• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

HS2 construction updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,491
User staffie on SSC has posted a picture of works at Huddlesford, east of Lichfield, where HS2, a few miles before the north end of Phase 1, will go under the WCML. The picture appears to show the reinforced concrete floor slab of a future box-type bridge, which the WCML will presumably be diverted to go over once the bridge is structurally complete. The user remarks that the original plan was to go over the WCML here.

Does anyone have a link to a map showing the required WCML realignment?


Edit: on second thoughts maybe I've misunderstood the bridge type. Maybe it will be pipejacked like the Werrington underpass or something?
Here is a drawing from 2016:
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,030
User staffie on SSC has posted a picture of works at Huddlesford, east of Lichfield, where HS2, a few miles before the north end of Phase 1, will go under the WCML. The picture appears to show the reinforced concrete floor slab of a future box-type bridge, which the WCML will presumably be diverted to go over once the bridge is structurally complete. The user remarks that the original plan was to go over the WCML here.

Does anyone have a link to a map showing the required WCML realignment?


Edit: on second thoughts maybe I've misunderstood the bridge type. Maybe it will be pipejacked like the Werrington underpass or something?
Not pipe jack per se. Dig down and slid in and back fill on top I believe. The OLE has been moved already.
 
Joined
18 Oct 2017
Messages
215
A more "up to date" (circa 2021) Schedule 17 planning application for the WCML bridge can be found on Lichfield District Councils planning portal (application reference 21/01249/HST) ...


As noted by others, the WCML is not being realigned - the bridge is being constructed off-line and will be jacked into place when ready. Presumably that's cheaper (less land and material etc required than diverting the WCML,) requires a shorter closure of the WCML and means no alignment changes on the WCML (one wonders whether such could impact WMCL signalling, timetable, speeds profile, etc.. if they'd gone that way? Over to the experts...)

(I use the term "jacked" in the loosest sense - whether it will be "shoved" by jacks a la Werrington or lifted on some modular transporters a la the Cow Lane Bridge in the Reading remodelling, I do not know.)
 
Last edited:

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,491
A more "up to date" (circa 2021) Schedule 17 planning application for the WCML bridge can be found on Lichfield District Councils planning portal (application reference 21/01249/HST) ...


As noted by others, the WCML is not being realigned - the bridge is being constructed off-line and will be jacked into place when ready. Presumably that's cheaper (less land and material etc required than diverting the WCML,) requires a shorter closure of the WCML and means no alignment changes on the WCML (one wonders whether such could impact WMCL signalling, timetable, speeds profile, etc.. if they'd gone that way? Over to the experts...)

(I use the term "jacked" in the loosest sense - whether it will be "shoved" by jacks a la Werrington or lifted on some modular transporters a la the Cow Lane Bridge in the Reading remodelling, I do not know.)
I expect it will become clearer if at some point the concrete box construction gets a shaped cutting edge. If it doesn’t it’s probably not going to be full scale jacking, just transporting into a gap dug in the existing formation. As per your Reading example that can be likely done in a few days, for example over an extended Christmas closure.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,737
Location
Mold, Clwyd
I expect it will become clearer if at some point the concrete box construction gets a shaped cutting edge. If it doesn’t it’s probably not going to be full scale jacking, just transporting into a gap dug in the existing formation. As per your Reading example that can be likely done in a few days, for example over an extended Christmas closure.
Even better if it coincides with the inevitable Trent Valley closures to tie in the flying HS2 junction at Handsacre...
There's also the HS2 structure under (?) the Lichfield-Alrewas/A38 route to consider, but that is separate from the WCML.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,030
Even better if it coincides with the inevitable Trent Valley closures to tie in the flying HS2 junction at Handsacre...
There's also the HS2 structure under (?) the Lichfield-Alrewas/A38 route to consider, but that is separate from the WCML.
The bridge will be way before Handsacre as they need it as a haul route to get material for the Handsacre embankments.

As an aside, the EW deck went in at Calvert last week apparently.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,761
Location
Leeds
There's also the HS2 structure under (?) the Lichfield-Alrewas/A38 route to consider, but that is separate from the WCML.
Indeed, according to the map in #1652, HS2 goes in quick succession under the Lichfield-Burton line, the A38 southbound exit slip road for Lichfield, and the A38 mainline.
 

stuving

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2017
Messages
275
The link to Lichfield Planning (above) leads to a document set that includes some explanations of the construction process. The last document (1mc09-bbv-tp-app-ns06_nl16-000001 combined.pdf) combines all the submissions, and includes this as well as plans:
4 Design Approach and Rationale
4.1.1 The design of the West Coast Mainline Overbridge as a jacked box has been developed since final preliminary design stage as it is the only construction method that causes
minimal disruption to the West Coast Mainline. The short blockade that will be used to
install the structure means that the West Coast Mainline in the area is only closed for a
short period, and the structure can be constructed offline well away from the operational
railway leading up to the blockade and installation. The wing walls were added due to the
removal of Streethay Retaining Structure and are required to keep the Streethay Cutting
earthworks within the Limits of Deviation boundary after installation, as well as to retain
the existing Network Rail embankment.
4.1.2 This design presents an opportunity to attach part of the wing walls to the base slab of
the jacked box, and jack in the box and all but 10-15m of the wing walls on the north and
south sides. This avoids the need to pile close to an operational rail boundary and
reduces the number of secant piles required for the structure.
4.2 Design Constraints
4.2.1 The wing walls added to the structure were due to the LOD constraints on the structure
and the new, wider earthworks from Streethay Open Cut (post removal of Streethay
Retaining Structure from the area). The wing walls are required to ensure that the cutting
earthworks remain within the LOD boundary.
I'm struggling to understand quite what that wing wall attaches to and rests on, but you get the general idea.
 
Joined
18 Oct 2017
Messages
215
The sequencing of the works to get under the A38 is an aspect I find the more interesting of the three crossings. I hail from that area and am old enough to remember when the A38 between Hilliards Cross and Streethay was not yet a dual carriageway, let alone the A38 being a bypass to the East of Lichfield - we used to have to travel through the City itself. It's decades since I lived there, but I don't doubt the A38 has become no less busy since and will need to be kept open to traffic as much as possible. I see the "off" (southbound) slip at Streethay has already been closed for works and the central reservation on the main carriageway removed so they can "play" with the traffic lanes a bit.

As yet, I haven't found anything in the public realm that describes the details of how they going to sequence the work. If anyone knows...
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,169
Location
Surrey
Wow that is an excellent video which shows the true scale of the construction work taking place. Clearly visible defined route now from the air which is amazing.

At Calvert are they letting HS2 get on with the work before EWR because they are projecting Oxford to MK/Bedford to be open by 2025 I thought.
Huge land take in places for a two track railway though. There also appears to be a new roadway all the way not just a dirt track that they used on motorways in the 80's!
 

ABB125

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2016
Messages
3,771
Location
University of Birmingham
Huge land take in places for a two track railway though. There also appears to be a new roadway all the way not just a dirt track that they used on motorways in the 80's!
3m wide access strip either side or most of the route, outside the line's security fencing (which is essentially prison fencing!). Whether the strip is grassed or paved depends on how frequently it will need to be used, and whether it provides access to "a thing" (eg: autotransformer site).
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,169
Location
Surrey
3m wide access strip either side or most of the route, outside the line's security fencing (which is essentially prison fencing!). Whether the strip is grassed or paved depends on how frequently it will need to be used, and whether it provides access to "a thing" (eg: autotransformer site).
Fair dos after construction just seems in many places they've got football fields of space but in certain areas but im sure from an environmental perspective they were required demonstrate minimum use of land.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,229
Fair dos after construction just seems in many places they've got football fields of space but in certain areas but im sure from an environmental perspective they were required demonstrate minimum use of land.

it‘s all on the land plans on their website why they need temporary land.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,901
I'm struggling to understand quite what that wing wall attaches to and rests on, but you get the general idea.
I think from reading the section quoted, that the outer ends of the wingwalls are the secant pile with capping beam lengths visible in the photo linked from post 1651. The inner ends of the wingwalls will be cast on the base slab and be connected to the side walls of the box, and will be slid into place with the box. Presumably an insitu concrete stitch section will then link the two parts of each wingwall together.
(Secant piles are cylindrical concrete bored piles spaced at less than their diameter, so that they cut slightly into each other and interlock).
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,285
Location
St Albans
Fair dos after construction just seems in many places they've got football fields of space but in certain areas but im sure from an environmental perspective they were required demonstrate minimum use of land.
Much of it will be returned on completion, just like HS1 which is really quite inconspiuous in most places. Here's a view of HS1 passing under the A20 Ashford Road betweem Charing and Ashford.

For comparison, here's a view of the classi line that passes under the same road less than a kilometre north. Apart from the formation being narrower for obvious reasons, the long-term 'green land take' is quite similar.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
2,782
That's not really a good comparison. HS1 is much more like a classic railway in terms of environmental screening. HS2 is building screening embankments along much of it's length through open countryside, so whilst it will be fairly unobtrusive in >15 years, the permanent land take is still a lot higher. Of course much of that land will be a decent habitat for nature so that's a positive. Going to be a dull ride though I imagine
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,169
Location
Surrey
That's not really a good comparison. HS1 is much more like a classic railway in terms of environmental screening. HS2 is building screening embankments along much of it's length through open countryside, so whilst it will be fairly unobtrusive in >15 years, the permanent land take is still a lot higher. Of course much of that land will be a decent habitat for nature so that's a positive. Going to be a dull ride though I imagine
Like most HS lines in Europe your either in a tunnel or looking at a sound barrier but i guess its better than what you get in a plane!
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,870
And the "yoof" are all too glued to their screens to look out of the window anyway ;)
 

bib

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2021
Messages
180
Location
East Midlands
I read somewhere that there will be a view for 8 mins on a london to birmingham journey, the rest of the journey being in cuttings/tunnels or behind a sound barrier
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,450
Location
Bristol
And the "yoof" are all too glued to their screens to look out of the window anyway ;)
Yoof aren't the only ones, plenty of older people catching up on Netflix on the train.
I read somewhere that there will be a view for 8 mins on a london to birmingham journey, the rest of the journey being in cuttings/tunnels or behind a sound barrier
To be fair, it's little different to catching a train at night, and the countryside it passes through is hardly the Lakes or Dales.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,285
Location
St Albans
Like most HS lines in Europe your either in a tunnel or looking at a sound barrier but i guess its better than what you get in a plane!
Give that most of the rail travelling public ares not like rail enthusasts and not particulalry interested in the view, a trip to Brum from Euston in 50 minutes will be much preferred that one with 80 minutes of the existing WCML 'scenery'.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,870
To be fair, it's little different to catching a train at night, and the countryside it passes through is hardly the Lakes or Dales.
The Chilterns (which it correctly tunnels under) has some beautiful countryside.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,737
Location
Mold, Clwyd
To be fair, it's little different to catching a train at night, and the countryside it passes through is hardly the Lakes or Dales.
I'm reminded of the Canadian joke (not in Winnipeg) that it's best to cross Manitoba at night, as the scenery is better...

While European HS routes have all these visual and sound barriers in urban areas, there's plenty of clear views in the country.
Once north of Aylesbury, maybe things will open out a bit on HS2, until approaching Birmingham.
I wonder if our barriers will have pictures of birds on them, to stop them flying into the barriers and trains?
 

janahan

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2014
Messages
111
I'm reminded of the Canadian joke (not in Winnipeg) that it's best to cross Manitoba at night, as the scenery is better...

While European HS routes have all these visual and sound barriers in urban areas, there's plenty of clear views in the country.
To be fair, most of Europe is pretty flat, where as the UK is pretty undulating. This is apparent when riding the Eurostar from London to Paris, where in the UK you go through many embankments and cuttings, and despite the "leveling out" of the route, you can still feel the undulation a bit more. It may not be likely to see a lot of scenary 100% of the time, but nevertheless there will still be some stunning areas, such as the flyover the Denham lakes area.
Once north of Aylesbury, maybe things will open out a bit on HS2, until approaching Birmingham.
I wonder if our barriers will have pictures of birds on them, to stop them flying into the barriers and trains?
Does that actually work?
 

J-2739

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2016
Messages
2,056
Location
Barnsley/Cambridge
Give that most of the rail travelling public ares not like rail enthusasts and not particulalry interested in the view, a trip to Brum from Euston in 50 minutes will be much preferred that one with 80 minutes of the existing WCML 'scenery'.
Why don't we just specify the trains without windows, whilst we're at it? :D
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,450
Location
Bristol
Why don't we just specify the trains without windows, whilst we're at it? :D
:lol: Natural light is still important though. It'd be very dystopian to have viewscreens only, although I think there was a thread on it at one point.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,737
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Why don't we just specify the trains without windows, whilst we're at it? :D
At least initially, HS2 trains will be spending more time on the classic WCML routes than on HS2 itself, where the views will be quite good.
London-Birmingham services excepted of course.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
2,782
Once north of Aylesbury, maybe things will open out a bit on HS2, until approaching Birmingham.
They don't, the drawings are all online. Its pretty much all the way, except for the viaducts which will no doubt have screens of some sort
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top