D365
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 12,139
If indeed RM are sending vehicles straight for scrap… what commercial advantage does this give them compared to selling them on?
What is the significance of the move to Arpley? Is there a scrap facility there?
Interesting.I think it's most likely just a staging point in the DB yard at Arpley before the unit eventually moves somewhere else, perhaps to Newport for scrap as suggested in posts #274 to #279
It stops potential competitors from getting their hands on them. Varamis are known to be expanding and no doubt would have been quite keen on dedicated parcels units, but I suspect Royal Mail would have been more worried about the likes of DHL or Amazon.If indeed RM are sending vehicles straight for scrap… what commercial advantage does this give them compared to selling them on?
Royal Mail have contracted DB to carry out any further movements made by the 325s whilst in Royal Mail ownership, whether that be to scrap or until purchase by someone else.Interesting.
RM own the Class 325s so presumably they have to pay DB to move the trains to scrap?
Thanks for the info.It stops potential competitors from getting their hands on them. Varamis are known to be expanding and no doubt would have been quite keen on dedicated parcels units, but I suspect Royal Mail would have been more worried about the likes of DHL or Amazon.
Eurostar did similar with many of the unrefurbished 373s, scrapped them to stop anyone else from trying to set up a rival channel tunnel service with them.
Royal Mail have contracted DB to carry out any further movements made by the 325s whilst in Royal Mail ownership, whether that be to scrap or until purchase by someone else.
As well as the valid point above, a tender and sales process takes significantly longer than sending vehicles to scrap - and might end with the same result.If indeed RM are sending vehicles straight for scrap… what commercial advantage does this give them compared to selling them on?
Royal Mail may sell the units to a scrapyard on the condition that they are not resold as complete units, or sell them one or two at a time, selling them only as the previous one is put beyond use.If the units are sent for scrap, is there anything to stop Varamis or whoever buying them from the scrapyard?
They don’t have to pay to store and insure them and they can get rid of any in house work relating to owning trains.If indeed RM are sending vehicles straight for scrap… what commercial advantage does this give them compared to selling them on?
if it were possible to engage commercially with Porterbrook, the Class 325s ought to have a bountiful source of spares. The reality, however, is likely a very different story…Total destruction order. Not a rare thing and used frequently to prevent spares falling into the hands of other ROSCOs. Yet another wasteful result of our current state of railways
if it were possible to engage commercially with Porterbrook, the Class 325s ought to have a bountiful source of spares. The reality, however, is likely a very different story…
do 325s have any ETCS equipment?The 319s and 769s wouldn’t be a source for some of the most critical spares for the 325s at the moment.
Hopefully all the ETCS equipment gets pulled off for use elsewhere…
Was one of these applied to the 325s, or did royal mail just sell them to the scrapyard to get rid of them without caring if any spares get removed and sold on, or even the whole train gets resold?Total destruction order. Not a rare thing and used frequently to prevent spares falling into the hands of other ROSCOs. Yet another wasteful result of our current state of railways
Unknown, that's usually commercially sensitive.Was one of these applied to the 325s, or did royal mail just sell them to the scrapyard to get rid of them without caring if any spares get removed and sold on, or even the whole train gets resold?
Reminds me of the buses parked up at one PTE in the run up to deregulation, where they added sand to the engine or smashed parts of the engines off, so rhey couldn't be sold on to rival companies.Unknown, that's usually commercially sensitive.
But I've known TDOs to be placed on fleets with common spares by certain ROSCOs to prevent spares falling into the hands of fleets run by other ROSCOs.
4Z71 1201 Arpley Sidings to Alexandra Dock Jn. T.C. is in for ThursdayWould be great to know when that Newport move is planned.
I assume that those three are already lined up and ready to go.
Thought those three were still at Crewe IEMD?4Z71 1201 Arpley Sidings to Alexandra Dock Jn. T.C. is in for Thursday
It’s a different three units. The ones at IEMD will probably go later.Thought those three were still at Crewe IEMD?
I absolutely agree. It's especially outrageous because these would have been procured with public money and (with the current need to try to control road traffic and decarbonise transport generally) such waste should be unthinkable. The narrow commercial interests of one company should automatically be over-ridden by the national need.Total destruction order. Not a rare thing and used frequently to prevent spares falling into the hands of other ROSCOs. Yet another wasteful result of our current state of railways
Thought those three were still at Crewe IEMD?
003, 009 & 012 are reportedly at Arpley so some or all likely to be moved tomorrowIt’s a different three units. The ones at IEMD will probably go later.
Thanks, do you know if they can be seen from a public place at all?It’s a different three units. The ones at IEMD will probably go later.
I wouldn’t know, but some of the depot can usually be seen from the Crewe-Chester line. Just depends which part of the depot they’re in.Thanks, do you know if they can be seen from a public place at all?
66168 taking 325009 + 325003 + 325012 on their final journey4Z71 1201 Arpley Sidings to Alexandra Dock Jn. T.C. is in for Thursday
Thanks for confirming66168 taking 325009 + 325003 + 325012 on their final journey