• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

June 2024 Timetable Change

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,269
Location
West of Andover
Which actually leads to a downgrade for Chelmsford - Stratford passengers with 5 tph reduced to 4tph. Ideally, both Intercity services per hour should call at Stratford in the off-peak. It's an increasingly popular place to change trains and as a destination.
And especially when the nonstop service catches up with the Ipswich stopper so will likely be crawling through the station at any rate. Cost of an extra couple of minutes(?) to call there to open up more passenger journey opportunities?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,776
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
In exactly the same way as the various foreign railways that are / used to be viewed enviously for their reliability. A journey time of 40 minutes sounds better than 46. However, there’s a lot to be said for “46 minutes 98% of the time” over “40 minutes on a perfect day - otherwise take your pick of anything with a number that starts with “f” at the front”

I’m not entirely convinced that’s what ends up happening. On the GN, the Cambridge stopping service was timed to take 40 minutes between King’s Cross and Hitchin in 317 days, though to be fair achieving this required *very* slick work from the driver, 42 minutes was more typical. In May 2018 the same journey was timed to take 52 minutes, and in today’s timetable takes 47 minutes with an extra stop.

In practice, in 317 days the train went as fast as possible, and if it got delayed then so be it. Now you either get held everywhere, or delayed if there’s stuff going on. So you simply lose out *all* of the time instead of *some* of it. And in my experience it’s made no real difference to dependability at all.

It’s rather unfortunate that with trains which have better performance, are longer, and supposedly designed for quick boarding and alighting, that we can’t match let alone beat 1990s timings with good old 317s.

Perhaps I’m just a glass-half-empty person!

Having said all that, there’s not much point in having timings which can’t really be achieved in practice.
 
Joined
30 Oct 2019
Messages
114
Location
GEML
From a performance point of view GA's new timetable is a disappointment. Local trains still essentially timed for 321 performance rather than 720's.I'm not seeing any retimings of the GE services.
The initial timings stated for 720s were far below their potential, but now they have been slowed down even more:
Only a few examples include:
  • Shenfield to Liverpool St up ½ minute
  • Chelmsford to Shenfield up ½ minute
  • Southend Victoria to Shenfield up 1½ minutes
  • Marks Tey to Colchester (this direction only) up ½ minute
  • Manningtree to Colchester (this direction only) up ½ minute
  • Braintree to Witham slower than 321 timings, by ½ minute
Branch line timings: Harwich, Southminster, Walton, Clacton in some locations have gone down by ½ minute in places but are then offset towards the end of the line by an extra ½ minute. These juggled around ½ minutes accordingly have no benefit.
The xx:48 Liverpool Street to Braintree service ahead of the xx:00 Norwich could easily have been speeded up a few minutes which would have meant a faster time for the xx;00 to Colchester.
This service would be 2 minutes faster if the adjustment allowance approaching Witham was changed. Before, ½ minute was added for movements to the side platforms, now this has increased to 2.
It looks like a tweaking of dwell times and removing Chelmsford stop is how the xx:30 and it's equivalent return have improved the schedule to Norwich by a few minutes - while sectional running times seem unchanged.

Sectional Running Times have changed - only that there is a net 0 change for Norwich services, whilst others have been slowed down
 

306024

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
3,946
Location
East Anglia
From a performance point of view GA's new timetable is a disappointment......
If it continues to run at the current levels of punctuality and reliability I won't be disappointed. Clean, on time, get a seat is repeatedly stated as what passengers want, they don't all carry stopwatches.

Engineering allowances for Temporary Speed Restrictions are mandatory in the planning rules. It seems NR have been a victim of their own success in keeping these to a minimum on the GEML in recent times, much better than say 5 years ago. So of course trains can outrun the schedule with fewer TSRs than are allowed for.

Swapping the Chelmsford calls removes Stratford - Chelmsford passengers from the Norwich service. Four trains an hour is hardly poor. At certain times of the day, many try to cram on at Chelmsford and end up standing when there are ample seats on the following train from Braintree.

Has Beaulieu Park been mentioned?
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,943
If it continues to run at the current levels of punctuality and reliability I won't be disappointed. Clean, on time, get a seat is repeatedly stated as what passengers want, they don't all carry stopwatches.

Engineering allowances for Temporary Speed Restrictions are mandatory in the planning rules. It seems NR have been a victim of their own success in keeping these to a minimum on the GEML in recent times, much better than say 5 years ago. So of course trains can outrun the schedule with fewer TSRs than are allowed for.

Swapping the Chelmsford calls removes Stratford - Chelmsford passengers from the Norwich service. Four trains an hour is hardly poor. At certain times of the day, many try to cram on at Chelmsford and end up standing when there are ample seats on the following train from Braintree.

Has Beaulieu Park been mentioned?
Reliability is generally pretty good so that is a positive. But when it goes pear shaped, I'm not seeing how all this extra recovery tine helps. Passengers might not carry stopwatches - I certainly don't, but they do notice when the train is slowing down or ambling along at a slower than normal speed. And the xx:30 to Norwich will have to amble along more than usual from June because the driver has to dissipate close to six minutes of normal running time not to catch up the train in front - cue lots more running at 70 to 80mph on 100mph track. That doesn't feel like an Intercity service! In fact you might as well add the additional stops.
I recall the time when the landslip at Ingatestone on the down line caused single linee working between Shenfield and Margaretting. GA had to introduce an emergency timetable with several trains suspended and the Norwich services taking on additional stops between Shenfield and Colchester but still arriving in Norwich at their original booked time. That illustrates just how much spare time is in the current timetable.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,981
Location
East Anglia
Which actually leads to a downgrade for Chelmsford - Stratford passengers with 5 tph reduced to 4tph. Ideally, both Intercity services per hour should call at Stratford in the off-peak. It's an increasingly popular place to change trains and as a destination.

Back in Intercity days and if the Norwich trains had remained hourly the plan was to have most run fast Ipswich-Stratford. Yes I can tell you first hand of the amount of passengers who alight & board here. It’s often difficult to close doors to depart.
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,943
Back in Intercity days and if the Norwich trains had remained hourly the plan was to have most run fast Ipswich-Stratford. Yes I can tell you first hand of the amount of passengers who alight & board here. It’s often difficult to close doors to depart.
That's no surprise. I'd rather sit on a 745 for comfort reasons and the limited stops compared to an all stops narrow seat 720. Though on a Sunday the 745's are busy enough being hourly and the Chelmsford stop would make these too crowded.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,981
Location
East Anglia
That's no surprise. I'd rather sit on a 745 for comfort reasons and the limited stops compared to an all stops narrow seat 720. Though on a Sunday the 745's are busy enough being hourly and the Chelmsford stop would make these too crowded.

They are so so busy on Sundays when running through. The additionals at 08:25, 15:23 & 16:23 up help but it should really be half-hourly at least 13:00-19:00.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
7,098
Noticed the basic off-peak pattern on the GEML is identical, more or less, to the 2013 timetable which I downloaded from Network Rail - right up to the xx13 Southend and xx38 Colchester being the only mainline services to call at Romford. The survival of the timetable over several years, following a complete stock replacement, is quite remarkable and it's notable that the GEML hasn't introduced permanent cuts to the off-peak service, unlike SWR.

I swear I'd heard on this forum that Braintree was now a shuttle from Witham but obviously that was just a temporary thing.
 

306024

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
3,946
Location
East Anglia
Noticed the basic off-peak pattern on the GEML is identical, more or less, to the 2013 timetable which I downloaded from Network Rail - right up to the xx13 Southend and xx38 Colchester being the only mainline services to call at Romford. The survival of the timetable over several years, following a complete stock replacement, is quite remarkable and it's notable that the GEML hasn't introduced permanent cuts to the off-peak service, unlike SWR.

I swear I'd heard on this forum that Braintree was now a shuttle from Witham but obviously that was just a temporary thing.
It was the December 2010 re-write that produced today's basic pattern, with some minor timing alterations along the way since. It wasn't arrived at by chance, a great deal of detailed discussion took place, and the cooperation of the freight companies was a major contribution.

The GEML timetable is also about connectivity. Given that nearly every branch line has single line sections the connections for the most part are very good.
 

snookertam

Member
Joined
22 Sep 2018
Messages
779
And here in Scotland ;)

Indeed. I don’t think anything could encourage staff in Scotland to work Sundays though. To make it part of the working week would require negotiation with unions, and that’s where the sticking point would be.
 

SJ21

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2017
Messages
67
Location
Exeter
If it continues to run at the current levels of punctuality and reliability I won't be disappointed.
Bang on the money in my books. Only just having moved to Chelmsford and travelling to London daily, the most i have been delayed is 8 minutes. Apart from the 3+2 Seating, the 720's are lovely units, not had an issue with one and the fact they are all identical makes things a lot easier.

The Redundancy in the timetable is perfect, gives time for flexibility and to make up lost time occurred elsewhere. I have certainly been pretty pleased with GA's reliability, a stark change from the Great Western where perfect timekeeping is a dream these days, thanks to the severe amount of issues including TSR's at Newbury that have been in place since January, constant Short Forms and 800's Generator Units packing up so a 9-car unit only has 3 working GU's.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,564
There's no apparent reduction in GE timings to Ipswich Southend Braintree or Clacton, where we know a late running service could run by a 360 could gain at least 6 or 7 minutes when running late between Stratford and Colchester. It looks more like a rebadge exercise - no real improvement in overall journey times at all.
I'm guessing that all these copious amounts of excess running time is what keeps Anglia nearer the top of punctuality charts.
Never mind a 360, I rode on a pair of 317s that made up six minutes to Colchester!

I’m not entirely convinced that’s what ends up happening. On the GN, the Cambridge stopping service was timed to take 40 minutes between King’s Cross and Hitchin in 317 days, though to be fair achieving this required *very* slick work from the driver, 42 minutes was more typical. In May 2018 the same journey was timed to take 52 minutes, and in today’s timetable takes 47 minutes with an extra stop.

In practice, in 317 days the train went as fast as possible, and if it got delayed then so be it. Now you either get held everywhere, or delayed if there’s stuff going on. So you simply lose out *all* of the time instead of *some* of it. And in my experience it’s made no real difference to dependability at all.

It’s rather unfortunate that with trains which have better performance, are longer, and supposedly designed for quick boarding and alighting, that we can’t match let alone beat 1990s timings with good old 317s.

Perhaps I’m just a glass-half-empty person!

Having said all that, there’s not much point in having timings which can’t really be achieved in practice.
It's interesting to compare the 317 era on the GN, or the West Anglia mainline, with the 455s on Southern or SWR. The latter are mind numbingly slow. A late running 455 made up seven minutes between Clapham Junction and Sutton. Imagine how much waiting around there would have been if it had been on time. As you say, I'd rather have a good schedule and accept occasional lateness. There is very little recovery time to Hertford East or Cambridge and yet they almost always run on time.
 
Last edited:

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
7,098
Not very much has changed apart from speeding & tidying up the Intercity timetable & the 08:00up/17:00dn (SX) running fast between Stratford & Ipswich. The Chelmsford stop has been added to the xx:30up/xx:00dn with the alternate half hour only calling Stratford then Colchester in both directions.

Some slight changes to SX early morning Yarmouth services. It is hoped to rehash the regional timetables (possibly getting towards a 7 day timetable) from May 2025.

Looks like there are a few more evening peak services inserted from what I can see, e.g. a 1706 Witham, a 1714 Southminster, and a 1745 Southend Victoria.

Another TOC realising the peak is coming back, which is nice to see.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,981
Location
East Anglia
Looks like there are a few more evening peak services inserted from what I can see, e.g. a 1706 Witham, a 1714 Southminster, and a 1745 Southend Victoria.

Another TOC realising the peak is coming back, which is nice to see.
That's good to hear. It does seem to be much busier during the peak than this time last year.
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,943
Never mind a 360, I rode on a pair of 317s that made up six minutes to Colchester!


It's interesting to compare the 317 era on the GN, or the West Anglia mainline, with the 455s on Southern or SWR. The latter are mind numbingly slow. A late running 455 made up seven minutes between Clapham Junction and Sutton. Imagine how much waiting around there would have been if it had been on time. As you say, I'd rather have a good schedule and accept occasional lateness. There is very little recovery time to Hertford East or Cambridge and yet they almost always run on time.
It might not look like there is any recovery time on West Anglia, but the schedules are pretty slack.
Witness the early morning Cambridge Service with only stops at Tottenham Hale and Audley End. That train ended up becoming an all stations stopper from Bishops Stortford due to earlier cancellations but ended up just a few minutes behind it's non stop schedule having made seven additional stops! Needless to say the driver seemed pretty determined to arrive with minimum delay and the unit was driven in the old fashioned way rather than plodding around as they usually do when on tine. The standard schedule for an all stations stopper between Bishops Stortford and Shelford is 30 mins - but achieved in 25.5 min!. The standard schedule for Bishops Stortford to Shelford (pass) with a semi fast stopping at Audley End and Whittlesford Parkway is 24 min with 1.5 min of allowances - easy meat for a 720.
 
Last edited:

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,564
It might not look like there is any recovery time on West Anglia, but the schedules are pretty slack.
Witness the early morning Cambridge Service with only stops at Tottenham Hale and Audley End. That train ended up becoming an all stations stopper from Bishops Stortford due to earlier cancellations but ended up just a few minutes behind it's non stop schedule having made seven additional stops! Needless to say the driver seemed pretty determined to arrive with minimum delay and the unit was driven in the old fashioned way rather than plodding around as they usually do when on tine. The standard schedule for an all stations stopper between Bishops Stortford and Shelford is 30 mins - but achieved in 25.5 min!. The standard schedule for Bishops Stortford to Shelford (pass) with a semi fast stopping at Audley End and Whittlesford Parkway is 24 min with 1.5 min of allowances - easy meat for a 720.
I was referring to when they were worked by class 317s. They had to be worked pretty hard to keep time on the standard off peak schedules. There were many times when I wondered if the train was actually going to stop in time. There was usually a bit of recovery at Bishop's Stortford for Cambridge trains and Broxbourne for Hertford trains but other than that they were constantly on the move with short station dwells. The schedules have not changed since so the 720s ought to be able to manage easily. The contra peak 0803/0833 Cambridge trains have lots of slack.

As for the run to Ipswich, the stench off the brakes was incredible. Never had a run like it before or since. Off the top of my head, it was booked to depart at 1818 but actually left at 1824. It was held outside Colchester having caught up with the 1812 departure which was running on time!
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,943
I was referring to when they were worked by class 317s. They had to be worked pretty hard to keep time on the standard off peak schedules. There were many times when I wondered if the train was actually going to stop in time. There was usually a bit of recovery at Bishop's Stortford for Cambridge trains and Broxbourne for Hertford trains but other than that they were constantly on the move with short station dwells. The schedules have not changed since so the 720s ought to be able to manage easily. The contra peak 0803/0833 Cambridge trains have lots of slack.

As for the run to Ipswich, the stench off the brakes was incredible. Never had a run like it before or since. Off the top of my head, it was booked to depart at 1818 but actually left at 1824. It was held outside Colchester having caught up with the 1812 departure which was running on time!
Those were the days!! The 0803/0833 are too tightly timed behind the stopping Cambridge Service. So they have additional pathing time to allow for the fact they catch the stopper before it leaves Cheshunt. Curiously the stopper isn't looped at Broxbourne, so more pathing is added until Harlow Town where the stopper is finally looped. It's all very leisurely slowing to a crawl in places. Looping the stopper at Broxbourne would seem to be a better idea but that looks like it would require a slow down before Shepreth Jn due to trains crossing to/from Royston. Seems priority is given to Thameslink / GN. Again with so much pathing time, why not add some additional stops?
 

Alfie1014

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2012
Messages
1,126
Location
Essex
Looks like there are a few more evening peak services inserted from what I can see, e.g. a 1706 Witham, a 1714 Southminster, and a 1745 Southend Victoria.

Another TOC realising the peak is coming back, which is nice to see.
Yep up to 17 tph in the evening high peak hour (mirroring that already operating in the morning peak) compared to 20 pre COVID. The pattern on the main line is also better in my view with most evening peak Clacton services fast Stratford to Chelmsford. Walton on the Naze has its through trains to London restored with a portion off of the 16:14 Liv St - Clacton detached at Colchester restoring the extra 17:26 Col to Walton (which used to run pre COVID) and an 08:01 Walton to Liv St.

The moving of the 17:50 Liv St to Norwich is logical not least as it puts it on pattern and shortens the connectional times into the Walton, Harwich, East Suffolk branches and the Ips to Cambs local. That said it does rather cement the loss of one peak Norwich train (the former 18:10) which combined with the loss of the 06:48 up means that even with the greater capacity of the STADLER trains the number of seats over the whole peak is barely up on what the cl.90s and MkIIIs provided. This is especially marked in the morning peak with one service operated as 11 x 755 and having the best part of 200 seats fewer than a 12 car IC/SX unit.
 

Adrian1980uk

Member
Joined
24 May 2016
Messages
494
Yep up to 17 tph in the evening high peak hour (mirroring that already operating in the morning peak) compared to 20 pre COVID. The pattern on the main line is also better in my view with most evening peak Clacton services fast Stratford to Chelmsford. Walton on the Naze has its through trains to London restored with a portion off of the 16:14 Liv St - Clacton detached at Colchester restoring the extra 17:26 Col to Walton (which used to run pre COVID) and an 08:01 Walton to Liv St.

The moving of the 17:50 Liv St to Norwich is logical not least as it puts it on pattern and shortens the connectional times into the Walton, Harwich, East Suffolk branches and the Ips to Cambs local. That said it does rather cement the loss of one peak Norwich train (the former 18:10) which combined with the loss of the 06:48 up means that even with the greater capacity of the STADLER trains the number of seats over the whole peak is barely up on what the cl.90s and MkIIIs provided. This is especially marked in the morning peak with one service operated as 11 x 755 and having the best part of 200 seats fewer than a 12 car IC/SX unit.

The movement of the 17:50 to 18:00 is logical and truth be told, with flexible working embedded, commuters are generally leaving offices earlier than before the pandemic and I guess working longer on their WFH days. More likely if an extra peak was to return, I suggest it would be along the lines 17:00, 17:20, 17:40, 18:00. This of course won't happen unless something dramatically changes as there are no spare 745s anyway, why would GA give themselves that nightmare unless there was a large surge in passenger numbers and no other option.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,245
The movement of the 17:50 to 18:00 is logical and truth be told, with flexible working embedded, commuters are generally leaving offices earlier than before the pandemic and I guess working longer on their WFH days. More likely if an extra peak was to return, I suggest it would be along the lines 17:00, 17:20, 17:40, 18:00. This of course won't happen unless something dramatically changes as there are no spare 745s anyway, why would GA give themselves that nightmare unless there was a large surge in passenger numbers and no other option.

I dunno, I like to make my office days long but maybe I'm weird. At least I don't commute five days a week, every week to the office anymore.
 

paulmch

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
97
Again with so much pathing time, why not add some additional stops?

From a purely selfish point of view I'd love for the few XX:21 departures from Stansted Airport towards Birmingham to have the stop at Audley End reinstated. Trundling along at 35mph because you'd be nearly 10 minutes ahead of schedule otherwise is really boring, and not the best advert for the railway for people just arriving in the UK.
 

mangyiscute

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2021
Messages
1,302
Location
Reading
There are plenty of situations where limited stop trains have lots of pathing time instead of stopping at a station, and it always confuses me. As far as I can tell, there are 3 possible reasons to do this:
1) Fewer stops suggest a faster journey to someone booking the train, meaning the journey is more attractive (especially true for a non-stop journey)
2) Lots of potential catch up time if the train was previously delayed
3) The train is usually full or close to full so stopping at these additional stations would lead to overcrowding, its better for people at these stations to use other services.
In many cases though, I don't think any of these points justify skipping stops, and it is very infuriating.
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,943
From a purely selfish point of view I'd love for the few XX:21 departures from Stansted Airport towards Birmingham to have the stop at Audley End reinstated. Trundling along at 35mph because you'd be nearly 10 minutes ahead of schedule otherwise is really boring, and not the best advert for the railway for people just arriving in the UK.
It makes sense to include the stop unless there is a political reason why the stop has been omitted. Of course each stop consumes more energy starting the train and additional wear on brakes. I guess that adds up over the year. Then again, slowing down for yellow and red signals following trains ahead probably exacerbates the issue.
Pathing issues seem to be an issue for West Anglia due to a lack of capacity and too many flat junctions. If you optimise capacity at Hackney downs, copper mill Jn, Broxbourne and Stansted south/ north you end up with a situation where trains need to traverse Shepreth Jn at the same time as GN/TL. And as it appears ECML is the priority, then it's trains get the priority over the Jn, meaning GA and XC have to wait. Cambridge station is also a bottleneck - not enough tracks or platforms and an unconventional layout that seems to reduce the flow of terminating and through trains. The other alternative is to speed up GA and XC to so they can get to Shepreth earlier ahead of the current TL/ GN paths. Or similarly speed up GN/TL between Hitchin and Shepreth.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,942
I recall the time when the landslip at Ingatestone on the down line caused single linee working between Shenfield and Margaretting. GA had to introduce an emergency timetable with several trains suspended and the Norwich services taking on additional stops between Shenfield and Colchester but still arriving in Norwich at their original booked time. That illustrates just how much spare time is in the current timetable.
I'm not convinced about them arriving in Norwich on time despite the Bi-Directional Running, additionally there is [6] between Liverpool Street and Norwich which covered some but not all of that.

They are so so busy on Sundays when running through. The additionals at 08:25, 15:23 & 16:23 up help but it should really be half-hourly at least 13:00-19:00.
:E so you will be giving up your Sundays to work them will you :E

Sectional Running Times have changed - only that there is a net 0 change for Norwich services, whilst others have been slowed down
These are Class 745 sechedules that were changed a couploe of years ago and have been running on the faster schedules (compared to Mark IIIs and 90s already) so would not be affected by an Class 720 timing changes (different Rolling Stock)

If it continues to run at the current levels of punctuality and reliability I won't be disappointed. Clean, on time, get a seat is repeatedly stated as what passengers want, they don't all carry stopwatches.
Would be a bit sad if they did, mind you it would be interesting how many different wildly times planners would get from just one train.
Engineering allowances for Temporary Speed Restrictions are mandatory in the planning rules. It seems NR have been a victim of their own success in keeping these to a minimum on the GEML in recent times, much better than say 5 years ago. So of course trains can outrun the schedule with fewer TSRs than are allowed for.
But at the expense it seems of a lot of buses at weekends.

Swapping the Chelmsford calls removes Stratford - Chelmsford passengers from the Norwich service. Four trains an hour is hardly poor. At certain times of the day, many try to cram on at Chelmsford and end up standing when there are ample seats on the following train from Braintree.
Is going to be annoying for Colchester to Chelmsford journeys, looks like a 30 minute gap (nearly) in service in the off peak for that journey.
Has Beaulieu Park been mentioned?
Doesn't look like it, but a sore point with all the blocks for it. Hopefully will be done soon. However why does it need to be a three platform station? Must cause more blocks.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,981
Location
East Anglia
It's actually more convenient for some people to work Sunday and have a day off in the week..

I much prefer to be off during the week. Always enjoy working Bank Holidays too so to take a day off when I like rather than when the world & his uncle are off.
 
Joined
30 Oct 2019
Messages
114
Location
GEML
These are Class 745 sechedules that were changed a couploe of years ago and have been running on the faster schedules (compared to Mark IIIs and 90s already) so would not be affected by an Class 720 timing changes (different Rolling Stock)
Class 720, 755-E and 745 timings are the same - they have been slightly altered e.g. - Liv St to Stratford is 6½ vs 7 for all of the new trains now.

Doesn't look like it, but a sore point with all the blocks for it. Hopefully will be done soon. However why does it need to be a three platform station? Must cause more blocks.
I'll go ahead and mention it now! Monday - Saturday a selection of services have 2 minutes extra waiting at either Witham or Chelmsford, presumably in preparation for a future Beaulieu Park stop. Surprisingly off-peak, only the Ipswich to Liv St stoppers have the extra wait time giving 1tph initially. Nothing yet on Sunday.

When is Beaulieu Park expected to open? I'll be very shocked if it's before December 2024!
 

Top