Not "all". The 334s have opening windows.The only trains of that nature are the High Speed Train sets operated by Cross-Country and partly by East Coast. Then only the door windows can be opened.
All modern trains have fully sealed ventilation systems, and no opening windows/doors.
Not "all". The 334s have opening windows.
And what's with the carriage windows in the Class 158's. Why are they only openable by the conductors? Why were they not made so that the passengers could easily open them?
Hopper vents are rubbish because they only work when the train is in motion.
I used to advocate trains with pressure ventilation from the windowsDoes anyone know how I can find out if trains from London to Scotland have opening windows either in carriage or in the doors between carriages?
Open windows do also help to drown out the noise coming from headphones, mobiles and the HELLO I'M ON THE TRAIN brigade. Particularly on a 365 at full tilt.
am I missing something here?
Hopper vents are rubbish
Not a big fan of all these more modern EMU's and DMU's which have no openable windows atall. For one thing you can't hear the engine/motor noise as loud.
99.9% of passengers do not want to hear the engine noise!
They do not have A/C, thats why.
How much additional fuel is consumed by having aircon on all the time? Plus all the ridiculous lit up internal signage, automated announcements, power operated doors, and invasive CCTV 'for your safety'?
Are people just much more stupid than they used to be, that they need to be spoonfed before they can be trusted to use a train?
The power used for lights, CCTV, Doors etc will be hardly anything compared to whats used for moving the whole thing. I reccon a unit with modern AC and smooth sides without open windows will be a lot more efficient then something running with no AC and the air resistance of open windows.
The power used for lights, CCTV, Doors etc will be hardly anything compared to whats used for moving the whole thing.
I reccon a unit with modern AC and smooth sides without open windows will be a lot more efficient then something running with no AC and the air resistance of open windows.
Less power used = Less fuel burnt, usually.Yes maybe, but that isn't what I asked.
Reckoning and knowning aren't the same thing. You may well be right, but can anyone actually confirm it?
I know, thats why I used the word reccon, because I'm not certain. However it makes sence, there must be a reason why virtually all transport (and buildings for that matter) have gone onto using air conditioning systems instead of relying on open windows to cool down.