• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Transpennine Route Upgrade and Electrification updates

Codville

Member
Joined
25 Jan 2013
Messages
59
The first runs of fizzy knitting are up near Colton Junction.

Piling being done in the collyhurst area, is that the bit between victoria and miles platting junction?
The first picture looks like its somewhere around here.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

SouthEastBuses

On Moderation
Joined
15 Nov 2019
Messages
1,800
Location
uk
The former "Rose Lane" page on Network Rail's main website has been renamed "Church Fenton Level Crossing Reduction", and the TWAO docs are now visible on the link above.

Earth Wire has started to be run on route W1...


Noticed that W1 is surprisingly being electrified with Bonomi Omnia, I would have thought the whole Transpennine Line would have been Siemens Sicat. Maybe that's just Church Fenton to York Colton Junction.
 

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
1,713
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
Noticed that W1 is surprisingly being electrified with Bonomi Omnia, I would have thought the whole Transpennine Line would have been Siemens Sicat. Maybe that's just Church Fenton to York Colton Junction.
I seem to remember it being mentioned up thread that it was Bonomi up to (or including) Standedge Tunnel, with Siemens electrification being used on the rest of the program.

Please correct me if I’m wrong.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,498
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
I seem to remember it being mentioned up thread that it was Bonomi up to (or including) Standedge Tunnel, with Siemens electrification being used on the rest of the program.

Please correct me if I’m wrong.
Correct; NR's North West Route (NW&C Region) asset management team has opted for Bonomi, while the North & East Route (Eastern Region) opted for SICAT due to its similarity to Mk3 equipment.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,746
Location
Leeds
Press release


A bridge to the future in Huddersfield​

Huddersfield has moved one step closer to welcoming cleaner, greener and more efficient electric trains this week, as a new, improved bridge was installed near Deighton railway station.

The 172-year-old footbridge on Fieldhouse Lane was replaced with a thinner and taller bridge, giving Transpennine Route Upgrade engineers the space needed to eventually install overhead electric wires. This will make it possible for electric trains to run through the area in future generations, bringing a cleaner, quieter railway for residents and passengers.

Rail passengers were able to keep their journeys on track, diverting via Brighouse and the Calder Valley line. An increased number of services along this line was made possible thanks to resilience work having been undertaken over the past two years, reinforcing the route's durability in the face of increased passenger numbers and the frequent heavy downpours that hit the region.

Around 150 rail engineers worked around the clock - totalling 4,700 hours - to deliver this essential upgrade over two weekends (6-7 and 13-14 August). Despite this, road users were unaffected and pedestrians can now cross the bridge above the railway by foot once more.

Hannah Lomas, Principal Programme Sponsor for Network Rail, said: “Completely replacing Fieldhouse Lane bridge is a relatively small but important achievement for the Transpennine Route Upgrade. It takes us a step closer towards our future of faster, more frequent, more reliable rail travel on the Transpennine Main Line.

"We’re very pleased that passengers could continue to travel mostly by train over the weekends along the Calder Valley route. This was made possible through years of important resilience-boosting work to run more trains, reliably.

"As the Transport and Works Act Order has been approved, there’ll be many more major upgrades to come in this area.”

The successful Fieldhouse Lane bridge replacement is one key project in major plans to bring faster, more frequent, greener trains to the Transpennine Main Line. The Transpennine Route Upgrade will see significant improvements completed across the entirety of the Manchester to York line in the coming years.

Crucially, the new Fieldhouse Lane bridge opens up this section of the game-changing Transpennine Route Upgrade to allow the laying of more rail tracks, doubling the number of lines from two to four between Huddersfield and Westtown (Dewsbury). Once completed, this increase will make it possible for faster trains and greater capacity along the entire route.

Chris Nutton, Major Projects Director for TransPennine Express said: “The work carried out to completely replace Fieldhouse Lange bridge was another key milestone in the Transpennine Route Upgrade; delivering a railway fit for the 21st Century.

"I would like to thank customers for their cooperation whilst the important work took place.”

Due to restricted access on the site, the existing bridge was dismantled piece by piece, each weighing up to 16 tonnes, using a rail crane. A rail crane was used once more to install the new 3.5-metre-wide footbridge after it was transported from Greater Manchester to near Deighton railway station. It then made its final leg of the journey to Fieldhouse Lane before being lifted into place.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,498
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Adding this here too as, while it's not directly related to TRU, it will be sectioning the OLE when it does go live.

REAL Power Supply Upgrade said:
We’re excited to share another project update on the East Coast Mainline Power Supply Upgrade.

Over the weekend, at our Colton Junction site we successfully delivered the track sectioning cabin (TSC), also known as a Green Building, with the support of RJC Lowloaders Ltd. This is the first installation of this type of building on the northern section of the project and is a key aspect of our sites when upgrading power supply and extending the range of feeder stations. The team have worked closely with the landowner to ensure that his crop harvest was not disrupted during the works.


#Alliancing #Collaboration #Railinfrastructure #ECMLUpgrade #electrification Peter Mullett Network Rail Siemens VolkerRail Ltd J. Murphy & Sons Limited Jacobs SYSTRA
No alternative text description for this image

No alternative text description for this image

No alternative text description for this image

No alternative text description for this image

No alternative text description for this image
 

323 Class

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2019
Messages
238
Location
Hadfield, Glossop,Highpeak, Derbyshire
Had a quick visit to Stalybridge Station yesterday and noticed a lot of short metal posts with red and white tape on, also there are 4 rusty circular bases between platforms 3 and 4. Any ideas for what purpose?
 

Attachments

  • 20220817_182115.jpg
    20220817_182115.jpg
    874.7 KB · Views: 121
  • 20220817_182249.jpg
    20220817_182249.jpg
    676.2 KB · Views: 123

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
1,713
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
Had a quick visit to Stalybridge Station yesterday and noticed a lot of short metal posts with red and white tape on, also there are 4 rusty circular bases between platforms 3 and 4. Any ideas for what purpose?
The rusty circular base is what the steel structure holding up the OHLE will be attached to. I don’t know what the taped metal posts are for.
 

323 Class

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2019
Messages
238
Location
Hadfield, Glossop,Highpeak, Derbyshire
The rusty circular base is what the steel structure holding up the OHLE will be attached to. I don’t know what the taped metal posts are for.
Thanks.
The bases were only evident between the platforms, so I assume a very wide span will be used to the West with different piles / bases.
Forgot to mention that they've cut a channel from the Eastern end of platform 4 to the buffers at platform 5. Its all covered with plastic covers for the full length.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,220
The taped metal posts are for signalling "disconnection boxes". As I'm not a signal engineer, their purpose eludes me!
Its so that the cabling from (say) the signal itself to the relevant equipment room isn’t one run of cable, and can be disconnected without having to go to the signal itself. Helps with the identification and repair of faults and also quick signal disconnection without having to go on to the track itself.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,746
Location
Leeds
The cost of TRU is the main headline on the front cover of the September Modern Railways and the first item in Roger Ford's column. Haven't read it yet.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,706
Location
Mold, Clwyd
The cost of TRU is the main headline on the front cover of the September Modern Railways and the first item in Roger Ford's column. Haven't read it yet.
He quotes DfT figures that the cost will be £9-11.5 billion and be much more expensive per mile than even the GW/NW schemes.
But he can't make the figures add up, which suggests the £9 billion contains something beyond what we know as TRU.
Signalling costs are a big unknown - there's something called "enhanced conventional signalling" prior to ETCS rollout.
 

SuperNova

Member
Joined
12 Dec 2019
Messages
960
Location
The North
He quotes DfT figures that the cost will be £9-11.5 billion and be much more expensive per mile than even the GW/NW schemes.
But he can't make the figures add up, which suggests the £9 billion contains something beyond what we know as TRU.
Signalling costs are a big unknown - there's something called "enhanced conventional signalling" prior to ETCS rollout.
TRU is no longer TRU as it was. It's the first phase of NPR, hence the extra cost.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,706
Location
Mold, Clwyd
TRU is no longer TRU as it was. It's the first phase of NPR, hence the extra cost.
The old TRU had a budget of £2.9 billion, presumably for Manchester-Stalybridge, Huddersfield-Dewsbury (the main spend) and Church Fenton-York.
Now we have full electrification and resignalling, and maybe some extra trackage.
Roger's point is if that costs the extra £6 billion, it's a ferociously expensive project.
If it includes an element of NPR west of Marsden, that would be a different story.
 

CdBrux

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2014
Messages
772
Location
Munich
The old TRU had a budget of £2.9 billion, presumably for Manchester-Stalybridge, Huddersfield-Dewsbury (the main spend) and Church Fenton-York.
Now we have full electrification and resignalling, and maybe some extra trackage.
Roger's point is if that costs the extra £6 billion, it's a ferociously expensive project.
If it includes an element of NPR west of Marsden, that would be a different story.
At the risk of being too speculative I suspect it's a far easier 'sell' to include money and works in TRU vs NPR - and can be approved and delivered far quicker. It may allow the benefits of a Manchester to Marsden tunnel not to be constrained (as much) by the network from Marsden to Leeds and possibly beyond.
 

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
1,713
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
I have seen full electrification confirmed multiple times.
Let’s see if the Transport Secretary that Liz or Rishi appoint will have the appetite for repeatedly renouncing projects such as TRU that Grant Schnapps has.

One thing about TRU interfacing with NPR is that it creates the dilemma of how the existing and proposed stations between Huddersfield and Stalybridge will be served.

For one, based off of a plan of Huddersfield’s station layout in the future, what platform will stopping services from Manchester use? Will they use platform three to terminate, with Leeds bound expresses using platform 4 and Manchester bound expresses using platform 2? Or will they use platforms 4 and 5 to terminate or carry on using the slow lines, thus creating a conflict between Manchester bound stopping services leaving platform 4 and Leeds bound expresses arriving into platform 3?
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
1,896
Location
Leeds
For one, based off of a plan of Huddersfield’s station layout in the future, what platform will stopping services from Manchester use? Will they use platform three to terminate, with Leeds bound expresses using platform 4 and Manchester bound expresses using platform 2? Or will they use platforms 4 and 5 to terminate or carry on using the slow lines, thus creating a conflict between Manchester bound stopping services leaving platform 4 and Leeds bound expresses arriving into platform 3?
I think it's the other way around. New platforms 2 and 3 (current platforms 1 and 4) are the 'straighter' ones.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,684
Location
Another planet...
I think it's the other way around. New platforms 2 and 3 (current platforms 1 and 4) are the 'straighter' ones.
Yes- the slow lines will be furthest from the main entrance using platforms 4 (currently 8) and 5 (newly constructed). Not sure what the plan is regarding the conflicting moves highlighted by @Halish Railway , but as everything will stop at Huddersfield anyway (so speeds will be lower) a relatively simple crossing move twice an hour shouldn't be too much of a problem.
 

Top