• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Are Stansted, Gatwick etc. "London airports"?

317 forever

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Messages
2,581
Location
North West
I'm pretty sure that a few years back I saw a proposal to make Kidlington another London Airport. Having Kiddles as 'London Oxford Airport' would be like having Denham as 'London Slough Airport' or Elstree as 'London Watford Airport'.
Heathrow could therefore be renamed London East Slough Airport :lol:
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

etr221

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,054
I'm pretty sure that a few years back I saw a proposal to make Kidlington another London Airport. Having Kiddles as 'London Oxford Airport' would be like having Denham as 'London Slough Airport' or Elstree as 'London Watford Airport'.
There was a proposal ten or twenty years ago - when there was all the discussion about where London's new airport (or great expansion of one) should be - for a new 'London Oxford' airport (LOX!) south west of Oxford. See http://www.pleiade.org/lox_preface.html - not sure if it ever got any further than a website...

And of course there is a London Airport 'LON' (or London International) - for what I have seen described as 'fake' London (even if it is on the Thames), in Ontario, Canada
 
Last edited:

gomango

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2020
Messages
78
Location
Falkirk
My own opinion:
Heathrow: Yes
Gatwick: Yes
Luton: Yes
City: Yes
Stansted: Yes
Cambridge: No way
Ashford: Closer to France than London :lol:
Oxford: No just no
Southend: No
Coventry: :lol:
 
Last edited:

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,359
My own opinion:
Heathrow: Yes
Gatwick: Yes
Luton: Yes
City: Yes
Stansted: Yes
Cambridge: No way
Ashford: Closer to France than London :lol:
Oxford: No just no
Southend: No
Coventry
Coventry is going just too far even for those who want a 'London' prefix. I guess that if one really wanted to wind up some folk from Coventry, one could suggest that it be called 'Birmingham Baginton'.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,153
Coventry is going just too far even for those who want a 'London' prefix. I guess that if one really wanted to wind up some folk from Coventry, one could suggest that it be called 'Birmingham Baginton'.
Birmingham East Airport :lol:
 

LBMPSB

Member
Joined
20 Apr 2019
Messages
126
The internationally recognised standard for location of an airport in relation to its city centre is 50km. Only City (0km), Heathrow (25km), Biggin Hill (29km) and Gatwick (45km) Airports fall into this category. Luton (54km), Stansted (63km), Southend (67km) & Oxford (95) Airports are outside the standard. But then transport accessibility is also a factor. Using the quickest transport methods, Gatwick and Luton are 30 mins from London. Stansted is 47 mins. Oxford, Biggin Hill, and Southend are 55 mins. Heathrow a short 14 mins, before the advent of fast trains direct from Paddington it was 35 mins by taxi, 55mins by Piccadilly Line. This is why I prefer using Eurostar when travelling to/from Europe, less hassle getting to and from airports, both ends.
 

miklcct

On Moderation
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
4,334
Location
Cricklewood
The internationally recognised standard for location of an airport in relation to its city centre is 50km. Only City (0km), Heathrow (25km), Biggin Hill (29km) and Gatwick (45km) Airports fall into this category. Luton (54km), Stansted (63km), Southend (67km) & Oxford (95) Airports are outside the standard. But then transport accessibility is also a factor. Using the quickest transport methods, Gatwick and Luton are 30 mins from London. Stansted is 47 mins. Oxford, Biggin Hill, and Southend are 55 mins. Heathrow a short 14 mins, before the advent of fast trains direct from Paddington it was 35 mins by taxi, 55mins by Piccadilly Line. This is why I prefer using Eurostar when travelling to/from Europe, less hassle getting to and from airports, both ends.
City, Heathrow, Biggin Hill are in London boundary. The others aren't.
 

etr221

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,054
The internationally recognised standard for location of an airport in relation to its city centre is 50km.
Do you have a source for this?

Not that I would dispute it as a normal 'standard of expectation' these days.
And my feeling is that over the years - perhaps since WW2 period is that the 'standard of expectation' has increased over the years - in the 1940s the c25km of Heathrow (and other proposals of the time) was 'normal'; but these days (2020s) approaching 100km is not out of the question. And I suspect city size, and the hardness of city definition, also have an impact.
Using the quickest transport methods, Gatwick and Luton are 30 mins from London. Stansted is 47 mins. Oxford, Biggin Hill, and Southend are 55 mins. Heathrow a short 14 mins, before the advent of fast trains direct from Paddington it was 35 mins by taxi, 55mins by Piccadilly Line. This is why I prefer using Eurostar when travelling to/from Europe, less hassle getting to and from airports, both ends.
I think time (etc) from city (measured from what might be thought of as the 'city air terminal', even if not defined/described as such) to airport are as important as distance.
And also the sorts of things that indicate whether the airport is in/close to the city, or out of/distant from it - is it in the same municipality/county/whatever, police area, public transport area, dialling code, postal district,...?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,693
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Schiphol, albeit tongue in cheek, has described itself as London's third airport.
To anybody outside the London catchment area and flying from UK regional airports, it's a viable notion.
Flying long-haul (from MAN) I certainly choose AMS over LHR any day.

London's future 3rd airport has at times been supposed to be located in Aylesbury Vale or the Essex marshes.
Today the proposed 3rd runway would obliterate the A4 north of the present Heathrow setup.
Birmingham Airport will be less than a hour's journey from parts of London (notably including Heathrow) when HS2 and Birmingham Interchange open.
Conversely, the interchange station at OOC will also make it easier to reach LHR from the west midlands and north west.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,836
Location
Wilmslow
Schiphol, albeit tongue in cheek, has described itself as London's third airport.
To anybody outside the London catchment area and flying from UK regional airports, it's a viable notion.
Flying long-haul (from MAN) I certainly choose AMS over LHR any day.
Likewise.
Knowing that I can walk between connecting planes is a big plus for Schipol also, knowing I don't have to get a bus or some other "transit" thing is great. The exercise is good for me!
 

etr221

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,054
Do you have a source for this?

Not that I would dispute it as a normal 'standard of expectation' these days.
And my feeling is that over the years - perhaps since WW2 period is that the 'standard of expectation' has increased over the years - in the 1940s the c25km of Heathrow (and other proposals of the time) was 'normal'; but these days (2020s) approaching 100km is not out of the question. And I suspect city size, and the hardness of city definition, also have an impact.

I think time (etc) from city (measured from what might be thought of as the 'city air terminal', even if not defined/described as such) to airport are as important as distance.
And also the sorts of things that indicate whether the airport is in/close to the city, or out of/distant from it - is it in the same municipality/county/whatever, police area, public transport area, dialling code, postal district,...?
Having thought further, it does occur to me that for most of the smaller British cities - I'm thinking of Birmingham, Manchester, Glasgow (Abbotsinch) have airports (which, to be honest, are smaller) only 10-20km away (I think only Glasgow (Prestwick) is substantially further).

And that (10-20km) is perhaps more normal globally, except for really big cities with really big new(-er) airports
 

Cloud Strife

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2014
Messages
1,819
And that (10-20km) is perhaps more normal globally, except for really big cities with really big new(-er) airports

Some Polish airports are even less than that. Poznań-Ławica is only 7km, Łódź is 6km, Warsaw-Okęcie is 8km. Only Szczecin (41km), Warsaw-Modlin (42km) and Olsztyn-Mazury (60km) really buck the trend here.
 

A S Leib

Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
780
Some Polish airports are even less than that. Poznań-Ławica is only 7km, Łódź is 6km, Warsaw-Okęcie is 8km. Only Szczecin (41km), Warsaw-Modlin (42km) and Olsztyn-Mazury (60km) really buck the trend here.
6 km for Southampton and under 5 km for Norwich.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,901
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
There's no question about Gatwick being a "London Airport".

The modern day Gatwick was originally built in the late 1950's (opened in 1958) specifically as London's 2nd airport, replacing several older, smaller London area airports.
It replaced the last remnants of Croydon airport, which had already run down to almost nothing after WW2, as well as Blackbushe and Bovingdon airports.
Most of Northolt's substantial commercial traffic, moved to Heathrow in the mid 50's.

The new Gatwick, was built mostly on the old racecourse and farmland to the north and west of the original 1930's airport of the same name.
The original 1930's "Beehive" terminal building, still stands in the middle of an industrial and business area, located half a mile to the south of the eastern end of the present day Gatwick runway.


.
Even its IATA code is LGW - London Gatwick
 

etr221

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,054
Searching IATA airport code base for London gave me four (and a metropolitan area):

City NameAirport Name3-letter location code
LondonBiggin HillBQH
LondonCity AirportLCY
LondonGatwickLGW
LondonMetropolitan AreaLON
LondonStanstedSTN

Spot what's missing!

So (going back to OP) Gatwick and Stansted both are, not many others.

Unfortunately the full list of codes is only available at great cost (USD1900 for a one time download!) - open data it is not... It would be interesting to see the full list, which covers not just airports.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,153
Searching IATA airport code base for London gave me four (and a metropolitan area):

City NameAirport Name3-letter location code
LondonBiggin HillBQH
LondonCity AirportLCY
LondonGatwickLGW
LondonMetropolitan AreaLON
LondonStanstedSTN

Spot what's missing!

So (going back to OP) Gatwick and Stansted both are, not many others.

Unfortunately the full list of codes is only available at great cost (USD1900 for a one time download!) - open data it is not... It would be interesting to see the full list, which covers not just airports.
Someone has posted a .csv file with the data - you can import it into Excel and see the full list if you wished.
 

etr221

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,054
Someone has posted a .csv file with the data - you can import it into Excel and see the full list if you wished.
Unfortunately - quite apart from the fact that (as far as I can see) it doesn't have a full list of IATA 'airport' codes (which includes codes for a lot of non-airports - including metropolitan areas and (airline relevant) railway stations, etc. - which are in some way the interesting entries) - it's not a 'spreadsheeet' .csv file, but one for the ip2location database.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,153
Unfortunately - quite apart from the fact that (as far as I can see) it doesn't have a full list of IATA 'airport' codes (which includes codes for a lot of non-airports - including metropolitan areas and (airline relevant) railway stations, etc. - which are in some way the interesting entries) - it's not a 'spreadsheeet' .csv file, but one for the ip2location database.
Hmm, I could have sworn I saw a spreadsheet style .csv file. Let me have another look
 
Last edited:

alholmes

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
252
Location
London E3
Schiphol, albeit tongue in cheek, has described itself as London's third airport.
Back in 2000 or 2001 Schiphol got a full-page feature in the London Evening Standard’s travel section, making exactly that point.

Schiphol asked KLM to find a typical passenger who used the airport instead of Heathrow or Gatwick, and came up with me - at the time I commuted between London City and Schiphol at least once a week, and often used Schiphol to transfer to other destinations.

The journalist did a telephone interview with me for about 30 minutes. All was good apart from being described as an Essex banker in the newspaper (I’m East London, definitely not Essex). And the article sensibly didn’t mention that we carried out the interview while I was waiting for a flight at Heathrow - the only time that year that I flew from LHR instead of LCY.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,739
Well I would have assumed that the Maplin Sands airport, if it had been built, would have been considered a London airport!

That's quite far out so I guess the range for London Airports is quite large.
 

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,359
Well I would have assumed that the Maplin Sands airport, if it had been built, would have been considered a London airport!

That's quite far out so I guess the range for London Airports is quite large.
I imagine that a high-speed railway link to central London would have been envisaged as part of the project. It's not so much distance as travelling time and convenience that is the major criterion here. Until the Piccadilly Line extension was built from Hounslow West I reckon that Heathrow was far less convenient than Gatwick for travelling to central London; indeed, even after its opening, the journey took longer and was considerably less convenient (air passengers with lots of luggage, commuters and tube stock don't happily mix) than travelling from Gatwick. It's only since fast main-line services to Paddington started that getting to and from Heathrow has been easier than Gatwick.
 

etr221

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
1,054
I imagine that a high-speed railway link to central London would have been envisaged as part of the project. It's not so much distance as travelling time and convenience that is the major criterion here. Until the Piccadilly Line extension was built from Hounslow West I reckon that Heathrow was far less convenient than Gatwick for travelling to central London; indeed, even after its opening, the journey took longer and was considerably less convenient (air passengers with lots of luggage, commuters and tube stock don't happily mix) than travelling from Gatwick. It's only since fast main-line services to Paddington started that getting to and from Heathrow has been easier than Gatwick.
Yes, a fast railway to Maplin was part of the project.

Something I think is now forgotten is that - into the 1970s I think - central air terminals were the normal, with (normally) bus links to the airport. For Heathrow there was a BEA terminal at Kensington (on top of Cromwell Curve), with an LT worked bus link; and a BOAC terminal at Victoria (they worked their own buses, AIUI). Remember in those days there were far fewer air passengers than now (in the 1960s 'normal' airliner capacity was about 100 (often less)); and security wasn't the concern it has become, so many (most?) people checked in at the air terminal.
 

Top