe
The 21:50 York - Shrewsbury sometimes got a Deltic as far as Stockport, returning with the balancing 22:50 Shrewsbury - York, 00:50 or thereabouts off Stockport. The loco would come off at Leeds and work the 03:00 Leeds - Hull. This was a convenient way of getting a Deltic from York to Hull, to work a Hull - Kings Cross service. Again, not diagrammed, but a good bit of work by Control.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
2,947
Location
Sunny South Lancs
A failed Deltic might also have been a long way from any depot that had experience of maintaining them. Perhaps it was to do with the climb up to Standedge being more of a test than anything on the ECML?

Equally sending a Deltic to Liverpool pretty much guaranteed it would come back again as "borrowing" it would be pointless as no local crews could work it. A trip on the ECML would create a greater risk of the loco being purloined for something other than the return working.
 

kermit

Member
Joined
2 May 2011
Messages
592
Equally sending a Deltic to Liverpool pretty much guaranteed it would come back again as "borrowing" it would be pointless as no local crews could work it. A trip on the ECML would create a greater risk of the loco being purloined for something other than the return working.

Is there an opportunity here for a confessional thread from retired staff - "Rolling Stock I have Wilfully Nicked"?
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,765
Location
Devon

Inversnecky

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2021
Messages
581
Location
Scotland
Was it a case of being a relatively small fleet, requiring specialist maintenance? Plus high speed diesels of the era probably required more frequent overhaul than low or medium speed units. And I bet overhaul for a deltic engine was considerably more expensive than for something less exotic.

So lots of cost for relatively few locomotives which would mean running a mixed fleet on some routes, at a time when there was clearly a move towards units and away from hauled coaches anyway?

Something like that?
I think this was likely, as other classes were done away with for that reason.
 

EveningStar

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2016
Messages
188
Location
Deepest, darkest Northumberland
Equally sending a Deltic to Liverpool pretty much guaranteed it would come back again as "borrowing" it would be pointless as no local crews could work it. A trip on the ECML would create a greater risk of the loco being purloined for something other than the return working.
As an undergraduate in Liverpool at the time who would often gravitate to Lime Street, I noticed that sometimes the Deltic would 'slip' an hour on the diagram instead of returning on the next xx:05 departure, presumably because not all crews signed for Deltic's.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
2,947
Location
Sunny South Lancs
As an undergraduate in Liverpool at the time who would often gravitate to Lime Street, I noticed that sometimes the Deltic would 'slip' an hour on the diagram instead of returning on the next xx:05 departure, presumably because not all crews signed for Deltic's.

I think it depended on whether the inward driver required a break or not. I believe on one occasion the ER man duly ran the Deltic round after arriving at Lime Street and went for his break. This led to another loco having to be found which then topped the train with the Deltic heading east DIT. After that ER control took more care in communicating with their LMR colleagues!
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,783
Location
Herts
Deltics were rarely used on the Edinburgh to Kings Cross Freightliner , probably for balancing purposes.

A good friend , when power controller at Kings Cross many years ago , rostered one to a late evening Kings Cross - Hertford North commuter train , light engine back to the Park. The crew took it without any quibble.

Best of all - they were suggested as possible power for the Cambrian - yes - the Cambrian. Good idea maybe - did not go very far beyond a report.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,917
Location
Lancashire
Deltics were rarely used on the Edinburgh to Kings Cross Freightliner , probably for balancing purposes.

A good friend , when power controller at Kings Cross many years ago , rostered one to a late evening Kings Cross - Hertford North commuter train , light engine back to the Park. The crew took it without any quibble.

Best of all - they were suggested as possible power for the Cambrian - yes - the Cambrian. Good idea maybe - did not go very far beyond a report.
I don't think Deltics would've been suitable for use on the Cambrian Line, the low speed limit and weight restrictions on Barmouth Viaduct would've been the nail in the coffin.

Deltics are at home on a nice long flat stretch of line where they can get speeds of up to 100mph
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,783
Location
Herts
I don't think Deltics would've been suitable for use on the Cambrian Line, the low speed limit and weight restrictions on Barmouth Viaduct would've been the nail in the coffin.

Deltics are at home on a nice long flat stretch of line where they can get speeds of up to 100mph


I think it was really , not a serious plan at all. Maybe a once a day limited stop tourist train. Which would have been fine with appropriate rolling stock , scenic guide and so on.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,917
Location
Lancashire
I think it was really , not a serious plan at all. Maybe a once a day limited stop tourist train. Which would have been fine with appropriate rolling stock , scenic guide and so on.
I can just about remember when ScotRail sent out a Deltic and Mark 3 push pull set to Oban several times on special trains from Edinburgh
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,240
Location
St Albans
Yes, the mind boggles. Waterloo - Exeter? Sadly, not LST-IPS-NRW hourly expresses - 3300hp to flatten Brentwood Bank would have been a start, though clearly 86s, 90s and now 745s bring rather more than that to the party.
A standard class 309 consist could do better than a class 55 on the GEML.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,969
A similar thing could be asked about Class 52 "Westerns". They were only in frontline service 16 years when they were withdrawn in favour of 47's, 50's and HST's but this may have been because of the hydraulic factor.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,917
Location
Lancashire
A similar thing could be asked about Class 52 "Westerns". They were only in frontline service 16 years when they were withdrawn in favour of 47's, 50's and HST's but this may have been because of the hydraulic factor.
More that British Rail was eliminating the use of Steam Heat Boilers and moving to ETH, plus more coaching stock was air brake only
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,876
Location
Nottingham
More that British Rail was eliminating the use of Steam Heat Boilers and moving to ETH, plus more coaching stock was air brake only
Many classes had air brakes retrofitted so I imagine the Westerns could have been too. ETH might have been more difficult as a generator/alternator would be needed and the control system would have to produce enough volts in the ETH at the same time as keeping the engine working with the hydraulic transmission.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,917
Location
Lancashire
Many classes had air brakes retrofitted so I imagine the Westerns could have been too. ETH might have been more difficult as a generator/alternator would be needed and the control system would have to produce enough volts in the ETH at the same time as keeping the engine working with the hydraulic transmission.
I was thinking more about coaching stock, Mark 2F, Mark 3 and Sleeper stock require ETH for heat, air conditioning and lighting
 

Richard Scott

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
3,691
Many classes had air brakes retrofitted so I imagine the Westerns could have been too. ETH might have been more difficult as a generator/alternator would be needed and the control system would have to produce enough volts in the ETH at the same time as keeping the engine working with the hydraulic transmission.
All were dual braked bar 4, I believe.
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,132
Many classes had air brakes retrofitted so I imagine the Westerns could have been too. ETH might have been more difficult as a generator/alternator would be needed and the control system would have to produce enough volts in the ETH at the same time as keeping the engine working with the hydraulic transmission.
Some. if not all, of the Westerns WERE fitted with air brakes.
ETH was a non-starter though: no room in the bodyshell for a generator
 

marsker

Member
Joined
14 May 2020
Messages
104
Location
Marske-by-the-Sea
Getting back on topic, I remember when the deltics were being retired and feeling very sad about it. It had to be remembered though, that they were a small class of locomotives with a high maintenance reqirement. Their raison d etre was haulage of high value services where speed was a selling point. As such services were taken over by HSTs the commercial logic in retaining them vanished. I did, however, feel that there was a case for using them short term on London - Norwich services which were, at that time, being slowed by 15 minutes to take account of electrification works.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top