Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Tickets
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Mileage
2017 Mileage competition entry
2018 Mileage competition entry
2019 Mileage competition entry
2020 Mileage competition entry
2021 Mileage competition entry
2022 Mileage competition entry
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Registered members
Current visitors
Mileage
2017 Mileage competition entry
2018 Mileage competition entry
2019 Mileage competition entry
2020 Mileage competition entry
2021 Mileage competition entry
2022 Mileage competition entry
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Our booking engine at
tickets.railforums.co.uk
(powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in
this thread
!
Home
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
najaB's latest activity
najaB
replied to the thread
Donald Trump and the aftermath of his presidency
.
Because, of course, there were no wars or societal problems while he was president.
Yesterday at 22:43
najaB
replied to the thread
Norse Atlantic: experiences and opinions?
.
The only hope is that they have decent belly cargo.
Yesterday at 14:40
najaB
replied to the thread
The "And in other news..." thread
.
I'd like to think that he was on a final warning. If not, that is petty beyond belief.
Yesterday at 14:40
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
Exactly. Going "a bit quiet on" isn't the same as ditching a pledge.
Yesterday at 00:02
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
Which of them has he actually ditched? Note that most of them are presented as principles rather than specific goals.
Wednesday at 22:29
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
Given that circumstances have changed in large part due to government policies that he had no control over, I respect him more for...
Wednesday at 20:54
najaB
replied to the thread
Rishi Sunak and the Conservative Party.
.
Publicly? Of course not. Airlines are businesses, and as such their officers can be prosecuted. There's also precedent for...
Wednesday at 18:42
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
So it would be more accurate to say "I don't trust Starmer any more than I trust any other politician." While a perfectly valid and...
Wednesday at 17:54
najaB
replied to the thread
Rishi Sunak and the Conservative Party.
.
It's worth noting that the main reason that airlines have declined to take part is because they believe that the plan violates...
Wednesday at 17:53
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
"Very few" does mean that there are some though, right?
Wednesday at 16:54
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
Circling back to this... By saying that you don't trust Starmer specifically, there's an implication that there are current politicians...
Wednesday at 09:25
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
You're entitled to that view, but that is what the law says. I doubt the number of people who are truly at risk of persecution by their...
Tuesday at 21:07
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
If they had the intention or desire to claim asylum in France then they would have done so, so it's actually in the interest of the...
Tuesday at 20:21
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
Why, specifically? And what current politician(s) do you trust?
Tuesday at 16:40
najaB
replied to the thread
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party
.
Starmer might be Tory-lite, or he might just have recognised that, in order to be able to do anything good, you first have to be electable.
Tuesday at 16:30
Home
Members
Top