Masbroughlad
Established Member
Have loco hauled passenger services ever made it to Manchester Airport?
Did HSTs ever start/finish there?
Did HSTs ever start/finish there?
Have loco hauled passenger services ever made it to Manchester Airport?
Did HSTs ever start/finish there?
If the current WG thinking goes ahead plus if WG still run the Wales & Borders service to Manchester, in a few years you may well see HSTs at Ringway.
This was covered in the Cambrian section, in Brief Prof Cole in charge of transport studies at the Uni of Glamorgan and main Rail consultant to Welsh Government informed a meeting at Newtown(Powys),after South Wales electrification WG are seriously looking at using surplus HSTs for the Cardiff/Holyhead & Manchester/Cardiff routes,if this occurs North Wales/Chester/piccadilly/Airport could also see HSTs to alleviate chronic overcrowding.
This was covered in the Cambrian section, in Brief Prof Cole in charge of transport studies at the Uni of Glamorgan and main Rail consultant to Welsh Government informed a meeting at Newtown(Powys),after South Wales electrification WG are seriously looking at using surplus HSTs for the Cardiff/Holyhead & Manchester/Cardiff routes,if this occurs North Wales/Chester/piccadilly/Airport could also see HSTs to alleviate chronic overcrowding.
If the current WG thinking goes ahead plus if WG still run the Wales & Borders service to Manchester, in a few years you may well see HSTs at Ringway.
Have loco hauled passenger services ever made it to Manchester Airport?
Did HSTs ever start/finish there?
I was there, building T2, when the station was built. In the beginning it was a low-key short two-platform affair not expected to take a great deal of traffic. But as traffic developed, it had to be accommodated by doubling-up units against each platform. All MUs; never saw anything more exotic whilst I was there. I believe the station is now being extended to take bigger thingys.
The question wasn't about what might happen one day, it was about what had happened in the past. Well done for going off at a complete tangent in only the first reply... :roll:
Platform lengthening is catered for in the current Northern Hub works but not required yet; passive provision.
Wouldn't it make sense to provide for more than 8 car length when building P4 in case it is required at some point which it maybe. Mind you with ORR wanting cuts and the Hub,maybe not in whole but nonetheless under threat money is no doubt the issue as always
Have definitely seen a short formed HST vice 158 on a Virgin service to Edinburgh.
Sent from my HTC One mini using Tapatalk 2
I have heard that the heavy rail platform 4 will also have the other platform face used for the Manchester Metrolink terminal station, with a fence up the middle to keep passengers seperate.
Can someone with official knowledge confirm how matters will be.
If I remember correctly there used to be a Manchester Airport to Cleethorpes train that ran through Derby, although run by a Class 153 at 170 miles it was very long journey.
A Class 153 would indeed be a most unsuitable unit for a journey of this length, speaking as one who made the Manchester Airport to Cleethorpes journey in a Class 185 last Saturday.
Totally unsuitable I agree. In fact I travelled on a Skegness - Manchester Airport train which was also a 153. Passengers were left behind at Stoke-on-Trent and people were standing all the way from Derby. Combine that with all the luggage bound for the airport and it wasn't a pleasant experience.
It was axed by the SRA due to 'low usage' though: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2663117.stm
Paul I don't think there is anything yet in the public domain as to how it will be but what you describe is what has been posted previously as to how it will be
I never understood why the Central Trains didn't call at Wilmslow but Virgin Trains did. I think low usage was one thing but punctuality was a major problem. To do the Manchester Airport to Skegness train its now 4 train journeys,
3... Man Airport to Man Pic, Man Pic to Nottingham and Nottingham to Skegness.
I think low usage was one thing but punctuality was a major problem.