70014IronDuke
Established Member
- Joined
- 13 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 3,875
I'm starting a new thread on this as it is important stuff (IMO) - but it has been posted on the LHCS thread here
https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/cumbrian-coast-lhcs.110539/page-36#post-3177283
and is likely to get lost.
https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/cumbrian-coast-lhcs.110539/page-36#post-3177283
and is likely to get lost.
It seems to be the Maryport - Carlisle section that is the problem, someone will doubtless be along who actually knows the answer. IIRC the Maryport and Carlisle railway was built to a more parsimonious loading gauge. Discussions about what is cleared where seem to often come down to the imponderable question as to if the stock would fit, but no one has cleared it, could be made to fit with trifling work or simply won't fit without a lot of civil engineering and people never seem to know which.
I believe it's some of the bridges between Maryport and Carlisle that have very tight clearances, and the same reason that any droplight stock has to have window bars fitted or a staff member by each door/window to use this prt of the route.
Apologies, you are correct. The sectional appendix says "Prohibited between Maryport and Carlisle South Jn". They are a bit (4") wider than the 153/156 though the 158 (and some modern units) seems to me to be similar sized to the 153 which is permitted or (horror!) Wikipedia is wrong. There are no tunnels on the Maryport and Carlisle I think so surely this is surmountable?
Apologies we are drifting OT, from LHCS to how to replace it! As we are off topic how on earth did we get to this crazy situation of what is cleared for what route? I can guess that, but when can we expect to see something closer to universal?
I believe it's some of the bridges between Maryport and Carlisle that have very tight clearances, and the same reason that any droplight stock has to have window bars fitted or a staff member by each door/window to use this prt of the route.
Last edited: