• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Used my friend's photo card to buy a travel card with student discount

Status
Not open for further replies.

edcys

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2017
Messages
7
I paid less than 150£, as fine.

this is what I had received from TFL

http://www.railforums.co.uk/showpost.php?p=2974257&postcount=35

I am asked to pay £600 and will receive a Formal Warning if I agree that I try to avoid any fare. The incident was that I used my friend's photo card to buy a travel card with student discount. But I am actually a student. I told them the situation and I told them a prosecution will affect my visa application. But it seems they want to charge me more because of the possible negative effect of a prosecution. I feel desperate.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
16,232
Location
0036
I think they want you to pay more due to the seriousness of your offence.

You have the choice to pay, or not to pay and have your day in court. As you say yourself, a conviction may impair your permission to remain in the country. You should take this into account.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,924
Location
Scotland
The incident was that I used my friend's photo card to buy a travel card with student discount. But I am actually a student.
Could I ask why you didn't get your own photo card? If you are a student then it would have been a simple matter. The TOC will want an answer to this question.
I told them the situation and I told them a prosecution will affect my visa application. But it seems they want to charge me more because of the possible negative effect of a prosecution.
The settlement amount has nothing to do with your visa application, it has to do with the seriousness of the offence. It's easy to get cards mixed up and attempt to tap in/out with the wrong card (the case you're making a comparison to). Your case is, basically, fraud and so will attract a higher fine if it goes to court.
I am asked to pay £600 and will receive a Formal Warning if I agree that I try to avoid any fare.
£600 is a bit on the high side, but not unreasonable for a case involving presenting someone else's photocard to purchase a ticket.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,924
Location
Scotland
Another question - how did this end up being a revenue protection case? What happened after you asked for the ticket? What were you asked and what did you tell them?
 

edcys

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2017
Messages
7
Could I ask why you didn't get your own photo card? If you are a student then it would have been a simple matter. The TOC will want an answer to this question.
The settlement amount has nothing to do with your visa application, it has to do with the seriousness of the offence. It's easy to get cards mixed up and attempt to tap in/out with the wrong card (the case you're making a comparison to). Your case is, basically, fraud and so will attract a higher fine if it goes to court.
£600 is a bit on the high side, but not unreasonable for a case involving presenting someone else's photocard to purchase a ticket.

I thought it makes no difference to use other person's photocard if I am a student. I used it for convenience but not for fare evasion. Clearly I was too native and should pay for my ignorance and I accept that. But they want me to agree that I would pay for any fare that I avoided. But I did not avoid and did not try to avoid. I don't think I am a criminal.

Is there any chance to argue about that?
 

edcys

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2017
Messages
7
Another question - how did this end up being a revenue protection case? What happened after you asked for the ticket? What were you asked and what did you tell them?

What does 'a revenue protection case' mean?
 

edcys

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2017
Messages
7
Could I ask why you didn't get your own photo card? If you are a student then it would have been a simple matter. The TOC will want an answer to this question.
The settlement amount has nothing to do with your visa application, it has to do with the seriousness of the offence. It's easy to get cards mixed up and attempt to tap in/out with the wrong card (the case you're making a comparison to). Your case is, basically, fraud and so will attract a higher fine if it goes to court.
£600 is a bit on the high side, but not unreasonable for a case involving presenting someone else's photocard to purchase a ticket.

The thing that really worries me is actually the Formal Warning. I don't know if I can get a visa with it.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,395
Location
No longer here
I thought it makes no difference to use other person's photocard if I am a student. I used it for convenience but not for fare evasion. Clearly I was too native and should pay for my ignorance and I accept that. But they want me to agree that I would pay for any fare that I avoided. But I did not avoid and did not try to avoid. I don't think I am a criminal.

Is there any chance to argue about that?

Why would you think it was okay to use someone else's photo card?

Are you a student?

Do you have your own photo card?

Is your visa for the UK conditional on you being a student?
 
Last edited:

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,216
Location
Airedale
What does 'a revenue protection case' mean?

Revenue Protection is what the railways (and others) do to ensure that they receive the money they are entitled to.
You tried to pay less for your travel than you were entitled to when you did not carry a valid discount card.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,924
Location
Scotland
I thought it makes no difference to use other person's photocard...
I don't know how they could make it any clearer that it's intended for use by the named person - it's got their picture on it!
But I did not avoid and did not try to avoid. I don't think I am a criminal.

Is there any chance to argue about that?
Possibly. It depends on the answer to my other question - what exactly happened, how did you end up being questioned?
What does 'a revenue protection case' mean?
Sorry, I shouldn't have used jargon. Revenue protection is the generic term used for everything involved in preventing, detecting and prosecuting suspected fare evasion.
 

edcys

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2017
Messages
7
Why would you think it was okay to use someone else's photo card?

Are you a student?

Do you have your own photo card?

Is your visa for the UK conditional on you being a student?

I was ignorant of law. I know I deserve a punishment.

I am a student.

I apply for my card after the incident.

I will switch my visa from Tier-4 to Tier-2 recently.

I guess the best I can have is to accept the Formal Warning and pay the penalty.
 

edcys

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2017
Messages
7
I don't know how they could make it any clearer that it's intended for use by the named person - it's got their picture on it!
Possibly. It depends on the answer to my other question - what exactly happened, how did you end up being questioned?
Sorry, I shouldn't have used jargon. Revenue protection is the generic term used for everything involved in preventing, detecting and prosecuting suspected fare evasion.

I think I have to accept the Formal Warning.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,395
Location
No longer here
I was ignorant of law. I know I deserve a punishment.

I am a student.

I apply for my card after the incident.

I will switch my visa from Tier-4 to Tier-2 recently.

I guess the best I can have is to accept the Formal Warning and pay the penalty.

That is probably the most sensible thing to do.

I am not an expert on visa matters but all things considered, it is unlikely the Home Office will know of a warning issued by a TOC - and even if they did, I'd be surprised if they were legally allowed to act on it.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
13,348
A warning issued by a train operating company simply means that if you come to their attention again they are likely to prosecute. It won't impact a visa application.

If the warning is issued by the police, then it could impact a visa application but I don't think this is the case here.
 

BluePenguin

On Moderation
Joined
26 Sep 2016
Messages
1,605
Location
Kent
Being a student, I can relate. I think that it is unfair for any TOC to exploit more money out of you than the cost of the ticket. However using any ID with someone elses photo on is never a good idea - you would never use a friend's driving licence to buy a drink for example. On this basis saying that you didn't know you couldn't use your friend's card to buy cheaper tickets for yourself doesn't really wash.

On another note you are a student and can get you own photo card - which you should do. I would definitely apologise and offer to pay the difference between the discounted and undiscounted fare plus an amount of compensation which is more appropriate to your financial situation but still high enough to discourage you from doing this again.

I know this is probably not the best advice but just my opinion as a student. If it goes to court, apologise and negotiate but do not admit anything you did not do to get out more easily as it won't work. A friend of mine was slammed in court by Virgin last yesr and got away with only paying the cost of the original ticket. I wouldn't worry about your visa.

Surely it is in a TOCs interest to discourage fare evasion and ecourage the purchase nof tickets. Not make offenders fines so large that they cannot possibly afford to travel by train again - which in turn will see people re-offend.
 

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
5,125
you would never use a friend's driving licence to buy a drink for example.

Not sure how good an example this is since it's pretty commonplace, and the likely consequences of getting caught doing it are generally fairly mild. A better example might be using a friend's driving licence to drive a car...
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,545
Being a student, I can relate. I think that it is unfair for any TOC to exploit more money out of you than the cost of the ticket.

(snip)

Surely it is in a TOCs interest to discourage fare evasion and encourage the purchase of tickets. Not make offenders fines so large that they cannot possibly afford to travel by train again - which in turn will see people re-offend.
So, you think that students should be given carte blanche to evade their fares with no real penalty, whilst acknowledging that TOCs need to discourage such behaviour? Perhaps you could consider how contradictory that is, and how it might possibly work.
 

twpsaesneg

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2009
Messages
419
I thought it makes no difference to use other person's photocard if I am a student. I used it for convenience but not for fare evasion. Clearly I was too native and should pay for my ignorance and I accept that. But they want me to agree that I would pay for any fare that I avoided. But I did not avoid and did not try to avoid. I don't think I am a criminal.

Is there any chance to argue about that?

Technically, byelaw offences aside, by using someone else's photocard you have committed the offence of Fraud by false representation contrary to section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/section/2

So it could be a whole lot worse.

Unless you were dealt with by a Police Officer, you are unlikely to have had any sort of formal warning - i.e. a Police Caution - that will show up on a PNC check.

I can't understand how it would be more "convenient" to use someone else's ID card. And if you really wanted to be pedantic, your friend - if they have allowed you to use their card - has committed conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation...

Personally, if I were you, I'd pay up the money and brush up on UK law.
 

BluePenguin

On Moderation
Joined
26 Sep 2016
Messages
1,605
Location
Kent
Not sure how good an example this is since it's pretty commonplace, and the likely consequences of getting caught doing it are generally fairly mild. A better example might be using a friend's driving licence to drive a car...

Common place? How common place it happens shouldn't matter though. Your "better" example might be more relatable to some people, but driving a car illegally surely has more severe consequence. I agree with you
 

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
16,232
Location
0036
I thought it makes no difference to use other person's photocard if I am a student. I used it for convenience but not for fare evasion. Clearly I was too native and should pay for my ignorance and I accept that. But they want me to agree that I would pay for any fare that I avoided. But I did not avoid and did not try to avoid.
Yes you did.
I don't think I am a criminal.
Yes you are.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,107
Location
UK
How were you just using a photocard? I assume it was a photocard with an accompanying railcard that wasn't yours?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top