Far from it. I compared a similar museum in your own city which charges far far more for an annual ticket than the LTM does.
Along the road from me, the RRS Discovery only offers an annual ticket at £17 - and if you really wanted to save cash, in January, you could have entry with a lottery ticket, so a couple of quid max.
Your "cutting off your nose" because they sell an annual ticket is frankly bizarre.
Then to claim that you're exuded when that's a personal choice is the one that's a bit odd.
Precisely. There's an optional fee in some of these places for additional exhibits too.
One of the best moves the then Labour government made, opening up a huge range of museums to everyone regardless of income.
A bit like the Titanic one in Belfast then.The Museum is awful wouldn't waste your money.
That looks better The depot open days at Acton are great ,well worth a visit .A bit like the Titanic one in Belfast then.
I'm not so sure! This topic has been read by 423 individual members. It's also been read 1560 times (most of our readers are non-members)Indeed it does: (1) Not many are interested in Railtours and Preservation as a topic to peruse...
How much do you think the respective costs would be, in order to be a good deal, a fair option and also break even?(2) This is a Transport Forum and the likelihood that many would pay any amount to see something without appreciating that they’ve been conned into paying for 12 months access whether they want to or not! If the deal is so good, why remove the single entry option?
My last visit was before that. I do remember going, but I was only about 11 on my last visit, so I do intend to go again at some point.Far from it - I went 10-15 years ago so that box is ticked....
I went to the Glasgow Riverside museum. It was very disappointing.
I really don't understand this.
Many of the places I have visited over the past ten years or more have been doing this. I think I first encountered it at the "Eden Project" at least ten years ago, though I have in mind that the Shakespeare properties in Stratford-upon-Avon were doing it before that.
The only difference is the way some are promoted. The London Transport Museum simply advertises their tickets as an "Annual Pass". When I first encountered the feature at the Eden Project I bought a day ticket, but in small print, almost as an afterthought, it said something like "and don't forget: you can revisit the Eden Project as many times as you like in the next twelve months." As it happens it was of little benefit to me as I live 300 miles from the Eden Project. But it would not have deterred me from visiting if the only ticket on offer was a reasonably priced "annual pass."
That looks better The depot open days at Acton are great ,well worth a visit .
That's the point.It probably bumps up the price of a single entry by 3 quid tops, and with the queues of tourists for the 10 am opening when I was cutting past, there's plenty tourists not put off by that.
Just looked at The Shard viewing gallery prices. Ouch.It's not like say comparing the Shard Vs Skygarden. That IS a case where you can make a comparison between 2 similar tourist attractions and complain about the price
The new Glasgow museum is not a patch on the old one that was at Kelvingrove..The 'street' is a pale imitation, The car Showroom is no longer there, the maritime sections is a feeble replacement where now it is like looking at the conveyor belt from the generation game instead of a wander around the cabinets of models that you could view from both sides.Most i understand are in store as there wasnt the room to accommodate them. Motor Cycles and Cars halfway up walls. I would love to get hold of the numpty who thought he had done improvements and nail him to the wall. Free??? they should pay you to go in. My eyes still acheBut what is a ‘normal’ tourist attraction? Instead of the museum I first went to the Wellcome Foundation who had two interesting exhibitions, and The Lookout at 8 Bishopsgate as the sun was shining and the views of the 50th floor quite breathtaking. I’d previously gone to the Postal Museum which was £14.50 (and incidentally, annual) but the first 2 were free.
Of course there was a queue like an execution at Toussauds, but then I stopped looking at their pricing when I couldn’t get a joint ticket for the Planetarium! So it’s what you feel it’a worth - Glasgow’s Transport Museum is free to all visitors But certainly worth a contribution - Covent Garden to my mind isn’t - especially as the NRM also don’t charge. Their loss, I’m afraid.
Oh agreed - whoever thought moving the car showroom so all you can really see is the underside of the platform that is nailed to the wall… but at least the Subway exhibits can be appreciated. Still, try a visit to the Nitshill facility (also Free) by appointment- some lovely signage there !The new Glasgow museum is not a patch on the old one that was at Kelvingrove.
I went to the Glasgow Riverside museum. It was very disappointing. The London transport museum was much better.
London Transport Museum (LTM) has been located in the historic, grade II listed flower market building in Covent Garden since 1980. Its location and iconic building are key contributors to success. Post coronavirus pandemic, demand has continued to grow. For the last two years LTM has been London’s third fastest recovering attraction in the post pandemic market.
However, footfall and income at LTM is now capped by space and capacity constraints. LTM is at capacity at peak times and queues stretch across the Piazza and venue hire is sold out across the year on term time Tuesdays and Wednesdays.
This paper considers potential future proposals for development of the Covent Garden site.
Which would make sense if the price wasn’t comparable with single-admission prices at similarly funded organisations.It might be common but some people are sensible and live on a budget.
It’s not cutting your nose off, it’s living within your means.
Have you even read this thread?It might be common but some people are sensible and live on a budget.
It’s not cutting your nose off, it’s living within your means.
It absolutely is a cost of living issue, these museums need to have as broad appeal as possible.Have you even read this thread?
It's referring to a entry ticket priced similar to an equivalent tourist attraction for single entry. The OP has avoided answering whether they would have gone in were it labelled as single entry for the same price.
In this instance where it seems the individual travelled hundreds of miles, likely adding significant travel and accommodation costs then the museum would have been a small fraction of the cost
This is not a cost of living issue.
If you wish to be brainwashed that 365 days access is ‘better value’ than paying for 1, you have to ask why has this developed into an increase in cost and removal of choice? If the ‘deal’ was that good why not offer annual access in addition to a daily rate as an option rather than remove the choice?
Ok - it is about the cost of entry. That is a lot easier to debate than the free pass!I just love how the ‘justifiers’ feel that the annual pass is the same price as the (previous) walk up. I’m on a limited budget and have to go where I get best value. I have no need for an ‘annual’ anything and £25 is way too much. Locals get in for £18.50 which I suggest is at the higher end of access cost but just about do-able.
Of course nobody’s mentioned that EVEN IF you pay this amount you still have to get a free ‘timed ticket’ IF there is space available - so even if you don’t baulk at £24.50 walk up, you still might not get in. Yes, that is indeed a bargain (not!).
If single entry tickets for walk up were available at £18 that’s reasonable - £7 more isn’t.
The argument is £XX.XX admission is rather expensive, BUT I’ve got unrestricted access for a whole year, so it’s probably better value - so I’ll accept it in good faith. You then find most lose their ticket and don’t go back….Why is being offered free returns for a year being “brainwashed”
It is the same cost as one entry. Obviously your second entry comes at a lower price and so on.The argument is £XX.XX admission is rather expensive, BUT I’ve got unrestricted access for a whole year, so it’s probably better value - so I’ll accept it in good faith. You then find most lose their ticket and don’t go back….
The argument is £XX.XX admission is rather expensive, BUT I’ve got unrestricted access for a whole year, so it’s probably better value - so I’ll accept it in good faith. You then find most lose their ticket and don’t go back….
Really? On what basis?The Museum is awful wouldn't waste your money.
I posted the facts regarding prices and dates earlier in this thread and you ignored my post completely.I just love how the ‘justifiers’ feel that the annual pass is the same price as the (previous) walk up. I’m on a limited budget and have to go where I get best value. I have no need for an ‘annual’ anything and £25 is way too much. Locals get in for £18.50 which I suggest is at the higher end of access cost but just about do-able.
If it was after 20 October 2010 then the ticket you got last time was also valid for a year.
It was combined with a planned price increase from £10 to £13.50 that was going to happen anyway.
Really? On what basis?
It has buses, trains and tubes. What more should It have?
I posted the facts regarding prices and dates earlier in this thread and you ignored my post completely.
I have visited both thanks. It is a fantastic museum. Interesting cross section of exhibits, good range of stories etc.A much better layout, co-ordination, and a place where you can actually view the items.
Putting the cars up on a mantelpiece shows how bad it is.
If you've never visited the old one(s), you wouldn't know how bad it is.