• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Lewisham military trestle bridge

Status
Not open for further replies.

Geogregor

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2016
Messages
336
Location
London
Only today I have learned why one of the rail bridges in Lewisham area looks so weird. This one:

post-6902-0-16967300-1472226532.jpg


It was built by military as a quick replacement of previous bridge destroyed during the rail crash in 1957:



So, it looks like a bit of a temporary solution, but it is stills standing, over 60 years later.

Here I have a question, what is its lifespan? Will it have to be replaced soon? It looks like tricky location logistically...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

John Webb

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Messages
3,439
Location
St Albans
The 'temporary' bridge uses military bridge components, but was designed and erected by the Southern Region of British Railways. The military helped by loading the required items into wagons from their store on the Longmoor military railway. A very detailed description of both the clear-up of the old bridge remains and the erection of the new is given in "St John's Lewisham 50 years on" by Peter Tatlow, published by The Oakwood Press in 2007, ISBN 0 85361 669 6. The accident happened on the 4th of December, 1957 and the temporary bridge was first tested on January 12th, 1958, a remarkable achievement!
At various times in the ensuing years there were plans to design and build a new bridge, but in the end the disruption to trains this would cause was decided to outweigh the costs of maintaining the temporary structure, and some minor alterations have been made.

(I was at in the First Year at a secondary school just the other side of St John's Station to the accident site in 1957 - we were sent home an hour early due to the thick fog and it took my bus around two hours to do a normally 25-30 minute journey. The following day the school had to send two teachers to near the site to turn back pupils eager to see the damage!)
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
9,317
Location
London
Yes very temporary and the fact its still there is somewhat endemic of British infrastructure planning! It reminds me of the "temporary" Hogarth flyover on the A4 in Chiswick.

As anyone who knows the area is aware Lewisham and surrounding junctions could ideally do with being demolished and started again but the inconvenience and cost would be astounding.
 

Dunfanaghy Rd

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2019
Messages
447
Location
Alton, Hants
There used to be a stock of Military Trestling at Woking - where Day's Stone yard is now. Clever stuff; only 1 size of bolt needed, and all the joining faces were the same size, too. Mix and match would have been relatively easy.
Pat
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,624
Also worth a look at the London reconnections articles on the the various St John Disasters:
e.g.
 

Geogregor

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2016
Messages
336
Location
London
Yes very temporary and the fact its still there is somewhat endemic of British infrastructure planning! It reminds me of the "temporary" Hogarth flyover on the A4 in Chiswick.

As anyone who knows the area is aware Lewisham and surrounding junctions could ideally do with being demolished and started again but the inconvenience and cost would be astounding.

I think that might be an issue. They don't want to touch that bridge until they know what to do around Lewisham in the long term.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top