• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Potential up to 2,000 job losses at Alstom Derby

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,344
Order ?. I doubt it.

More likely hinting that SE could use the things that SWR don't seem to think they need !.
Could be both. Surplus of SWR sets transfer plus a top-up of a new order. SWR had an option for additional sets, if it hasn’t expired it could be activated to avoid tendering the requirement.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
6,554
Location
UK
Yes most likely, thats what happens when you let your industries become foreign owned, its happened time and time again and we never seem to learn (or those in charge don't care anyway).
More cost effective in the long run doesn't provide tax breaks to your donors in the short-run.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,490
Could be both. Surplus of SWR sets transfer plus a top-up of a new order. SWR had an option for additional sets, if it hasn’t expired it could be activated to avoid tendering the requirement.
Expired - The option was 5 extra 10-car units if ordered before October 2020. Alstom would probably still do it but would likely price higher.

Nowhere near enough spare to see off the BREL/ABB 465s (97 of them), though there should be enough within the fleet to take over 376 operations.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,344
Expired - The option was 5 extra 10-car units if ordered before October 2020. Alstom would probably still do it but would likely price higher.

Nowhere near enough spare to see off the BREL/ABB 465s (97 of them), though there should be enough within the fleet to take over 376 operations.
The other option would be to specify any tender in such a way that the only option would be Aventras. "Compatibility with existing Class 701 fleet" or similar. The same way that London Midland procured the Class 350/3s by specifying compatibility with their existing Class 350 fleet.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,585
Expired - The option was 5 extra 10-car units if ordered before October 2020. Alstom would probably still do it but would likely price higher.

Nowhere near enough spare to see off the BREL/ABB 465s (97 of them), though there should be enough within the fleet to take over 376 operations.
Plus any SWR don’t need…..
Do 5 or 10 car 701s match the train lengths/platforms on any SE routes?
 

Dan G

Member
Joined
12 May 2021
Messages
531
Location
Exeter
Newport and Goole are pure assembly but then so is Nissan Sunderland! Few people would say no cars are made there. What matters to UK economy is where the parts are from.
Nissan Sunderland most certainly does bend metal
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
Plus any SWR don’t need…..
Do 5 or 10 car 701s match the train lengths/platforms on any SE routes?
No the ideal is 12 car on Charing Cross or Cannon Street if SDO were to be fitted (in the previous tender) or 8car for Victoria or Blackfriars (10 car with SDO would work for many of these station as there are plenty of easy extensions.
 

RUK

Member
Joined
5 Aug 2009
Messages
34
Location
East of England
Is there an excess of Class 701s in the SWR order? You could probably get extra vehicles in the new order by extending the 10-car Class 701s to 12-car for Southeastern, for those routes which can take them.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,887
Is there an excess of Class 701s in the SWR order?
There are more class 701 vehicles on order than the combined class 455, 458 and 707 fleet currently in use.
You could probably get extra vehicles in the new order by extending the 10-car Class 701s to 12-car for Southeastern, for those routes which can take them.
That runs into siding space issues.
 

Trainman40083

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
390
Location
Derby
Is there an excess of Class 701s in the SWR order? You could probably get extra vehicles in the new order by extending the 10-car Class 701s to 12-car for Southeastern, for those routes which can take them.
Are the 10 car 701 units, the same length as Networker 12 car units?
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,290
Location
West Wiltshire
Are the 10 car 701 units, the same length as Networker 12 car units?
No, they are about 202m (12car networker is about 242m) from memory.

No doubt someone will be along and quote length to a milimetre

There are more class 701 vehicles on order than the combined class 455, 458 and 707 fleet currently in use.
At the time of ordering (in 2017) there were almost same number of vehicles already, compared to 750 ordered, consisting 91x4 (455), 24x2 (456), 36x5 (458), 30x5 (707) =742, so was almost one for one replacement, not an expansion (although the 707s were still entering service back in 2017)
 
Last edited:

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,344
No, they are about 202m (12car networker is about 242m) from memory.

No doubt someone will be along and quote length to a milimetre


At the time of ordering (in 2017) there were almost same number of vehicles already, compared to 750 ordered, consisting 91x4 (455), 24x2 (456), 36x5 (458), 30x5 (707) =742, so was almost one for one replacement, not an expansion (although the 707s were still entering service back in 2017)
Given that this was to cover an expanded service - particularly to Reading and Windsor - there would appear to be less sets now needed. As Reading now no longer has peak extras, and there appears to be no intention of bringing them back, then you'd think at least 10 x 10-car sets would now be surplus.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,287
Location
West of Andover
No the ideal is 12 car on Charing Cross or Cannon Street if SDO were to be fitted (in the previous tender) or 8car for Victoria or Blackfriars (10 car with SDO would work for many of these station as there are plenty of easy extensions.

However won't a 10 coach unit foul some of the junctions on the routes out of Victoria towards Lewisham & Orpington?
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,403
However won't a 10 coach unit foul some of the junctions on the routes out of Victoria towards Lewisham & Orpington?
Brixton southbound if the stopping point isn't changed (which is do-able if a little unusual to have the door not opening at the front rather than the back with SDO)
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
1,884
Location
Bath
There are more class 701 vehicles on order than the combined class 455, 458 and 707 fleet currently in use.
Currently in use is the key though. SWR has a shortage of units and key routes often end up with short forms (although many in spirit in that they are diagramed shorter than they should be)
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,867
Nissan Sunderland most certainly does bend metal
Indeed! They make engines there as well, and a battery plant is being built next door, it's a major manufacturing site, much more so than Alstom Derby.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,706
There is no need for this. Replacements for class 15x stock needed very soon and SE networkers and GWR/chiltern Turbos not so far behind... lets have a long term strategy.
 

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,269
Location
York
We are now in a period of intense discussions with the UK Government and Transport for London about a potential train order for the Elizabeth line, given the levels of passenger demand. This could help secure the future of our Derby Litchurch Lane site. (1/2)

Alstom is still hoping for that order for EL.

All parties have agreed to conclude discussions as soon as possible - and no later than the end of May. We will be making no further comment at this time. (2/2)

Fingers crossed a solution is reached.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,176
Location
Somewhere, not in London
You get the feeling that things are starting to move forward. Be interesting to see how many trains (if any) get ordered.
So just when anyone good has found alternative employment they’ll try to restart with all contractors, quality will be low and then that will be the last contract that is delivered by Derby
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,887
You get the feeling that things are starting to move forward. Be interesting to see how many trains (if any) get ordered.
The Rail Minister took an urgent question on the matter in Parliament today. Two key points made among others were that any award to Derby needs to be legally watertight in the context of there being four manufacturers with plant in the UK, and that trains are built for a life of 35 to 40 years.
 

Trainman40083

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
390
Location
Derby
The Rail Minister took an urgent question on the matter in Parliament today. Two key points made among others were that any award to Derby needs to be legally watertight in the context of there being four manufacturers with plant in the UK, and that trains are built for a life of 35 to 40 years.
Oh yes, VERY legally watertight. Can only be through an existing option.
 

wickham

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2021
Messages
184
Location
Knaphill
Re: post 859: "Discussions to be concluded by the end of May" - they needed an order months ago. If one IS placed at the end of may it will mean a complete restart of the whole sourcing/building process - some of those suppliers have apparently already ceased trading and staff have found new jobs. Nothing will actually start to take shape for months and what do they do with the staff in the meantime ? I can see a bit of a fiasco building here........
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,176
Location
Somewhere, not in London
The site is essentially dead already now. The only reason to keep it as it “was” now is nostalgia. Effort would be more productively focused by the govt on finding alternative industries for the operatives that havnt found other work yet.

JCP is useless at this though of course
 

meld3

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2019
Messages
137
Location
West Midlands
Re: post 859: "Discussions to be concluded by the end of May" - they needed an order months ago. If one IS placed at the end of may it will mean a complete restart of the whole sourcing/building process - some of those suppliers have apparently already ceased trading and staff have found new jobs. Nothing will actually start to take shape for months and what do they do with the staff in the meantime ? I can see a bit of a fiasco building here........
Kicking the can down the road in the hope an election is called and Purdah kicks in....
 

Top