Recent content by Dent

Are you suggesting that they blindly install cells at every station, even above ground stations which already have perfectly good coverage?

Whether "baked in" or not, the obstacles to trade due to not having access to the single market will continue to exist, and therefore continue to have the same consequence of stifling growth rate, for as long as we lack access to the single market. 1713719773 A reduction of trading...

I am not misunderstandings anything about how maths works. If the rate of growth continues to be stifled by the ongoing difficulties in trading due to not having access to the single market, that will continue to have a cumulative effect of GDP. How is it "not plausible" that making trading...

This is not just a single event, leaving the single market is a lasting change which makes trading more difficult, an therfore stifles growth, and will continue to do so until rejoining the single market.

Bening in an unfit state to work due to a medically diagnosed health condition is not a choice.

What does that even mean?

Does that not teach you that fighting over this undefined concept of "sovereignty" for no good reason is not a good idea?

Do you consider requiring that anything published is correct, and if it isn't then the error is corrected, to be "too prescriptive"? I would consider it to be a basic requirement which should be a given.

The length of the article depends how much there is to say, the point is that the correction should have equal prominence. Mandating the length of an article regardless of how much there actually is to say makes no sense, one line might be all there is to say.

Without commenting on whether this is a good idea, what you described would be prevented by the clause "issue a correction with equal prominence to the original claim".

It's been a week now, and the OP still hasn't been back to answer the fundamental question of why Labour might want to seek a coalition with the Conservatives when that they are likely to either have a majority government or at least be in a strong position to form a coalition with parties much...

Why? Labour are generally expected to get a majority art the next election, so why would it be in their interest to form a coalition with the Conservative party? Even if Labour don't get a majority, there are other parties closer to Labour that the could for a coalition with if they need to.

You should be able to check on any ticket machine with an Oyster reader.

There is another thread for this, where your claims of "respecting democracy" have already been answered many times.

Not a whole station, but the Thameslink platform at Wimbledon meets this description.