• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Fully reserved trains with unreserved seats

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
3,633
The Grand Central service I'm on this evening has the following message on the PIS.

'This is a fully reserved service. Coach B has unreserved seats'.

I know what they mean, but who could blame anyone who was confused...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,431
The Grand Central service I'm on this evening has the following message on the PIS.

'This is a fully reserved service. Coach B has unreserved seats'.

I know what they mean, but who could blame anyone who was confused...
I don't, can you resolve the apparent contradiction for me please.

Is it something like what they had on the Euston to Manchester services where there was a coach that was dedicated for passengers without reservations and on the rest of the train there was the option of reserving a seat?
 

SynthD

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
1,172
Location
UK
I think that means some customers are sold a named seat and others are sold an unnamed seat. The number of unnamed seats is the limit of tickets that can be sold without a reservation for a named seat.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,828
Location
Glasgow
I took it to mean all the reserveable seats were reserved and only those which could not be reserved were thus available.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
3,633
I took it to mean all the reserveable seats were reserved and only those which could not be reserved were thus available.
So did I but, given it is not possible to reserve a Grand Central seat when already on board, I'm not sure how this information is meant to be useful for passengers?

Wouldn't it be simpler to say 'all seats are reserved on this service, except for unreserved seats in coach B'?
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,828
Location
Glasgow
So did I but, given it is not possible to reserve a Grand Central seat when already on board, I'm not sure how this information is meant to be useful for passengers?

Wouldn't it be simpler to say 'all seats are reserved on this service, except for unreserved seats in coach B'?
I agree, it's poor phrasing.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,974
Location
Yorkshire
Poor wording, yes.

But in line with expectations from Grand Central, who arent the most passenger-friendly of operators.

I get the impression the company lacks anyone with any PR skills, or decent English qualifications (not to mention lack of understanding of consumer and contract law, the Conditions of travel etc, but that's another story!)

You would have thought they'd have someone who could get messaging in order, but seemingly not; as a result, I look at them as a bit of a mickey mouse operation these days. It's a shame as I want open access to succeed, but they really are an absolute shambles.
 
Last edited:

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,681
Compared to most of the things that this operator does it’s fairly acceptable. All of the seats that can be reserved have been reserved. If you’re wandering through a carriage without a seat reservation looking for a seat without one you’ll not have much luck, the message directs you to coach B where there are some seats that have not been reserved. Of course, if you’ve got on the train anywhere other than coach B then the chances are by the time you walk all the way through or get off and back on again the unreserved seats will have been taken by other passengers.

Quite often (and this goes for any service really) if you’re not at the front of the queue for the limited unreserved seating then you’re better off standing and / or walking through the train on departure to see who hasn’t turned up. There could be 100 people without reservations wanting 30 unreserved seats but there could be another 30 no shows scattered throughout the train.
 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,431
You can't reserve a seat, because all those that can be reserved have been taken. Coach B seats cannot be reserved - its a free-for-all.
Thanks, so like what I have experienced, an unreserved coach for those without reservations, in this specific case the only seating option available.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
1,618
Location
All around the network
Even when I reserve a seat I like sitting in an unreserved coach and choosing my own seat. Especially if you use fare splitting, a seat is automoatically allocated so I often prefer my choice to the one I am randomly allocated.
 

ChrisDY10

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2022
Messages
22
Location
Kidderminster
Even when I reserve a seat I like sitting in an unreserved coach and choosing my own seat. Especially if you use fare splitting, a seat is automoatically allocated so I often prefer my choice to the one I am randomly allocated.
Which makes the whole compulsory reservation for advance tickets a complete joke!!
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
2,762
Location
Somerset
I don't, can you resolve the apparent contradiction for me please.

Is it something like what they had on the Euston to Manchester services where there was a coach that was dedicated for passengers without reservations and on the rest of the train there was the option of reserving a seat?
If the train is genuinely “fully reserved” then there can be no “unreserved” seats. “All reservable seats have been reserved, but there are some which cannot be reserved” is something different - but not very snappy.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,614
If the train is genuinely “fully reserved” then there can be no “unreserved” seats. “All reservable seats have been reserved, but there are some which cannot be reserved” is something different - but not very snappy.
“All reversations taken. Some unreserved seats in Coach C” could work?
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
735
For those that don't regularly use GC services, on the 180s it is only a portion of coach B that is unreservable, approximately the half nearest the drivers cab.
 

deep south

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2012
Messages
77
Our trip on Tuesday from Sunderland also had this message, so it looks like GC loadings are quite healthy. Although a reasonable proportion of the reserved seats weren't occupied, and I didn't see anyone having to stand on the 12:30 departure.
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
735
Our trip on Tuesday from Sunderland also had this message, so it looks like GC loadings are quite healthy. Although a reasonable proportion of the reserved seats weren't occupied, and I didn't see anyone having to stand on the 12:30 departure.
In my experience there are usually seats available Sunderland to York, but beyond York to London is almost always fully seated with occasional need for standing. Same in reverse.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
The Grand Central service I'm on this evening has the following message on the PIS.

'This is a fully reserved service. Coach B has unreserved seats'.

I know what they mean, but who could blame anyone who was confused...
It is contradictory. If it's a fully reserved service then one coach being unreserved makes no sense. The number of seats being reserved is irrelevant. I know that this is common with TOC's but in the truest sense it's not accurate surely.
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
735
It is contradictory. If it's a fully reserved service then one coach being unreserved makes no sense. The number of seats being reserved is irrelevant. I know that this is common with TOC's but in the truest sense it's not accurate surely.
One coach is not unreserved, it is only roughly half of coach B, which means just half a carriage out of 4 Standard class in a five car 180.
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,407
Location
Betchworth, Surrey
The Grand Central service I'm on this evening has the following message on the PIS.

'This is a fully reserved service. Coach B has unreserved seats'.

I know what they mean, but who could blame anyone who was confused...
Abysmal information, as is becoming the norm on today's railway, where so much stuff seems to have been cobbled together by semi-illiterates.
 

Purple Train

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2022
Messages
1,507
Location
Darkest Commuterland
The trouble is that, while it is poor phrasing, other methods of phrasing it would also likely be complained about on this Forum for being too verbose! You can't really win with these kinds of announcements - either, in a bid for simplification, you lose clarity (in worse cases, accuracy), or, in a bid for clarity, you lose simplicity. Considering the standards of communication on the rest of the railway, I think that those linking this to GC's attitude regarding ticket acceptance, Conditions of Travel, etc. are barking very much up the wrong tree.

My personal preference would have been for something like, "All seats that can be reserved have been reserved on this service; however, we do have seats which cannot be reserved, and are therefore free for those without seat reservations to sit in. These unreserved seats can be found in carriage B." In such a case, I'd have lost half the train in the last clause of the first sentence, but I wouldn't have been pedantic enough for some (who would doubtless have pointed out that the unreserved seats can, in fact, be sat in by passengers already holding a seat reservation).

It boils down to whether the announcement is really necessary. In its most basic form (free seats are in coach B), I think it probably is helpful (but, again, it won't be detailed enough for some and will be unnecessary white noise to others), but I'm less sure about how necessary it is to announce the service as "fully reserved".

Announcements are such a tightrope act that, in my opinion, you can very rarely please some of the people some of the time. But then I've never tried making them, so I could, of course, be completely wrong!
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
3,633
The trouble is that, while it is poor phrasing, other methods of phrasing it would also likely be complained about on this Forum for being too verbose! You can't really win with these kinds of announcements - either, in a bid for simplification, you lose clarity (in worse cases, accuracy), or, in a bid for clarity, you lose simplicity. Considering the standards of communication on the rest of the railway, I think that those linking this to GC's attitude regarding ticket acceptance, Conditions of Travel, etc. are barking very much up the wrong tree.

My personal preference would have been for something like, "All seats that can be reserved have been reserved on this service; however, we do have seats which cannot be reserved, and are therefore free for those without seat reservations to sit in. These unreserved seats can be found in carriage B." In such a case, I'd have lost half the train in the last clause of the first sentence, but I wouldn't have been pedantic enough for some (who would doubtless have pointed out that the unreserved seats can, in fact, be sat in by passengers already holding a seat reservation).

It boils down to whether the announcement is really necessary. In its most basic form (free seats are in coach B), I think it probably is helpful (but, again, it won't be detailed enough for some and will be unnecessary white noise to others), but I'm less sure about how necessary it is to announce the service as "fully reserved".

Announcements are such a tightrope act that, in my opinion, you can very rarely please some of the people some of the time. But then I've never tried making them, so I could, of course, be completely wrong!
As I suggested above, wouldn't ''all seats are reserved on this service, except for unreserved seats in coach B' be simple and clear?
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,500
Location
London
As I suggested above, wouldn't ''all seats are reserved on this service, except for unreserved seats in coach B' be simple and clear?

Possibly. On the other hand, depending on how you read it, your suggestion seems no better than the phrasing they’ve chosen. A perfectly clear announcement would be longer, and you’d then no doubt complain that it was too verbose.

In any case, given that you’ve yourself acknowledged that seats cannot be reserved once aboard, is this announcement really likely to cause confusion in a way that inconveniences anybody? It strikes me as a fuss about nothing.
 
Last edited:

GordonT

Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
509
"Good Morning/Afternoon/Evening everyone! There are some unreserved seats still available in Coach B" would probably attune with Mr/Mrs/Ms Normal's attention span.
 

sh24

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2023
Messages
108
Location
London
“If you don’t have a seat reservation there are some seats in coach B, otherwise this train is fully booked”
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
735
"Good Morning/Afternoon/Evening everyone! There are some unreserved seats still available in Coach B" would probably attune with Mr/Mrs/Ms Normal's attention span.
There MAY be some unreserved seats in Coach B would be safer (plus where coach B is front/rear)
 

GordonT

Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
509
There MAY be some unreserved seats in Coach B would be safer (plus where coach B is front/rear)
Yes that's fair. Main thing is to avoid anaesthetising normal punters by regaling them with the minutiae of the operator's reservation policies.
 

Top