Phil from Mon
Member
Pontypool Road on the Marches Line, now Pontypool and New Inn. Very busy junction with a large MPD and huge marshalling yard, now a single island platform devoid of buildings.
Inspired by the photograph of Bradford Exchange posted in the grubbiest stations thread, I wonder which of our active stations has seen the biggest decline? The kind of places that a young traveller today wouldn't believe were once impressive.
I'll start off with Stockton.
View attachment 129780
You're being rather kind to Christ's Hospital. It was massively overbuilt even for the standards of the time and started losing platforms within 20 years because there was never any serious junction traffic.Most locations which used to be significant junctions but aren't any more (like Christs Hospital mentioned previously) have some claim to be added to this list. Ashchurch and Kingham are a couple of examples which spring to mind.
Birmingham Snow Hill with both the original building and roof! Such a travesty to not only remove the beautiful building, but to place a car park where the glass roof was....
Very true....but the existing station is a listed building, so it would still have to be maintained - unlike now, it would appear - with trains running through non-stop.Agree about Perth; still a busy place but the most used platforms (the Dundee route) are the least impressive! The whole place needs replacing by a new station south of the junction.
I'll start off with Stockton.
I'm probably a bit older than you and remember it well from steam days. My maternal grandparents lived on the outskirts of Stockton and I was a frequent visitor and occasional traveller in my childhood and teenage years. A lot of the deterioration of the overall roof was doubtless caused by the blast from steam locos although - unlike its big sister at Darlington - Stockton received precious little in the way of painting or repairs in the latter days. Had the overall roof survived a few years longer it would probably have been listed. As well as the two full-length through platforms, it had three long-ish bays at the North end - two on the Up side and one on the Down, for local services to Durham via Ferryhill, Sunderland via Wingate and Port Clarence.I'm just old enough to remember the station like this - brings back happy memories of a young childhood. But it wasn't long before it deteriorated rapidly.
When I first visited Bridlington on a summer Sunday in 1972, it had nine platforms (5 through and 4 full length bays) and - as well as the hourly Hull-Scarborough DMU service (mainly Botanic Gardens-based class 105 Cravens units in formations of up to 8 cars) - there was a constant procession of excursion trains arriving from the South, hauled by class 31, 37, 40, 46 and 47 locos.I note both of you mention Bridlington. The last time I was there, it was still quite nicely done out with flower beds etc. Has it declined in the last couple of years?
P12 sees quite a lot of use actually. There's some timetabled use but in times of disruption, which are frequent, it is the only spare through platform capacity and so it sees frequent use by 'platform alterations'. NR's plans to make the station ready for HS2 (which look inadequate to me) do bring the P12 island into more use as you say.Crewe always seems lost without the P12 island (former P1/2 and bays) in heavy use.
Maybe this will return when HS2 arrives.
Eridge still has all the station buildings (including the original ticket office) in use. It has lost just one platform as there are two platforms available to use for Spa Valley Railway trains.Eridge has fallen less far than some others in the area - Uckfield isn't too bad, but East Grinstead is almost impossible to guess it once had a further 4 platforms above the current station. There's also Tunbridge Wells West, of course.
Could the reopening of the Ashington line to passenger services see a mini revival of Manors? Or does the timetable prevent more trains stopping there?It really has to be a strong contender. It was still the 'old' Manors last time i was there, but it must be difficult to imagine what it once was today, from the descriptions given. Even the view of Newcastle Central from the Keep is but a shadow of its former self.
Has anyone mentioned Pontypridd? I was shocked to see what an impressive layout it once was when I first trundled up the valley in about 1996.
It’s a pretty station but I believe it once had 7 platforms; now reduced to 3!I'm just old enough to remember the station like this - brings back happy memories of a young childhood. But it wasn't long before it deteriorated rapidly.
I note both of you mention Bridlington. The last time I was there, it was still quite nicely done out with flower beds etc. Has it declined in the last couple of years?
Wow! I spent a Saturday afternoon spottin' here in the summer of ... 63 I think. I knew it had an overall roof, but really - c'est magnifique - I'd forgotten how it was. Is this heading in the up direction? IS it a Sunday diversion?Inspired by the photograph of Bradford Exchange posted in the grubbiest stations thread, I wonder which of our active stations has seen the biggest decline? The kind of places that a young traveller today wouldn't believe were once impressive.
I'll start off with Stockton.
View attachment 129780
Although Fort William is actually a replacement station on a different site, built after the line was shortened by a quarter mile or soOban, Fort William, Connel Ferry.
Out of those three Connel is probably the biggest transformation.
Although Fort William is actually a replacement station on a different site, built after the line was shortened by a quarter mile or so
Oh boy, I wonder how grand it would've looked today. It's desecration reminds me off Penn station over the pond in NYCLondon Euston
Eridge has fallen less far than some others in the area - Uckfield isn't too bad, but East Grinstead is almost impossible to guess it once had a further 4 platforms above the current station. There's also Tunbridge Wells West, of course.