• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Pilot Engines

Irascible

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2020
Messages
2,014
Location
Dyfneint
If the banker was coupled to the rear of an unfitted train, some care would need to have been taken to ensure there wasn't a snatch and a broken coupling. Did this means the lion's share of the traction would have had to come from the banker I wonder?

I was about to bring that up, but no, they'd just have to make sure they unloaded the section they were managing carefully. Not least so they didn't get a rocket from the guard as his van snatched...

I'd think even now they have to be a bit careful not to put the train engine in wheelslip.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,115
In answer to the question in another post about which way banking engines faced, in the Lickey case (and presumably other steep inclines) it was to keep the firebox at the lower end of the locomotive. Apparently there was a risk with some locomotive types that the water level would fall too low if the firebox was at the uphill end.
That doesn't work on the 1 in 36 of Dainton, where this gradient up to the top from Newton Abbot is immediately followed by the same down the other side to Totnes. It was actually a significant issue for the main train loco, let alone the pilot (who of course knew it all well), and was what led to bans on both the Britannias and West Country Pacifics, with long boilers. Even a King dropped water level in the glass several inches going over the top - you can work it out for yourself.

One reason for no catch points on a gradient is the likelihood, or experience, of the train stalling on the hill - if it does so and the vehicles are actually over a catch point, with just a little bit of recoil you can be dans la merde in very short order. Let alone preventing having to back down again.

If the banker was coupled to the rear of an unfitted train, some care would need to have been taken to ensure there wasn't a snatch and a broken coupling. Did this means the lion's share of the traction would have had to come from the banker I wonder?
Regarding power from back in the train, this was a significant issue when the USA started to move to "distributed power" for mainstream haulage, as opposed to just pushing up a hill, with mid-train locos instead of them all at the front. When you have power from both ends here is a mid-point where the couplings change from tension (pulled from the front) to compression (pushed from the back). This moves back and forth along the train as relative speed, power and gradient change, and at first there were a whole range of broken couplings (and some railroads actually gave up) until the dynamic forces were understood and tamed. It took quite some years.

Lion's share from the banker? Wonderful story, again from the USA, in their early diesel days. There was still a large steam banker on a major gradient, but it was noticed that with the new GM diesels on the front progress was not as expected. Senior officials came down to examine, and were riding in the diesel cab when they stopped to add the banker, likely half a mile behind. On to the hill, and things were indeed slow as they growled up. The chief Road Foreman, a grumpy old so-and-so, kept looking back as the train wound round the curves. Only doing walking pace, he dropped out onto the ballast on the outside of a curve. Another train length passed, and then there was suddenly action from the back - steam and smoke now high in the sky, and a notable pick up in speed. Stopped at the summit, he walked forward again, with a range of "they'll never take it easy with diesels on the front again" comments"
 
Last edited:

Whisky Papa

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
396
...
Lion's share from the banker? Wonderful story, again from the USA, in their early diesel days. There was still a large steam banker on a major gradient, but it was noticed that with the new GM diesels on the front progress was not as expected. Senior officials came down to examine, and were riding in the diesel cab when they stopped to add the banker, likely half a mile behind. On to the hill, and things were indeed slow as they growled up. The chief Road Foreman, a grumpy old so-and-so, kept looking back as the train wound round the curves. Only doing walking pace, he dropped out onto the ballast on the outside of a curve. Another train length passed, and then there was suddenly action from the back - steam and smoke now high in the sky, and a notable pick up in speed. Stopped at the summit, he walked forward again, with a range of "they'll never take it easy with diesels on the front again" comments"
That reminds me of a short story I read in the Manchester Evening News as a teenager. I don't know whether it was entirely fictional or based on actual events - it sounds vaguely plausible but I have my doubts.

It revolved around a Great Central (or perhaps LNER?) driver and fireman who became fed up with the lack of effort put in by one of the regular banking crews through the old Woodhead tunnel. On one occasion, the fireman was surprised to see his driver bring a large paper parcel to work with him which he stored carefully on the footplate. Once they had ascertained it was indeed the lazy banking crew who would be pushing them, when they had entered the tunnel the driver threw the parcel into the firebox and warned his fireman not to breathe for a few seconds. There was a foul stench and thick black smoke - even by Woodhead's standards - and the fireman was left wondering what was going on. When they got clear of the tunnel the driver gleefully explained it had been a 'present' for the banking crew, consisting of a large amount of offal from a local butcher.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
5,792
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
That reminds me of a short story I read in the Manchester Evening News as a teenager. I don't know whether it was entirely fictional or based on actual events - it sounds vaguely plausible but I have my doubts.

It revolved around a Great Central (or perhaps LNER?) driver and fireman who became fed up with the lack of effort put in by one of the regular banking crews through the old Woodhead tunnel. On one occasion, the fireman was surprised to see his driver bring a large paper parcel to work with him which he stored carefully on the footplate. Once they had ascertained it was indeed the lazy banking crew who would be pushing them, when they had entered the tunnel the driver threw the parcel into the firebox and warned his fireman not to breathe for a few seconds. There was a foul stench and thick black smoke - even by Woodhead's standards - and the fireman was left wondering what was going on. When they got clear of the tunnel the driver gleefully explained it had been a 'present' for the banking crew, consisting of a large amount of offal from a local butcher.
Thirty years ago, I heard a similar tale from a couple of old-hand Rose Grove drivers who had ended-up at Skipton through a series of redundancy moves via Blackburn and Bury. Apparently, when their lazy banking crew were on duty on the Copy Pit line, the crew on the train engine would p**s on the shovel and throw it into the fire on entering Towneley Tunnel on the Down, or Kitson Wood Tunnel on the Up. That usually ensured an increase in effort from the rear end!
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,151
One reason for no catch points on a gradient is the likelihood, or experience, of the train stalling on the hill - if it does so and the vehicles are actually over a catch point, with just a little bit of recoil you can be dans la merde in very short order. Let alone preventing having to back down again.
Presumably that's why the ascent out of Weymouth to the Bincombe tunnel had a sand drag instead? How common was that?
 

robert thomas

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2019
Messages
274
Location
Neath
Thirty years ago, I heard a similar tale from a couple of old-hand Rose Grove drivers who had ended-up at Skipton through a series of redundancy moves via Blackburn and Bury. Apparently, when their lazy banking crew were on duty on the Copy Pit line, the crew on the train engine would p**s on the shovel and throw it into the fire on entering Towneley Tunnel on the Down, or Kitson Wood Tunnel on the Up. That usually ensured an increase in effort from the rear end!
I've heard the same story about Llangyfelach tunnel on the Swansea District line
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,436
I've heard the same story about Llangyfelach tunnel on the Swansea District line
And a similar story involving Bolton ...


I think it's something that may (or may not!) have happened somewhere and was adopted and adapted by others.
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,151
Thirty years ago, I heard a similar tale from a couple of old-hand Rose Grove drivers who had ended-up at Skipton through a series of redundancy moves via Blackburn and Bury. Apparently, when their lazy banking crew were on duty on the Copy Pit line, the crew on the train engine would p**s on the shovel and throw it into the fire on entering Towneley Tunnel on the Down, or Kitson Wood Tunnel on the Up. That usually ensured an increase in effort from the rear end!
Not sure I believe that tale - the small amount of urine on the shovel would be incredibly diluted (and burnt) by the smoke from the fire. It would never be noticed. Would need something much more noxious, like pig or chicken manure
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
5,792
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Not sure I believe that tale - the small amount of urine on the shovel would be incredibly diluted (and burnt) by the smoke from the fire. It would never be noticed. Would need something much more noxious, like pig or chicken manure
Perhaps it was something else which is known for leaving a shovel hurriedly? <D
 

Andy873

Member
Joined
23 Mar 2017
Messages
965
The final 5 seconds of this video, shows the steel coil train pulling away from the not coupled
Lovely video, thanks!

Thirty years ago, I heard a similar tale from a couple of old-hand Rose Grove drivers who had ended-up at Skipton through a series of redundancy moves via Blackburn and Bury. Apparently, when their lazy banking crew were on duty on the Copy Pit line, the crew on the train engine would p**s on the shovel and throw it into the fire on entering Towneley Tunnel on the Down, or Kitson Wood Tunnel on the Up. That usually ensured an increase in effort from the rear end!
Some great stories coming out here, and we've all worked with someone who doesn't pull their own weight.

Back onto the banking engines - I watched (some time ago) a video of steam in Lancashire before 1968. It shows an unloved 8F with about eight mineral wagons trying to get up a bank without a banking engine.

The driver tried four times to get up the bank, each time staling. Every time he took the train back down the bank to try again, but he couldn't get all the way down because of a catch point. In the end, he had to split the train and come back for the rest. Normally I think it would have been expected to be able to climb the bank with so few wagons, but this was towards the end of steam and the 8F was clearly in need of some maintenance which wasn't going to happen.
 

52290

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2015
Messages
553
Here's a photo I took in the early 1970's at Vordenberg Market on the Erzgebirg rack railway.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20240408_114427514~2.jpg
    PXL_20240408_114427514~2.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 20
Joined
28 Nov 2021
Messages
138
Location
Leith
On the question of whether bankers on the Lickey Incline were coupled to the train: for steam examples see:
. The sequences at 0:20 and 4:20 show that they weren't coupled to the train, and at 8:10 that they weren't coupled to each other either.

One thing I've never understood: how did the signalman at Blackwell know how many bankers to expect? He had to know they'd all passed his box before allowing another train into the block immediately below Blackwell. Did this depend on the banker, or the last banker of those on one train, showing a tail lamp (in addition to that on the train)?

On catchpoints (responding to https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/pilot-engines.264968/post-6714082): at 6:59 in
, the signalling diagram shows what I think are catch points about halfway up the bank, above the intermediate block signal. If I'm understanding the diagram correctly, they would have prevented any runaway on the upper half of the bank from running back into a following train.

At 2:40 in the Class 37 video (above, https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/pilot-engines.264968/post-6716097) you see a facing crossover which IIRC was installed when Bromsgrove station was reduced to a single platform on the up side. IIRC, catch points were installed on the up line just above this. I remember a non-standard diesel (possibly Kestrel on a test run?) running light engine but coming to halt just above the catch points. There was then a good deal of cursing and swearing as assorted railwaymen set about closing the points to allow a banker to rescue the failure.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,162
Location
Cambridge, UK
In the US, but I think this might be almost the ultimate in banking and steam-age 'distributed power':

Train-Rollins-Pass-860.jpg


The photo is from the early 1920s, linked from an article in the US Saturday Evening Post about Rollins Pass in Colorado (photo courtesy of B. Travis Wright).

A 'temporary' standard gauge line was opened over the pass in 1905 (with a summit at 11,660 feet) to complete a direct route to the west out of Denver. With long 4% gradients and needing rotary snow ploughs to keep it open for 9 months of the year, a typical loaded train of 50 bogie wagons needed five 2-6-6-0 Mallet banking engines in addition to the 2-8-0 on the front - so six engine crews to get about 50 loaded bogie wagons over the pass... a phenomenally expensive and difficult line to operate.

Nobody was sorry to see it go when it was replaced by the current Moffat Tunnel route in 1928.
 
Last edited:

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,442
Location
SW London
One thing I've never understood: how did the signalman at Blackwell know how many bankers to expect? He had to know they'd all passed his box before allowing another train into the block immediately below Blackwell. Did this depend on the banker, or the last banker of those on one train, showing a tail lamp (in addition to that on the train)?
In the video all bankers seemed to display a tail lamp, although it looks like they were in different positions. See at 8:12, the further banker (the one that would have been next to the rear of the train) appears to have the lamp in a higher position than the nearer (rear) banker, whilst in all shots the train has the tail lamp on the kleft and the bankers have them on the right.
I read (not sure whether it was this thread or another now) that, at least at some boxes, not only was there a special bell code to warn the next box there was a banker, but there were different bell codes to indicate the number of banking engines to expect.
 

Andy873

Member
Joined
23 Mar 2017
Messages
965
On the question of whether bankers on the Lickey Incline were coupled to the train: for steam examples see:
. The sequences at 0:20 and 4:20 show that they weren't coupled to the train, and at 8:10 that they weren't coupled to each other either.

One thing I've never understood: how did the signalman at Blackwell know how many bankers to expect? He had to know they'd all passed his box before allowing another train into the block immediately below Blackwell. Did this depend on the banker, or the last banker of those on one train, showing a tail lamp (in addition to that on the train)?

On catchpoints (responding to https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/pilot-engines.264968/post-6714082): at 6:59 in
, the signalling diagram shows what I think are catch points about halfway up the bank, above the intermediate block signal. If I'm understanding the diagram correctly, they would have prevented any runaway on the upper half of the bank from running back into a following train.

At 2:40 in the Class 37 video (above, https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/pilot-engines.264968/post-6716097) you see a facing crossover which IIRC was installed when Bromsgrove station was reduced to a single platform on the up side. IIRC, catch points were installed on the up line just above this. I remember a non-standard diesel (possibly Kestrel on a test run?) running light engine but coming to halt just above the catch points. There was then a good deal of cursing and swearing as assorted railwaymen set about closing the points to allow a banker to rescue the failure.
A fascinating and informative video - we are very lucky videos like this one are available to watch.

In the US, but I think this might be almost the ultimate in banking and steam-age 'distributed power'
A vey beautiful and scenic photo, thanks.

How common is banking today? and what other notorious inclines does anyone know about? The Baxenden bank between Accrington and Bury was I think a 1 in 38.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,436
A fascinating and informative video - we are very lucky videos like this one are available to watch.


A vey beautiful and scenic photo, thanks.

How common is banking today? and what other notorious inclines does anyone know about? The Baxenden bank between Accrington and Bury was I think a 1 in 38.
Banking was quite a common thing - although the likes of Shap, Beattock and Lickey are well-known there were dozens of other locations where it happened.

I've found some details from the Birmingham/Shrewsbury districts in the early 1960s which I'll post when I have time.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,162
Location
Cambridge, UK
How common is banking today?
AFAIK - not very common in the UK nowadays, even the Lickey banking is now done on an 'as required' basis rather than a banker being stationed there full time. I think the heavy biomass trains to Drax are banked out of the port (Seaforth?) due to the combination of gradient and curvature (which increases the rolling resistance), and the same for the heavy stone trains for a short distance out of Merehead. There is doubtless some other ad-hoc banking done at times.

But the superior low-speed tractive effort and better wheelslip control of electric and diesel traction (and declining freight traffic) consigned many steam-age banking operations to history, at least on a regular basis - along with the loco sheds and jobs associated with them.

and what other notorious inclines does anyone know about? The Baxenden bank between Accrington and Bury was I think a 1 in 38.
After the Lickey, the South Devon banks between Newton Abbott and Plymouth (Dainton, Rattery and Hemerdon) are some of the worst mainline inclines in the UK because they are both steep (maximum of 1 in 36) and twisty. Long gone, but the line in north Devon between Barnstaple and Ilfracombe had 3 miles of 1 in 36 out of Ilfracombe and 6 miles of up to 1 in 40 northbound from Braunton. The Mersey Railway tunnel has 1 in 27 gradients. The Thameslink core has a section at 1 in 29. The long closed Hopton Incline on the Cromford and High Peak Railway was the steepest stretch of standard gauge adhesion-worked railway in the UK at 1 in 14.

The metre-gauge Saint-Gervais–Vallorcine railway in France has a 2km section with a 9% (1 in 11) gradient, I think the steepest adhesion-worked regular 'heavy' railway in the world (I travelled on it years ago, when you got a drivers-eye view traveling at the front of the EMU - it seemed unbelievably steep for adhesion working!). That's over three times steeper than the Lickey!

This is the Wikipedia 'List of steepest gradients on adhesion railways'
 
Last edited:

Sun Chariot

Established Member
Joined
16 Mar 2009
Messages
1,406
Location
2 miles and 50 years away from the Longmoor Milita
How common is banking today? and what other notorious inclines does anyone know about? The Baxenden bank between Accrington and Bury was I think a 1 in 38
If you open YouTube and search Lickey banking and Lickey Incline, you'll find a variety of video footage, old and current trains, with banking locomotive.

If you also search Folkestone Harbour branch, then you'll find some fabulous footage of the fearsome 1 in 30 line from the old station up to Folkestone Junction.
I was fortunate to see two steam-hauled specials tackle that bank, in early 2009 (just prior to the line's closure). The diesel banker was working flat-out, each time. :)
 

Rescars

Member
Joined
25 May 2021
Messages
1,176
Location
Surrey
Banking was quite a common thing - although the likes of Shap, Beattock and Lickey are well-known there were dozens of other locations where it happened.

I've found some details from the Birmingham/Shrewsbury districts in the early 1960s which I'll post when I have time.
There were some unusual situations where banking assistance was required on a one-off basis - the movement of out-of-gauge loads, for example. I also recall tales of steam being used to bank emus on the Caterham and Tattenham Corner branches during the Big Freeze of 1963, but sadly I have no supporting evidence. Others may know more about this.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,162
Location
Cambridge, UK
A vey beautiful and scenic photo, thanks.
Also in North America:

I'll quote a short passage from the April 2004 'Mountain Railroads' issue of Trains magazine, from the 'Old Men of the Mountain' article by Blair E. Kooistra. It's about taking a westbound 14,000+ ton coal train up the twisty 2.2% gradient to the summit of Rogers Pass in Western Canada in 1983, after adding a manned six unit 'pusher' set of EMD SD40-2 diesels into the train in addition to the six locos already powering it. That's a total of 36,000hp and nearly a million lbs/4400 kN of tractive effort.
High above the Beaver Valley, train No. 809-374-20 vaults onto Stoney Creek bridge. The standard four SD40-2s are up front, followed by 47 cars and two more SDs controlled from the head-end through the blue "robot" car: Thirty-four more cars to the rear, Cliff Inkster's pusher almost fills out the 484-foot-long bridge, cut in 29 cars ahead of CPR's trademark yellow "van" on the rear of the 110-car, 14,164-ton train.

Until the export coal boom of the early 1970s, CPR had never regularly massed so many locomotives on a single train. Now, three or four times a day, 12 SD40-2s tug these enormous trains out of the Beaver Valley. The cost of these pushers is enormous.
(Pusher or Helper = banking engine, Yellow 'van' = caboose, CPR = Canadian Pacific Railway)

To imagine UK equivalent, maybe take three 'jumbo' 4000+ tonne stone trains, put four cl. 59's on each one and couple all three trains together - then run it over a steeper version of Shap, Beattock or the S & C etc. :D.

The operating cost of the pushers and the limitations it imposed on line capacity led to CPR spending a lot of money in the 1980s on a new, additional 'low-grade' line over the pass including a 9.1 mile tunnel (the longest rail tunnel on the NA continent), reducing the westbound gradient to 1% and banishing the manned pushers to history. Today the equivalent coal trains commonly use four AC-drive locos in a 2+1+1 distributed power configuration, which stay with train the whole way to Vancouver.

This is Stoney Creek bridge (not my photo):


Eastbound over SCB
Photograph by David R. Spencer. Please retain this attribution., CC BY-SA 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>, via Wikimedia Commons
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,115
AFAIK - not very common in the UK nowadays, even the Lickey banking is now done on an 'as required' basis rather than a banker being stationed there full time.
That actually goes a long way back, to when Hymeks were bankers! The base at Bromsgrove was closed due to little use. Because the bank was just inside the Western Region boundary a banking loco, if required, then had to be sent all the way from Gloucester.
 

matchmaker

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
1,514
Location
Central Scotland
A fascinating and informative video - we are very lucky videos like this one are available to watch.


A vey beautiful and scenic photo, thanks.

How common is banking today? and what other notorious inclines does anyone know about? The Baxenden bank between Accrington and Bury was I think a 1 in 38.
Cowlairs, out of Glasgow Queen Street High Level is 1 in 41 at its steepest and you are starting from a dead stop. It's not a problem for 385s or 2+4 and 2+5 HSTs, but laden DMUs aren't exactly romping up! Back in the days of 101s it was quite a drag.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,115
Cowlairs, out of Glasgow Queen Street High Level is 1 in 41 at its steepest and you are starting from a dead stop. It's not a problem for 385s or 2+4 and 2+5 HSTs, but laden DMUs aren't exactly romping up! Back in the days of 101s it was quite a drag.
There was actually a procedure in the days of 101s holding down all the local services to Falkirk Grahamston, Stirling, etc. If an inbound train had one engine out, this was advised forward, a loco was sent down from Eastfield to Queen Street, the dmu was called on into the same platform, and the loco banked the unit back up to the depot. And another dmu was sent down to an adjacent platform to continue the diagram.

My only 101 departure ever from Queen Street was a substitute for the 2 x 27 push-pull to Edinburgh. Only three cars, and with standees. It was probably doing 20-25 mph by the top.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
5,792
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Miles Platting bank....one and half miles from the platform ends at Manchester Victoria and 1 in 44 at its steepest.. Even we'll into diesel days there were two or three banking engines waiting in the middle road at Vic.

I believe that - contrary to the usual GWR practice of piloting from the front - pannier tanks were used for banking freight trains from Stourbridge Junction up to Old Hill.... although I'm open to correction on that.
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
8,467
Location
Up the creek
I read (not sure whether it was this thread or another now) that, at least at some boxes, not only was there a special bell code to warn the next box there was a banker, but there were different bell codes to indicate the number of banking engines to expect.

It was in the Regulations for Train Signalling and Signalmen’s General Instructions (our bible) that 2-2 was sent after the Train Entering Section had been acknowledged, with 2-3-1 being sent if the assisting locomotive had one or two brake vans (1972 edition). These codes only applied where authorised and I never worked at anywhere where it was. It was amended in the early 1980s (1983?) and the paper that I carefully taped in says that if there was more than one loco assisting, the signalman in advance should be advised of the number (which was presumably done by ‘phone). I am not sure whether that existed from 1972 or earlier, or 2-2 was sent for each assisting loco.

The Regulations were a national set of rules, but there might have been occasional variations to suit local circumstances. Similarly, before the creation of a single set signalling regulations for the whole of BR (1960, I think) there were probably variations due to hangovers from pre-grouping days.
 

Andy873

Member
Joined
23 Mar 2017
Messages
965
Would there be occasions where the two drivers (the lead train and the banker) would need to communicate whilst on the move? and if so, how? some whistle code? e.g. to say "More power".
 

Top