Fisherman80
Member
- Joined
- 29 Apr 2018
- Messages
- 219
Ever seen "Dunkirk"? It was great until the soldiers at the end were in a Mk1 carriage.......refurbished too!
I remember watching The Interview film with Seth Rogen in it, in the train scene it shows them on a Diesel engine hauled sleeper service, but an “external shot” shows a Swiss regional electric train!
Back to The Darkest Hour
Winston Churchill gets on at
St James's Park going to Westminster.
Walking through the subway we clearly see a brown band for Bakerloo Line.
This station is not on the Bakerloo Line!
The scene of the journey on the train
uses 5mins of time to complete,whereas the actual real journey time is around 2mins.
Also,and you have to have a sharp eye for this one....when he gets off,he gets off at
St James's Park!!!!!
The LU rounded although fuzzed out of focus shows a 3 part station name upon opening of the train doors.
I love this film even with its inaccuracies.
But makes me wonder how much better it could have been if producers did their homework properly for the authenticity value rather than lazy filming.
I suppose most of the time its
make do with whatever they can get
to get it as close as?
Incidently, the scene with Churchill meeting the French President at the
airport in May 1940 has a C47 plane
in the background which entered service
in 1941.
Piccadilly to Stockport?I'm still waiting for the North West morning travel news to stop showing four-rail electrified track when there are train delays.
My poor phrasing - four-rail in the London Underground sense.Piccadilly to Stockport?
The university I work at was used as the location for the Black Mirror episode 'The National Anthem' (the one with the pig...). Our various buildings and facilities doubled as a hospital (bits of corridor and a landing), a TV news control room (a recording studio), a news desk (computers in the library although I think they cut that scene), and various other random locations along the way,
That'd be four track, not four rail.Piccadilly to Stockport?
I've noticed a few TV ads recently where they've obviously used a preserved railway as the rolling stock is decidedly heritage in looks. There was a recent Vodafone ad, and another one for a payday loans company. The payday loans ad showed the station too, which definitely looked like a preserved station.
If it's the ad I'm thinking of, then it certainly was; also starring the GCRs' green class 101 DMU.If I'm not mistaken, the payday loans ad was filmed at Loughborough Central station.
I'm not sure about that... Some clearly care, but still make mistakes.
Of course, some make very silly mistakes that even the average UK resident is likely to notice; the James Bond film "Skyfall", for example uses "tube" trains for a sequence that's supposed to be on the District line... And the lights remain on after the train is derailed; any regular tube user knows that the lights often go off in normal service when the train passes a "gap" in the live rails.
What's that supposed to mean? Is it supposed to be an insult or a lazy attempt to dismiss my point?
I simply posted my own observations, showing that much of the time filmmakers do do substantial research to make settings accurate and that often inaccuracies are more "mistakes" than "we don't care". The rest of the time when they truly "don't care" (as in the "Skyfall" example), it's often on the level of "it breaks the immersion for the majority of people familiar with the setting" rather than the "wrong sound effect" that only a serious rail enthusiast would notice.
Is it really wrong to want historical/setting accuracy in movies and TV? Do you not think that aids in immersion and appreciation of media? Or are you happy of the thinly-veiled propaganda that features in so-called "historical" films by the likes of Mel Gibson?
The only bit about Skyfall which annoyed me was when Bond split the train with the digger, and the broken brake pipe didn't stop the train.
But if they were going to use a Jubilee line train, then why not set that scene on the Jubilee line rather than the District ?
Yes it was supposed to be Bristol but they did film well outside the city on railways such as the Nene Valley and North Yorkshire Moors.My poor phrasing - four-rail in the London Underground sense.
I was a student in Bristol in the early years of Casualty (a long running popular television drama then made in Bristol m'Lud) and being location finder for Casualty must have been a serious contender for an 'easiest job in the world' award. So when they had an episode with the victim of the week being a student, the hall of residence scenes were filmed at a hall of residence, and the students union scenes at the students union.
That sounds like they were covering over the advertising posters, and rather than making dummy adverts with fake brands to use while filming, they asked the station to swap out the ads with something non-commercial that they had around.I also recently saw an episode of The Two Ronnies which had a sketch set on a railway platform, but had some oddly replaced posters for new rules on Multi-aspect signals, and something else. They looked like something I'd expect to see in a BR staffroom, not on the platform..
If I'm not mistaken, the payday loans ad was filmed at Loughborough Central station.
That sounds like they were covering over the advertising posters, and rather than making dummy adverts with fake brands to use while filming, they asked the station to swap out the ads with something non-commercial that they had around.
Ever seen "Dunkirk"? It was great until the soldiers at the end were in a Mk1 carriage.......refurbished too!
Yes ....I went with a friend who is in no way a train spotter. She couldn't tell a Mark 1 coach from .......well a mark 2 or a Gresley teak I don't suppose. However - when the soldiers got in to the train she was pulled right out of the story by the sight of formica panelling and a 60s style moquette. It was just obviously not 1940s decor. So the use of incorrect rolling stock in this case didn't just cause a problem for the train spotter. A bit of wood panelling and all would have been well I suspect - I thought that was poorly observed by the film makers.
SWMBO will always pick out anachronisms in furnishings, clothes, hairstyles or make up. I pick up trains, buses and occasionally street furniture. We both wince at the ones (The Eagle Has Landed and the Father Brown TV series) which use medieval parish churches as modern Catholic churches, has nobody heard of Henry VIII?Yes ....I went with a friend who is in no way a train spotter. She couldn't tell a Mark 1 coach from .......well a mark 2 or a Gresley teak I don't suppose. However - when the soldiers got in to the train she was pulled right out of the story by the sight of formica panelling and a 60s style moquette. It was just obviously not 1940s decor. So the use of incorrect rolling stock in this case didn't just cause a problem for the train spotter. A bit of wood panelling and all would have been well I suspect - I thought that was poorly observed by the film makers.
Where the drivers/guards announcement is made through the platforms PA or someone in an office in the station or control makes it. Either way, pretty unrealistic.Not really a film but 456013 was used in a Colgate Total Advert recently
No, it's just ignoring several scientific laws.That happened in Paddington 2 as well. I mean, for goodness sake, I was so angry. It's absolutely ridiculous that, in a good, old-fashioned bit of escapist cinema fun like Bond or Paddington, the film-makers should be so ignorant as to ignore the laws of train braking!