• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Where to retire to?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
103,891
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
While still have a few years to go where would be a good place to retire if I want to:

Live outside London and south-east (so can afford property)
In a reasonable sized town or suburb which has a good rail service to a nearby large city
Decent bus services to get around said town or suburb

Lancaster would probably tick all those boxes. Easy access to beautiful countryside, too. And dirt cheap housing.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
103,891
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
But I do agree with Bevan, do think hard about retiring to somewhere where you know nobody. When you are working, it is easy to ask your new colleagues questions like "where is the best place for....". Once you're retired, you're on your own.

If you're so minded, there are plenty of clubs and the likes to join.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
I will be working as a teacher until I'm 68 (I'm 31)... It's not worth thinking about ...

You do, however, have the choice of saving independently so you don't have to wait until the regular retirement age. At such a young age you have time on your side.
 

UP13

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2018
Messages
376
You do, however, have the choice of saving independently so you don't have to wait until the regular retirement age. At such a young age you have time on your side.

I suppose the teacher's pension is decent however to get the full value I think I have to work continually as a teacher until I'm 65.
 

etr221

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,341
A friend of mine (with similar criteria) chose Abergavenny - I forget what other places he had on his short list. I do know he did quite a bit of research, to ensure it had - and would continue to have - all the features and facilities he wanted, or might need, e.g. a good hospital. Other things to bear in mind is where (and hence how mutually accessible) are your family and friends; and what anywhere is like at the 'wrong' time of year.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,050
Location
Fenny Stratford
You do, however, have the choice of saving independently so you don't have to wait until the regular retirement age. At such a young age you have time on your side.

you do - However it is much easier if you are single, have a good job, have no family responsibilities, no financial responsibilities like a mortgage and no social draws on your time.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
you do - However it is much easier if you are single, have a good job, have no family responsibilities, no financial responsibilities like a mortgage and no social draws on your time.

Easier, yes. But I'm sure a lot of people who currently think that saving is impossible could save, possibly even quite substantial amounts. Having a mortgage may help with saving as you are probably paying less mortgage than rent and living with a partner can be cheaper than being on your own as living costs can be shared. You do, however, have the problem of your partner having to buy into your saving philosophy. A large part of saving is being able to do your own thing and not giving into peer pressure. Nowadays with automatic pension deductions by default a lot of people are saving without thinking or they may even be oblivious to it if they don't read their payslips.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,050
Location
Fenny Stratford
Easier, yes. But I'm sure a lot of people who currently think that saving is impossible could save, possibly even quite substantial amounts. Having a mortgage may help with saving as you are probably paying less mortgage than rent and living with a partner can be cheaper than being on your own as living costs can be shared. You do, however, have the problem of your partner having to buy into your saving philosophy. A large part of saving is being able to do your own thing and not giving into peer pressure. Nowadays with automatic pension deductions by default a lot of people are saving without thinking or they may even be oblivious to it if they don't read their payslips.

it isnt about peer pressure. It is about having enough money left at the end of the month to put away enough to make a difference. I know many people do not. Many people have too much month left at the end of their money.

Like i said: a single, lone, isolated person will be in a position to save more money more often. Someone with a couple of kids, rent etc wont easily be able to save. It is as simple as having to buy food for 4 rather than 1. It is as simple as having to pay 4 bus fares rather than one.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,050
Location
Fenny Stratford
Peer pressure can be a factor, i see it with some of my younger colleagues.

agreed - people spend money on things they don't need with money they don't have. But for many putting money away at enough of a level to be helpful in retirement isnt an option. For many it isnt about where they retire to to but more about how they will manage in retirement.

I am tight so don't spend much money on things I want. I do spend it on things I need. Not having enough money to put food on the table tends to focus the mind on what is actually important!
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Like i said: a single, lone, isolated person will be in a position to save more money more often. Someone with a couple of kids, rent etc wont easily be able to save. It is as simple as having to buy food for 4 rather than 1. It is as simple as having to pay 4 bus fares rather than one.

Surely single people without children are the worst off as they have no one to share household costs with? Plus they get no benefits other than reduced Council Tax. Couples don't have to have children. If I decided to buy a Rolls-Royce, could I then complain that I've got no money to save for a pension? Having said that, many if not most people with children still manage to save for a pension.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,050
Location
Fenny Stratford
Surely single people without children are the worst off as they have no one to share household costs with? Plus they get no benefits other than reduced Council Tax. Couples don't have to have children. If I decided to buy a Rolls-Royce, could I then complain that I've got no money to save for a pension? Having said that, many if not most people with children still manage to save for a pension.

I maintain that a single person, especially one without family responsibility will be in a better position to save for a retirement fund than someone with a family.

I know from previous threads your views on family life and reproduction so i shall leave it there as I do not wish to be drawn into them again.
 

Shimbleshanks

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2012
Messages
1,123
Location
Purley
I went to Darwen in Lancashire the other day and thought it would be an excellent place to retire to. Moorland scenery, short train journey to Manchester. Have yet to convince the Missus to up sticks from south London though...
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
I maintain that a single person, especially one without family responsibility will be in a better position to save for a retirement fund than someone with a family.

I know from previous threads your views on family life and reproduction so i shall leave it there as I do not wish to be drawn into them again.

Are you happy with the fact that people who spend their money on children may have to work much longer than those who don't have children, or should the government increase funding for families so they can retire early too?
 

UP13

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2018
Messages
376
I am far better with money than I was when I left university. However I saved up far more money back then simply because I didn't have a wife and three kids.

Yes you can share household costs with a partner but I also have to share the costs of paying for three housemates who don't contribute to rent, bills, food etc. I also have to pay for their social lives, hobbies etc.

FYI we do save money (now after many years of struggling month to month) but we place the majority of it in their savings not our own.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
If the housing is dirt cheap, there is usually a reason for that, and not a good one.

Some places are safe but cheap because there is little industry there so people are forced to move away to find work. But if you are retired that doesn't matter.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
103,891
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
If the housing is dirt cheap, there is usually a reason for that, and not a good one.

Have you actually been to Lancaster? It's a lovely little city, a bit of a mini-Edinburgh in some ways.

The main reason that part of the world is cheap is that there is relatively low employment, and most of it is relatively low-wage, while unlike the Lakes proper where those things are still true there is no holiday home demand. The same applies to the likes of Carlisle and the Cumbrian Coast.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
17,159
Location
Devon
Have you actually been to Lancaster? It's a lovely little city, a bit of a mini-Edinburgh in some ways.

The main reason that part of the world is cheap is that there is relatively low employment, and most of it is relatively low-wage, while unlike the Lakes proper where those things are still true there is no holiday home demand. The same applies to the likes of Carlisle and the Cumbrian Coast.
I visited Lancaster properly for the first time last year and was pleasantly surprised by how nice it was (it was a scorching hot day too).
Now I may live in Devon but I’m no stranger to the north. I’ve visited plenty of areas all over the country which have been beautiful/interesting/friendly etc, and half my family are from Nottingham which is also very different to where I live.

But I don’t think anyone has mentioned the South West yet, which is interesting.
I wonder whether this is because house prices are perceived to have crept up quite a lot over the last twenty years?
There are actually still some quite cheap places to live down here (especially certain more rural areas and bits of north Devon etc).
Quite a few of my customers are people that have moved down here from various parts of the country (and not just the South East) to retire and enjoy a ‘quieter’ life.

Of course they may just be happy and content because they’ve found such an easy to deal with tradesman who makes sure that they get a quality job and decent value for money. :lol:
But I don’t think it’s just that.

Not sure if I mentioned it but we’ve got palm trees..?

I really liked what someone said upthread (I’ll check who once I’ve posted this *) about having your friends and family nearby... In actual fact this is what makes somewhere feel like home. Spot on...

*It was Bevan
 
Last edited:

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
20,534
Location
Airedale
My wife and I have just taken early retirement at 66 which involved moving house and location (we are clergy).
Most of our criteria have already been mentioned - buses, shops, family and friends, but I would add: think to the future: will you still be able to live there in 15-20 years time? The hills will only get steeper :)
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
I went to Darwen in Lancashire the other day and thought it would be an excellent place to retire to. Moorland scenery, short train journey to Manchester. Have yet to convince the Missus to up sticks from south London though...
But according to a recent report the borough which contains Darwen is among the five worst places to live in the north of England! As I refused to accept the 'cookies' the Lancashire newspaper which reported this wished to place on my browser, I wasn't allowed to peruse any further than the headline, but I'm sure the report is out there somewhere.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,103
full of students though.
That's a plus, it keeps a town vibrant and busy. And a local might be able to take one in for a bit if extra dosh! Meanwhile I've been sniffing around property sales in Gibraltar and there are small studios and one beddys available for £150k with no residents permit issues cos we is British innit, gets over Brexit issues and probably health provisions, although I think some insurance is required.
 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,539
Surely single people without children are the worst off as they have no one to share household costs with? Plus they get no benefits other than reduced Council Tax. Couples don't have to have children. If I decided to buy a Rolls-Royce, could I then complain that I've got no money to save for a pension? Having said that, many if not most people with children still manage to save for a pension.

The reduced council tax isn't a benefit. Council tax is based on two adults living in a property, so a couple paying £1000 in council tax is paying less per person than a single person paying £750, i.e. the single homeowner pays more.

Couples don't have to have children, but if only couples who could easily afford bringing up a child without any issue of putting money aside for retirement and paying for all the other things that go with living, few people would have children, which would ultimately bring national problems of its own. We would then have to have immigrants to fill the workplaces and pay taxes to fund the social services which support the large bulge of elderly people which on a population scale have high healthcare costs. Still, that won't be a problem, the UK population loves immigrants, doesn't it.
 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,539
go somewhere hot. not having to heat your home through a hard winter is a massive saving.

You will probably find that climates with winters mild enough to not require central heating tend to have summers which are hot enough to require air conditioning, so you gain in one season, and lose in the opposite season.
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,379
Location
Liverpool
Look no further than the East Midlands, Market Harborough is nice, and you're on the MML with services to London, Leicester & Nottingham!
Ah mate from where. We had family friends in Market Harborough and visited a lot but where the hell would you retire from? It's like suggesting retiring to Widnes, Warrington or Runcorn.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
That's a plus, it keeps a town vibrant and busy. And a local might be able to take one in for a bit if extra dosh! Meanwhile I've been sniffing around property sales in Gibraltar and there are small studios and one beddys available for £150k with no residents permit issues cos we is British innit, gets over Brexit issues and probably health provisions, although I think some insurance is required.
I was watching a tv news item on Gibraltar a month or two back and lots of the younger residents who've been there all their lives are planning on moving out because they foresee such trouble in getting off the Rock in future years, almost regardless of how Brexit goes. Spain's P.M. may have been warned off recently by the European Commission in order not to mess up the 'deal' with the U.K., but once the U.K. leaves the E.U. the gloves will be off!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top