• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 701 'Aventra' trains for South Western Railway

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
869
Location
Ashford Middx
Personally I think it’s sensible to allow crew to get accustomed to them in the off peak, last thing you want is significant dwell times during the peaks as cautious crew are hesitant to drive as they used to, plus you’ve got to get familiar with DOO working which is probably completely different to how it works in the sims.
I agree up to a point, and obviously defer to your experience as you are in the industry IIRC. But at some point there is going to have to be a first time in the peak and the only way train crew will get used to different methods of driving/ dispatch at busy times is by doing it. Switching one out and back peak diagram would allow a gradual ramp up of the service and this shouldn't be too difficult on a Windsor circuit as these diagrams are self contained anyway.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,407
Location
SW London
Running again today, but RTT has not reported which unit is doing the honours.


Left Waterloo a few minutes late but so far not lost any more time

[EDIT] Now revealed to be unit 043
 
Last edited:

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,192
I agree up to a point, and obviously defer to your experience as you are in the industry IIRC. But at some point there is going to have to be a first time in the peak and the only way train crew will get used to different methods of driving/ dispatch at busy times is by doing it. Switching one out and back peak diagram would allow a gradual ramp up of the service and this shouldn't be too difficult on a Windsor circuit as these diagrams are self contained anyway.

To switch a whole unit diagram to a 701 would be a crewing nightmare, several depots work Windsor services, so you’d have to have a sufficient number of crew trained on them across a variety of depots to allow a M-F diagram to be converted.

This is potentially a valid criticism of the company however with industrial relations regarding the stock not being the best, it’s not a surprise.

I agree though there will have to be a first time at some point.
 

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
869
Location
Ashford Middx
To switch a whole unit diagram to a 701 would be a crewing nightmare, several depots work Windsor services, so you’d have to have a sufficient number of crew trained on them across a variety of depots to allow a M-F diagram to be converted.

This is potentially a valid criticism of the company however with industrial relations regarding the stock not being the best, it’s not a surprise.

I agree though there will have to be a first time at some point.

Couldn't they just do a unit swap at Windsor though for an out an back peak trip? Effectively the current service is running as an extra so there are presumably crews for this
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,192
Couldn't they just do a unit swap at Windsor though for an out an back peak trip? Effectively the current service is running as an extra so there are presumably crews for this

Potentially you could, however on paper it could be tricky to path the platform capacity and paths in and out of Wimbledon during the peaks. Not impossible but would require a rework. Might be more operationally convenient to wait for a timetable PA or the June timetable change.
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,135
I agree up to a point, and obviously defer to your experience as you are in the industry IIRC. But at some point there is going to have to be a first time in the peak and the only way train crew will get used to different methods of driving/ dispatch at busy times is by doing it. Switching one out and back peak diagram would allow a gradual ramp up of the service and this shouldn't be too difficult on a Windsor circuit as these diagrams are self contained anyway.
But aren't driver managers driving these trains, so the intended drivers are not getting any experience at all?
 

SEtrains

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
89
Location
Greater London
Are these new 701 diagrams ?
It’s only one round trip and it’s an additional Windsor and Eton riverside service



 

Train Boy

Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
320
Location
-
But aren't driver managers driving these trains, so the intended drivers are not getting any experience at all?

Has been a driver every time I have been on it, although there are normally some managers onboard.
 

infobleep

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
12,670
To switch a whole unit diagram to a 701 would be a crewing nightmare, several depots work Windsor services, so you’d have to have a sufficient number of crew trained on them across a variety of depots to allow a M-F diagram to be converted.

This is potentially a valid criticism of the company however with industrial relations regarding the stock not being the best, it’s not a surprise.

I agree though there will have to be a first time at some point.
I've not followed all of this thread so it nay have been answr4ed in post X, but when the 701 were being procured, were any drivers and guards involved in the process? After all they would be the ones using it day in, day out.
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,395
Location
Betchworth, Surrey
Potentially you could, however on paper it could be tricky to path the platform capacity and paths in and out of Wimbledon during the peaks. Not impossible but would require a rework. Might be more operationally convenient to wait for a timetable PA or the June timetable change.
Yes, no rush after four years of farce!
 

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
869
Location
Ashford Middx
Potentially you could, however on paper it could be tricky to path the platform capacity and paths in and out of Wimbledon during the peaks. Not impossible but would require a rework. Might be more operationally convenient to wait for a timetable PA or the June timetable change.
Thanks. I realise nothing is ever simple.. presumably one could come out of Feltham depot or Staines sidings though to avoid the Wimbledon issue? Or they could just run an extra trip in the peak instead of the middle of the day. Plenty of capacity on the Windsor lines in the peak with the removal of services.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,076
Thanks. I realise nothing is ever simple.. presumably one could come out of Feltham depot or Staines sidings though to avoid the Wimbledon issue? Or they could just run an extra trip in the peak instead of the middle of the day. Plenty of capacity on the Windsor lines in the peak with the removal of services.
Just a bit. Windsor lines in the peaks have lost a lot of capacity, as well as off peak.
 

SEtrains

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
89
Location
Greater London
Are these new 701 diagrams ?
It’s only one round trip and it’s an additional Windsor and Eton riverside service



What exactly is the purpose of these additional services? And what is the chance that it’s another 701 diagram
 

deepeetw

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2012
Messages
70
Had my first ride on one of these today - sat in one of the window bays with the mini table. I found it the build out of the window pillars tight on the shoulder - which pushed me into the seat space next to me.

Don’t think it would be at all comfortable sitting there with another passenger sat next to you.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,257
Location
West Wiltshire
Government has blocked a BBC request for cost of how much money was being paid to Rock Rail, the owner of the trains that are not carrying any passengers, as well as asking for the cost of storing unused trains. BBC also inquired about the cost of retaining and maintaining other rolling stock where the leases have been extended to cover the absence of the new trains.

The Department for Transport (DfT) said answering the BBC's Freedom of Information (FOI) request could "prejudice commercial interests".
The Derby-built carriages, originally ordered for £1bn, have been delayed by numerous software faults.
Other reported issues have included the coupling process, faulty windscreen wipers and cab doors that were difficult to open.
SWR has accepted 71 of 90 trains from manufacturer Alstom and is running three of them in a trial.
The BBC asked how much money was being paid to Rock Rail, the owner of the trains that are not carrying any passengers, as well as asking for the cost of storing unused trains.
We also inquired about the cost of retaining and maintaining other rolling stock where the leases have been extended to cover the absence of the new trains.


Apparently 71 of 90 units now accepted, does anyone have a list of 19 not yet accepted. I know it includes some early units which needed rework
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,076
Had my first ride on one of these today - sat in one of the window bays with the mini table. I found it the build out of the window pillars tight on the shoulder - which pushed me into the seat space next to me.

Don’t think it would be at all comfortable sitting there with another passenger sat next to you.
Yes, I've found that. Same as on the 450s, where I always avoid a seat if there's a pillar next to it.

On the 701s not all table seat bays are like that.
 

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
869
Location
Ashford Middx
Government has blocked a BBC request for cost of how much money was being paid to Rock Rail, the owner of the trains that are not carrying any passengers, as well as asking for the cost of storing unused trains. BBC also inquired about the cost of retaining and maintaining other rolling stock where the leases have been extended to cover the absence of the new trains.




Apparently 71 of 90 units now accepted, does anyone have a list of 19 not yet accepted. I know it includes some early units which needed rework
Not surprising, it must be very embarrassing.

71 out of 90 and still nowhere near a proper introduction in to service. Why have they been accepted in that case? I guess a(nother) poorly negotiated contract.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,076
What exactly is the purpose of these additional services? And what is the chance that it’s another 701 diagram
According to that SWR brief that was shared on a post on this thread the shadow running services will be used for staff training, so that's presumably what's happening.

Not surprising, it must be very embarrassing.

71 out of 90 and still nowhere near a proper introduction in to service. Why have they been accepted in that case? I guess a(nother) poorly negotiated contract.
At least the mainstream media is now on to it.

I can't agree that they're "still nowhere near a proper introduction into service". Surely that'll be very soon now, probably in the Spring.
 

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
869
Location
Ashford Middx
According to that SWR brief that was shared on a post on this thread the shadow running services will be used for staff training, so that's presumably what's happening.


At least the mainstream media is now on to it.

I can't agree that they're "still nowhere near a proper introduction into service". Surely that'll be very soon now, probably in the Spring.
Only 3 or 4 units have actually run a service haven't they? It feels like a lot needs to happen quite quickly for things to start ramping up in spring.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,257
Location
West Wiltshire
I can't agree that they're "still nowhere near a proper introduction into service". Surely that'll be very soon now, probably in the Spring.
It actually states 769 drivers will be trained.

If allow generous 2 weeks and say 5 drivers each morning/lunch and 5 drivers each afternoon/evening then only doing 20 drivers a month. Athough if a driver is familiar with 707s do they really need 2 weeks for type conversion.

What I can't fathom is originally introduction was October 2019 to early December 2020 (by timetable change date), 14 months, so why would full introduction now be slowed down and take longer than 14 months, as now suggests going to drag it out over 18 months.
 

SEtrains

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
89
Location
Greater London

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,076
It actually states 769 drivers will be trained.

If allow generous 2 weeks and say 5 drivers each morning/lunch and 5 drivers each afternoon/evening then only doing 20 drivers a month. Athough if a driver is familiar with 707s do they really need 2 weeks for type conversion.

What I can't fathom is originally introduction was October 2019 to early December 2020 (by timetable change date), 14 months, so why would full introduction now be slowed down and take longer than 14 months, as now suggests going to drag it out over 18 months.
I suppose it depends how you define "proper introduction into service". I assume you mean that to be every unit in service, whereas for me it means the first couple of units on all-day diagrams.

Only 4 more 701s to be built right ? Or are they already built ?
Should have all been built by now. The production line was due to be closed last month.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,710
Location
Croydon
It actually states 769 drivers will be trained.

If allow generous 2 weeks and say 5 drivers each morning/lunch and 5 drivers each afternoon/evening then only doing 20 drivers a month. Athough if a driver is familiar with 707s do they really need 2 weeks for type conversion.

What I can't fathom is originally introduction was October 2019 to early December 2020 (by timetable change date), 14 months, so why would full introduction now be slowed down and take longer than 14 months, as now suggests going to drag it out over 18 months.
Twenty drivers a month (well four weeks) seems like agony. That's 77 fortnights (769 / 10 rounded up) or 154 weeks (77 x 2), that's almost three years (nearly 156 weeks).
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,135
Twenty drivers a month (well four weeks) seems like agony. That's 77 fortnights (769 / 10 rounded up) or 154 weeks (77 x 2), that's almost three years (nearly 156 weeks).
The trains will nearly be off lease by then! (Ok, slight exageration)
 

Top