• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Government announces additional funding for Yorkshire and the Humber

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,246
Location
York
  • £4.7 billion of reallocated HS2 funding invested directly into the North and Midlands through the Local Transport Fund to improve local connections
  • local leaders in smaller cities, towns and rural areas empowered for the first time to invest in transport upgrades that matter the most to their communities
  • comes alongside £8.3 billion to resurface roads across the country, £1 billion to improve bus services in the North and Midlands, and £200million to extend the £2 bus fare cap across England – all from reallocated HS2 funding
  • comes as Prime Minister hosts Cabinet meeting in Yorkshire and the Humber
Millions of people in the North and the Midlands will benefit from better public transport, reduced congestion and upgraded local bus and train stations thanks to the new £4.7 billion Local Transport Fund announced today (Monday 26 February).

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Transport Secretary Mark Harper have confirmed that the North will receive £2.5 billion and the Midlands will receive £2.2 billion from April 2025 to improve local transport connections that so many people rely on every day, particularly across smaller cities, towns, and rural areas.

This investment - announced as part of Network North - will deliver an unprecedented long-term funding uplift across the North and Midlands over seven years. It’s the first transport budget of its kind that’s specifically targeted at smaller cities, towns and rural areas and empowers local people and local leaders to invest in the transport projects that matter most to their communities – helping create jobs, grow the economy, and level up the country.

Over the 7 years as a whole this funding will be on average at least 9 times more than these local authorities currently receive through the local integrated transport block which is the current mechanism for funding local transport improvements in their areas.

The Local Transport Fund will be made available from 2025 to give local authorities enough time to develop their funding plans and prepare to hit the ground running to ensure they are delivered as soon as possible.

It comes as the Prime Minister is set to chair a Cabinet meeting in Yorkshire today where he is expected to call on ministers and MPs to hold local authorities to account to ensure the funding is used appropriately and that the voices of local people are heard when decisions are made on where this funding goes and how this funding is spent.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said:

We have a clear plan to level up our country with greater transport links that people need and deliver the right long term change for a brighter future.
Through reallocating HS2 funding, we’re not only investing billions of pounds directly back into our smaller cities, towns and rural areas across the North and Midlands, but we are also empowering their local leaders to invest in the transport projects that matter most to their communities - this is levelling up in action.
The Local Transport Fund will deliver a new era of transport connectivity. This unprecedented investment will benefit more people, in more places, more quickly than HS2 ever would have done, and comes alongside the billions of pound worth of funding we’ve already invested into our roads, buses and local transport services across the country.
This investment will give local authorities long term certainty to invest in transformative and ambitious transport improvements from 2025 through to 2032 including:

  • building new roads and improving junctions
  • installing or expanding mass transit systems
  • improving roads by filling in potholes and better street lighting for personal safety
  • improving journey times for car and bus users by tackling congestion
  • increasing the number of EV chargepoints
  • refurbishing bus and rail stations
  • improving our streets so they are safer to walk children to school and increasing accessibility for all
To ensure local authorities can make the most of this unprecedented funding, the department will publish advice for local councils and transport authorities to help them develop ambitious plans to improve local transport infrastructure in their areas.

Councils will work with local MPs and will be held to account by the government as well as their communities to make sure the money is spent promptly and effectively. Local councils will be expected to publish their delivery plans for which projects they wish to invest in.

The funding comes as devolution deals now cover nearly 34 million, or 60% of the English population – up from 41% since the first major levelling up plan 2 years ago, as the government continues to empower local leaders.

Transport Secretary Mark Harper said:

Today’s £4.7 billion investment is truly game-changing for the smaller cities, towns, and rural communities across the North and the Midlands and is only possible because this government has a plan to improve local transport and is willing to take tough decisions like reallocating funding from the second phase of HS2.
This funding boost will make a real difference to millions of people, empowering local authorities to drive economic growth, transform communities, and improve the daily transport connections that people rely on for years to come.
Today’s funding is directed to the North and Midlands because the majority of HS2 savings are specifically from those regions. The Local Transport Fund is also specifically for communities in the North and Midlands which are outside City Regions which receive City Region Sustainable Transport Settlements (CRSTS).

The new funding allocations means neighbouring authorities who were not eligible for CRSTS can now drive forward similar infrastructure improvements, and all local authorities in the North and Midlands will now have long-term settlements from Network North to boost local transport.

The North East is separately receiving £3.7 billion from CRSTS from now until 2032, which includes an uplift of more than £1 billion from Network North, boosting local transport across the Tees Valley and the North East.

Lord Patrick McLoughlin, Chair of Transport for the North, said:

We welcome this funding for our local transport areas as a sign of progress towards transforming the north to a more inclusive, sustainable and better-connected region. By having greater clarity on the funding that’s available, and consolidating funding streams, it helps remove inertia and accelerates delivery on the ground.
TfN look forward to working with government and local leaders, because we know that the travelling public will get better results the more locally the decisions are made on how those services should be provided.
Maria Machancoses, Chief Executive of Midlands Connect, said:

This funding represents a significant investment in our region’s infrastructure. The Midlands contributes more than £90billion to the UK economy, and to boost that even more, we need reliable transport networks and investment in new technology.
We welcome this announcement and the improvements it will bring for our communities and businesses across the Midlands, and we will continue to work with government and support our local authorities, to ensure these vital Network North transport upgrades are delivered.
This investment demonstrates our commitment to reinvest all of the £19.8 billion from the Northern leg of HS2 in the North and all of the £9.6 billion from the Midlands leg in the Midlands, while the £6.5 billion saved through the new approach at Euston will be spread across every other region in the country.

As part of Network North, we have also committed to delivering the Midlands Rail Hub by increasing investment to £1.75 billion to improve journey times, capacity and frequency of services across the East and West Midlands. We will also enable the West Yorkshire Mayor to take forward a £2.5 billion mass-transit metro in West Yorkshire.

We’ve committed £12 billion towards better connecting Manchester to Liverpool. This would allow the delivery of Northern Powerhouse Rail as previously planned, including high-speed lines. But we will work with local leaders to agree whether they wish to suggest other ways to achieve the objectives with that £12 billion.

£100 million will also be shared across the North and Midlands to support the development and rollout of contactless and smart ticketing, supporting seamless travel by enabling contactless or smartcard payment. 

Savings at Euston ensure the rest of the country receives extra transport investment too from our decision to cancel HS2 Phase 2. Every part of the country is set to benefit from the decision to reallocate funding from HS2. We’re already delivering the biggest ever increase in funding for local road improvements with an extra £8.3 billion, enough to resurface more than 5,000 miles of local roads across England, with the first tranche of funding already being delivered right from this financial year. As part of this, we’re providing an additional £2.8 billion to resurface roads in the East, South-East and South-West England and London.

We’ve also invested over £200 million to extend the £2 bus fare cap in England outside London until the end of 2024 and will spend £1 billion to improve bus services in the North and the Midlands, with £150 million delivered from April this year. Since the £2 bus fare cap was introduced across England on 1 January 2023, millions of passengers have benefited from lower fares.

Taken together, these investments are all part of the government’s plan to build a brighter future for generations to come by levelling up transport infrastructure across the country.

This amount of money is a complete slap in the face from what we (the North) would've gotten from HS2. Once again the use of saved funding from HS2 is questionable given those savings don't exist.

TSSA rail union has accused the Conservative government of ‘totally lacking ambition’ after it was announced that £4.7bn of the money saved from scrapping the northern legs of HS2 will be spent as part of a ‘local transport fund’.

The Department for Transport claim that this money will be spent on transport projects in smaller towns and cities in the Midlands and North of England. Such projects may include filling potholes and refurbishing bus stations.

TSSA, the recognised union for directly employed HS2 staff, believe that high speed rail is the only clean and green way to support our local, regional, and national economies in the decades ahead.

Commenting, Maryam Eslamdoust, TSSA General Secretary said: “The Conservative government has once again shown that it is totally lacking ambition. This redirection of funding will do nothing to fix our crumbling transport infrastructure that has suffered from 14 years of Tory mismanagement and neglect.

“Rishi Sunak’s government betrayed the North when they announced they were halting HS2 at Birmingham. The government are now tinkering around the edges of their broken system and will once again be leaving the public short changed.

“The Conservatives have let our transport network fall into disrepair over 14 years of misrule and are now using this money as a sticking plaster to try and hide the damage they have caused.

“Britain needs a publicly owned green high speed rail network. We need a new government that is ambitious enough to commit to building HS2 in full. The Conservatives have shown that they no longer have the ideas or ambition to run Britain’s transport system, they should make way for a government which does.”

Completely agree, this isn't good enough for the North.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HullRailMan

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
330
Hull and the East Riding are set for £350m plus electrification from Hull to Sheffield and Leeds. HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,294
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
Hull and the East Riding are set for £350m plus electrification from Hull to Sheffield and Leeds. HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.
And they've been saying that for how long? Didn't Hull Trains did once have a plan to do that, until the government came along and said we'll do it under Northern Power House Rail, then Network North...
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
3,879
I still don't understand what sane person thinks using capital funding to do basic street repairs is acceptable. Fund local councils properly, and then they can do the job like the always used to
 

Grimsby town

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2011
Messages
404
Hull and the East Riding are set for £350m plus electrification from Hull to Sheffield and Leeds. HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.
Probably not right to say Hull would have gained nothing from HS2. I know for a fact that consideration was being given to additonal London services and direct Birmingham services were being considered thanks to released capacity.

Electrification is needed but isn't going to lead to significant increases in train services. The announcement represents a significant shift of funding away from rail and most likely towards roads. I also have serious reservations that Local Authorities have the staff to deliver projects with this funding. They struggle to deliver their current projects.
 

IBLRG

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2022
Messages
47
Location
Brigg Line
The statement from North Lincolnshire Council.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240226-140255_Gmail.jpg
    Screenshot_20240226-140255_Gmail.jpg
    179.2 KB · Views: 154

Grimsby town

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2011
Messages
404
The statement from North Lincolnshire Council.
Politicians are really overselling this too. I welcome new funding for local transport schemes. It desperately needed. I worry that this would just replace money from other funding sources such as leveling up. Still at least it would be a more certain funding stream.

I really don't think a couple £100 million over 7 years buys that much in this country. Its not going to lead to mass rail reopenings or loads of bus services improvements. It's probably going to mean the odd new rail station and bus station, a fleet of new buses, a dozen junction improvements, and a couple of decent walking and cycling routes. A step in the right direction but hardly 'transformation' that politicians are claiming.
 

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
1,678
Could this and anything from the Westminster Britain breakers be automatically transferred to Speculative Discussion please?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,044
Location
Yorks
Well. I see little eye-catching that will improve the lot of rail passengers day to day experience. Not even much to counteract running the railway into the ground over the past two years.

The investment in buses is good (although if they can afford the £2 bus fare they should be able to afford a national railcard) but mostly it reads as a list of roadworks.

So it's a massive fail from me I'm afraid (cue failure klaxon from Family Fortunes).
 

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,246
Location
York
Hull and the East Riding are set for £350m plus electrification from Hull to Sheffield and Leeds. HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.
Not everyone seems to think it's so great. See: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0hf8klm
A rail expert has claimed that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's pledge to invest in the Humber's transport infrastructure doesn't amount to new money, following the cancellation of HS2.
Gareth Dennis is an engineer and writer, specialising in transport systems and policy.
The above is the description, the podcast is 2 minutes long.
 

johntea

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
2,602
They certainly already capture the spirit of HS'2' on many routes in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, namely '2' carriages!
 

paulmch

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
97
Hull and the East Riding are set for £350m plus electrification from Hull to Sheffield and Leeds. HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.

Given that the land had already been purchased and shovels are already in the ground for HS2 and that was still cancelled for the most part, why would anyone trust a word that comes out of their slimy little mouths with regard to any other infrastructure project?
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,442
Location
York
HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.
NPR would have. Hull to Sheffield and Leeds was always planned for wiring and I believe Hull to Leeds would’ve been well sped up
 

mike57

Established Member
Joined
13 Mar 2015
Messages
1,679
Location
East coast of Yorkshire
Hull and the East Riding are set for £350m plus electrification from Hull to Sheffield and Leeds. HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.
Assuming you do Hull to Sheffield via Goole and Hull to Leeds via Selby then that is about 110 route miles, I would be very surprised if that can be done for £350m based on recent electrification project costs or anything even close. I would also question when it might be delivered, based on the glacial pace to Transpennine electrification, which has to be a higher priority.

Very much a case of 'Jam tomorrow' and thats if there is any left...
 
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
508
Location
God Knows
A cynical election year scheme using our imaginary HS2 money. The gig is up, they're toast this year either way.


Hull and the East Riding are set for £350m plus electrification from Hull to Sheffield and Leeds. HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.

I will believe it when I see it. They'll spunk that £350m on consultants and then decide not to do it.
 

mike57

Established Member
Joined
13 Mar 2015
Messages
1,679
Location
East coast of Yorkshire
A cynical election year scheme using our imaginary HS2 money. The gig is up, they're toast this year either way.
Not sticking up for the current lot, because comparing them to a bunch of clowns would probably result in me being placed on some hit list maintained by clowns, but I am not hearing anything better from the other lot.

Until the underlying cost control issues which seem to make rail projects into black holes for money are addressed major infrastructure improvements are going to be difficult to impliment. After the HS2 debacle, which has led to this round of spin no politician of any party is going to willingly get involved with supporting and delivering major rail projects.

When would wires reach Hull? 2040? 2050? 20 years is at least 4 political cycles.

Personally I would like to see some more immediate improvements, for example rolling stock orders which allow for passenger numbers to increase, rather than the "well 4 coaches would make sense, but we will give you 3" which was the 185 approach, and the current XC issues where more capacity is needed.
 

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,246
Location
York
I'd take anything Gareth Dennis utters with a massive pinch of salt...
He's correct on the "Saved funding" from HS2 Phase 2 being cancelled. He's also correct on the Hull-Leeds electrification being cancelled and re-announced constantly.
 

HullRailMan

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
330
Assuming you do Hull to Sheffield via Goole and Hull to Leeds via Selby then that is about 110 route miles, I would be very surprised if that can be done for £350m based on recent electrification project costs or anything even close. I would also question when it might be delivered, based on the glacial pace to Transpennine electrification, which has to be a higher priority.

Very much a case of 'Jam tomorrow' and thats if there is any left...
The £350m is in addition to the electrification, not to pay for it. Whether it happens or not remains to be seen, but, if it does, electrification of these lines and investment in local buses will benefit far more people in Hull/East Riding than HS2 would.

And they've been saying that for how long? Didn't Hull Trains did once have a plan to do that, until the government came along and said we'll do it under Northern Power House Rail, then Network North...
HT did have a plan and would have paid for it too, and it’s a shame it didn’t happen.

Not everyone seems to think it's so great. See: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0hf8klm

The above is the description, the podcast is 2 minutes long.
Gareth Dennis is very pro HS2 so hardly an impartial assessment.

Probably not right to say Hull would have gained nothing from HS2. I know for a fact that consideration was being given to additonal London services and direct Birmingham services were being considered thanks to released capacity.

Electrification is needed but isn't going to lead to significant increases in train services. The announcement represents a significant shift of funding away from rail and most likely towards roads. I also have serious reservations that Local Authorities have the staff to deliver projects with this funding. They struggle to deliver their current projects.
Are you able to provide evidence to support that “fact”?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,044
Location
Yorks
Until the underlying cost control issues which seem to make rail projects into black holes for money are addressed major infrastructure improvements are going to be difficult to impliment. After the HS2 debacle, which has led to this round of spin no politician of any party is going to willingly get involved with supporting and delivering major rail projects.


Major projects aside there are other things that could be done to genuinely make things better for prospective passengers.

Look at the various fares innovations that have been happening in Europe - real innovation, as opposed to the crock of c**p that LNER are foisting upon us.
 

3RDGEN

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2023
Messages
256
Location
Hull
Hull and the East Riding are set for £350m plus electrification from Hull to Sheffield and Leeds. HS2 would have given us nothing. Doesn’t seem like a “slap in the face” to me.
Correct, at least the rest of the North now gets something from the money instead of just the Mids/Nth West areas. The Hull area has the best train service it's had for decades, if not ever, following the Northern service/train improvements of the last few years and this money can build on that.
 

GJMarshy

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2023
Messages
70
Location
Manchester
A reminder HS2 funding cannot be "reallocated". I'm sure most already know this, but we should call it out wherever we see it. I've found this a very useful tool to stop the misinformation and help the wider public understand the reality of the issue. (It's my own graphic so I don't have an issue with anyone sharing it on social media etc to help dispel this myth)

HS2 Reallocation.001.jpeg
 

3RDGEN

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2023
Messages
256
Location
Hull
And given the time it's taking to electrify the Transpennine route, even if it happens, I won't live to see it.
At least it's back on the agenda and there is potential money for it. I would assume it would follow TPE TRU as resources allow so mid 2030's maybe a best guess at this point, similar to when HS2 might of reached Manchester/East Midlands.
 

Grimsby town

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2011
Messages
404
Are you able to provide evidence to support that “fact”?
Steer Davies Gleave did a capacity study on HS2 that included an hourly Hull to London service. If the full Y was built, an hourly London to Hull train is a no brainer.

I don't think the Birmingham information is in the public domain. Even with the Western leg only, there was a possibility of running a Hull to Manchester to Birmingham. I've seen proposals for diverting crosscountry to Hull too to stop them travelling north and interacting with HS2 trains.

Of course none of this is a guarantee that it would happen. Its guaranteed that it won't happen without HS2 or a significant rail upgrade.
 

Grimsby town

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2011
Messages
404
What route did it follow from HS2 to Hull? Did it assume any extra junctions on HS2?
It was additional services on the ECML to London, using released capacity, rather than a Hull HS2 service. Sorry, I didn't really make that clear.
 

Top