• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

An alternative route between Plymouth and Exeter, via Okehampton, should be built

Status
Not open for further replies.

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,241
Location
Yorks
Moderator note: Split from

What happened to that second route to Plymouth David Cameron was talking about. Have they built it yet ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,241
Location
Yorks
Yet the usual suspects will be arguing that there's no need for an additional route to Plymouth.
 

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,869
Location
Southport
Yet the usual suspects will be arguing that there's no need for an additional route to Plymouth.
For the sake of resiliency, it’s completely unacceptable for there to only be a single operational route to Plymouth, so whenever there are any issues with it the whole of Cornwall gets cut off. The L&SWR line via Okehampton is the perfect candidate for a diversionary route and this incident isn’t even anything to do with the Dawlish sea wall.
 

Martin_1981

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2011
Messages
259
For the sake of resiliency, it’s completely unacceptable for there to only be a single operational route to Plymouth, so whenever there are any issues with it the whole of Cornwall gets cut off. The L&SWR line via Okehampton is the perfect candidate for a diversionary route and this incident isn’t even anything to do with the Dawlish sea wall.
The Okehampton route would be a godsend at times like this if it was ever to be reopened in full. I think it's a must.
 

24Grange

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2021
Messages
237
Location
Baldock
DfT are not going to reinstate Bere Alston- Okehampton for a contingency of the "main line" being shut for say 2 weeks a year ( couple of bridge strikes and a Dawlish cliff fall/washout). The price NR would charge of xxxxxx Billions would make it not cost effective. Cheaper to do rail replacement buses and taxis like I ( and many others) had to endure in 2014!! Each time it happens.

Every train stops at Plymouth and Exeter anyway, so turnaround times would not be as much as people think - not that its going to happen.

Mind you if Devon was in Scotland, it probably have been replaced by now!
 

Rich McLean

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2012
Messages
1,685
Plymouth - Exeter via Tavistock would have to stack up in its own right. If the Okehampton branch does well, and they re-open Bere Alston - Tavistock and that does well as an hourly service, then there maybe a good case to plug the gap. As it is, the bus route between Okehampton and Tavistock does a poor trade and is a Devon County Council funded route.

Also you have to remember that the car is king in rural Devon, which will go against it, unless they build park and ride car parks at strategic locations.

As for Johnny Mercer, it looks as if he may go independent shortly. He wouldn't gain enough MPs to support a leadership bid as too many Tory MPs can't stand him.
 

Martin_1981

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2011
Messages
259
Plymouth - Exeter via Tavistock would have to stack up in its own right. If the Okehampton branch does well, and they re-open Bere Alston - Tavistock and that does well as an hourly service, then there maybe a good case to plug the gap. As it is, the bus route between Okehampton and Tavistock does a poor trade and is a Devon County Council funded route.

Also you have to remember that the car is king in rural Devon, which will go against it, unless they build park and ride car parks at strategic locations.

As for Johnny Mercer, it looks as if he may go independent shortly. He wouldn't gain enough MPs to support a leadership bid as too many Tory MPs can't stand him.
The main route from Plymouth to Exeter will always be the route via Dawlish, even if Plymouth to Exeter via Okehampton was ever to be restored in it's entirety. I'm sure Okehampton will do well and also Tavistock if it was to be reopened, but Plymouth to Exeter as a through route via Okehampton would be an extremely useful diversionary route at times when the existing route is closed. It would probably be a bit slow and would take longer than the Dawlish route especially with reversals at both Plymouth and Exeter for any diverted through train between Penzance/Plymouth and stations north of Exeter. Probably need to add up to an hour on for the diversion.
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,234
The main route from Plymouth to Exeter will always be the route via Dawlish, even if Plymouth to Exeter via Okehampton was ever to be restored in it's entirety. I'm sure Okehampton will do well and also Tavistock if it was to be reopened, but Plymouth to Exeter as a through route via Okehampton would be an extremely useful diversionary route at times when the existing route is closed. It would probably be a bit slow and would take longer than the Dawlish route especially with reversals at both Plymouth and Exeter for any diverted through train between Penzance/Plymouth and stations north of Exeter. Probably need to add up to an hour on for the diversion.
I'm imagining this thread in an alternative reality where the Okehampton route was open, and all of the criticism that would be happening because services were still bustituted from Tiverton to Plymouth because the drivers didn't have route knowledge / there wasn't capacity for the reversals / too many single line sections / too slow journey time etc. just like the complaints when the WCML isn't diverted via the Settle & Carlisle.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,241
Location
Yorks
I'm imagining this thread in an alternative reality where the Okehampton route was open, and all of the criticism that would be happening because services were still bustituted from Tiverton to Plymouth because the drivers didn't have route knowledge / there wasn't capacity for the reversals / too many single line sections / too slow journey time etc. just like the complaints when the WCML isn't diverted via the Settle & Carlisle.

That may be true to an extent, but even if GWR didn't have the route knowledge of the Okehampton route, passengers would have the option of catching the scheduled service along the route.

For an individual passenger at Preston, it would be more of a rigmarole to get to the S&C.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
4,024
Location
Hope Valley
Politicians go to a place and promise this and that but go away and forget all about it.
Most of the quotes at the time seemed to be about things like “taking a long hard look” at resilience options. Network Rail did that, concluded that re-opening via Okehampton was poor value for money and that ‘hardening’ the Dawlish route was the best option (now well in hand thanks to taxpayer funding). Sounds like good follow through to me.

Am I missing something?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,241
Location
Yorks
Most of the quotes at the time seemed to be about things like “taking a long hard look” at resilience options. Network Rail did that, concluded that re-opening via Okehampton was poor value for money and that ‘hardening’ the Dawlish route was the best option (now well in hand thanks to taxpayer funding). Sounds like good follow through to me.

Am I missing something?

"Follow through" being a good euphemism for the litany of excuses resulting in the South West being forever destined to be at the end of a long and winding single route.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,127
Doesn't that apply to a shed load of locations? North Wales, west of Bridgend, west of Shrewsbury etc etc...
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,241
Location
Yorks
Of course they are. Plymouth is twice the population of Exeter but Plymouth is just a little to far for them and is the wrong side of Haldon Hill - the ultimate barrier of investment.

The irony being that the Tavistock route nicely avoid Haldon Hill anyway.
 
Joined
18 Aug 2018
Messages
704
The irony being that the Tavistock route nicely avoid Haldon Hill anyway.
Very true, it did indeed. The proposed inland route that NR was talking about a few years would have required tunneling under Haldon which would have been a huge job.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,851
I don't think a single route to Cornwall would be a serious problem if it was a decently maintained route....
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,241
Location
Yorks
I don't think a single route to Cornwall would be a serious problem if it was a decently maintained route....

On the contrary, there's not a single route in the kingdom that doesn't experience engineering works, unexpected disruption, weather related shutdowns. With the exception to the section around Dawlish, theres nothing particularly unusual about the main line through Newton. It's just that a large strategic area such as the West of England requires more than one railway route.
 

Glenn1969

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2019
Messages
1,983
Location
Halifax, Yorks
On the contrary, there's not a single route in the kingdom that doesn't experience engineering works, unexpected disruption, weather related shutdowns. With the exception to the section around Dawlish, theres nothing particularly unusual about the main line through Newton. It's just that a large strategic area such as the West of England requires more than one railway route.
But it has 2 as far as Exeter
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,851
On the contrary, there's not a single route in the kingdom that doesn't experience engineering works, unexpected disruption, weather related shutdowns. With the exception to the section around Dawlish, theres nothing particularly unusual about the main line through Newton. It's just that a large strategic area such as the West of England requires more than one railway route.

Given that the route via Tavistock is so slow that a coach could beat it, I would argue the A30/A38 are the second route.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,241
Location
Yorks
Given that the route via Tavistock is so slow that a coach could beat it, I would argue the A30/A38 are the second route.

Oh please.

The slow speeds to which you refer we undoubtedly the speed of a 1960's route that was being run down for closure, and if the A30/38 is "the secondary route" by that logic, a big chunk of the network is supposedly obsolete (it isn't).
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,851
Oh please.

The slow speeds to which you refer we undoubtedly the speed of a 1960's route that was being run down for closure, and if the A30/38 is "the secondary route" by that logic, a big chunk of the network is supposedly obsolete (it isn't).
How many other components of the network justify their existance (almost) solely as a reserve route for another part of the network?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,241
Location
Yorks
How many other components of the network justify their existance (almost) solely as a reserve route for another part of the network?

But the Okehampton route eouldn't justify its existance solely as a reserve route for another part of the network. It would justify its existence as being a regional route for Okehampton and Tavistock primarily.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,851
But the Okehampton route eouldn't justify its existance solely as a reserve route for another part of the network. It would justify its existence as being a regional route for Okehampton and Tavistock primarily.
A route designed for the real transport requirements of Okehampton and Tavistock would be almost useless for diversionary purposes, except as a feel good measure.

I'm not even sure it would have the Okehampton-Tavistock section in it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top