It smacks of quick write down every scheme we've even been vaguely thinking about as we need some stuff to announce in an hours time.So according to that list, Tavistock is reopening?
It smacks of quick write down every scheme we've even been vaguely thinking about as we need some stuff to announce in an hours time.So according to that list, Tavistock is reopening?
Trying to be analytic, the transport section of the speech is bundling up everything from IRP, current and RIS3 roads programmes, NR's minor schemes, miscellaneous 'reopen your railway', bus funding through BSOG/£2 fares, various local bids for development money for new bus routes etc etc etc zzzzzzzzzz.The Government has published a separate list here: This is a shorter list and doesn't give the same items. As far as I can see there are some items on this list not on the other list, and vice versa. So it's a little confusing.
Really? Through Atherstone and Lichfield and other twists south of Rugby. Drinks and laptops will fly off tables …. And at what cant deficiency?Tilt is dead (the WCML is already being reprofiled in places for 125mph non-tilt running with the 805s and 807s), but I'd expect to see 400km/h units (why slow it down when you've got less of it to gain?) but possibly of different lengths, i.e. between 250 and 300m long for better classic compatibility.
I think the consensus in a number of previous threads is that nobody actually knows what to use it for. Reopening is purely “because it’s there” - as they say about climbing Everest…It's hard to think what services could use the Leamside line if it were reopened. The issue being that any services would still hit capacity issues south of Ferryhill, so there's no new long distance services that could be added.
It could form part of the T&W Metro, though you think that would be mentioned if it that were the intention. It would be a long way to run a Metro service to reopen all of it, but if you only open as far as Fencehouses then it could work perhaps.
A Newcastle - Middlesbrough Northern service could come onto it, using the Stillington branch. That would fit with reopening Ferryhill. Such a service would be used, but it would be a lot of money spent to reopen a line to run a service that would between Teesside and Tyneside not serve anywhere very conveniently. You could have stations at:
* Washington, but not in the town centre
* Fencehouses or Shiney Row, but the settlements here are quite low density and distributed so there's no location which is all that convenient
* Belmont or Sherburn, though really Durham would be better served by having more services at its main station
You could reroute the TPE service along here but then who serves Chester-le-Street? I don't suppose CrossCountry will fancy it. And that seems no good for Durham which could go from one station to two stations 4-5 miles apart but with minimal extra services. And this wouldn't help congestion on the ECML because the TPE services would rejoin it south of Ferryhill.
I guess you could make some of these through services from Morpeth or the Metrocentre of some such in order to develop regional connections a bit more, though I doubt there is huge demand here.
It's not that enticing really.
So according to that list, Tavistock is reopening?
It seems that Euston will be redesigned to have only 6 platforms, which will make Phase 2 impossible to develop at a later stage. At what point does this turn into vandalism?
So the new new Euston plus tunnel from Old Oak scheme managed by someone other than HS2 (and magically without DfT triple guessing everything) has *no* funding allocated. Maybe funded by property development aka housing.
A single ten kilometre tunnel with a few kilometres of track at one end would allow you to go almost straight from Rochdale to the curve south of Halifax.Simple. Build a branch off NPR along the old Spen Valley route from Ravensthorpe to Low Moor. The alignment still exists as the Spen Valley Greenway and has not been built on. It even has an extant bridge over the M62.
And there is no need for a new station unless you build a new link from Interchange to Forster Square.
How is it feasible or possible to upgrade either of the existing lines between Liverpool and Manchester?My guess is the proposed new sections of NPR (Liverpool-Manchester Airport and Piccadilly-Marsden) are dead, with existing lines upgraded instead.
And there is no need for a new station unless you build a new link from Interchange to Forster Square.
It makes the train planning something of a pain, but I would hesitate to say it makes it "impossible".It seems that Euston will be redesigned to have only 6 platforms, which will make Phase 2 impossible to develop at a later stage. At what point does this turn into vandalism?
A better explanation of the decision is provided in this document https://assets.publishing.service.g...work-north-transforming-british-transport.pdf which sets out how the business case for the scheme has changed
Just a tad, nothing greater than a 16-17 minute turnaround.It makes the train planning something of a pain, but I would hesitate to say it makes it "impossible".
6 Platform termini have managed 18tph before, although there would have to be operational compromises.
De-scoped to an inch of its life I suspect. Something has to be done there, but anyone's guess as to what now.Where does this leave Crewe station? I was under the impression that as part of HS2 it was going to be completely remodelled and resignalled. Presumably that is no longer going ahead, but isn't the existing signalling nearly life-expired?
29. But as with the project overall, we will be getting a grip of plans for Euston
station itself. We have spent four years on two unaffordable designs, with a
gold-plated and over-specified station. That will change.
30. We are going to strip back the project and deliver a station that works, and
that can be open and running trains as soon as possible, and which has the
leadership in place to deliver maximum value to the taxpayer. We will not
provide a tunnel between Euston and Euston Square underground station or
design features we do not need. Instead we will deliver a 6-platform station
which can accommodate the trains we will run to Birmingham and onwards
and which best supports regeneration of the local area. That is how we
properly unlock the opportunities the new station offers, while radically
reducing its costs.
Ooh, a map, not seen that, can you link please?!!Did anyone notice on the govt map of the new stations M6 J16? Is this going to be some sort of parkway station for Crewe/Newcastle/etc
Says they plan to sell off all the land acquired for HS2 phase 2 within a year (salting the earth for Labour?)
Ooh, a map, not seen that, can you link please?!!
NR can start worrying about electrifying the line to Chester and beyond, and replacing all the signalling.De-scoped to an inch of its life I suspect. Something has to be done there, but anyone's guess as to what now.
Redoubling of the line towards Stoke should've been a priority, doubt this redirected funding will go towards itNR can start worrying about electrifying the line to Chester and beyond, and replacing all the signalling.
And maybe fixing the roof and canopies...
I don't think the red dots are all stations, they're projects. That one is covered on page 25 of the pdf: "Strategic road projects, such as the M6 Junction 15 between Manchester and Birmingham"Did anyone notice on the govt map of the new stations M6 J16? Is this going to be some sort of parkway station for Crewe/Newcastle/etc