• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Pilot Engines

robert thomas

Member
Joined
2 Jun 2019
Messages
274
Location
Neath
Miles Platting bank....one and half miles from the platform ends at Manchester Victoria and 1 in 44 at its steepest.. Even we'll into diesel days there were two or three banking engines waiting in the middle road at Vic.

I believe that - contrary to the usual GWR practice of piloting from the front - pannier tanks were used for banking freight trains from Stourbridge Junction up to Old Hill.... although I'm open to correction on that.
There were numerous places where the GWR/WR banked trains
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,157
Location
Cambridge, UK
Would there be occasions where the two drivers (the lead train and the banker) would need to communicate whilst on the move? and if so, how? some whistle code? e.g. to say "More power".
Yes, whistle/horn codes would be the normal method.

The distance between the front and back of a long freight train (and that the two crews might be out-of-sight of each other) probably made it the only practical form of instant communication before radio comms became commonplace. Don't forget that on unbraked or partially brake fitted freight trains, the driver would also use whistle signals to communicate with the guard in the brake van (e.g. to tell them to apply or release the van handbrake).
 
Last edited:

matchmaker

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
1,512
Location
Central Scotland
There was actually a procedure in the days of 101s holding down all the local services to Falkirk Grahamston, Stirling, etc. If an inbound train had one engine out, this was advised forward, a loco was sent down from Eastfield to Queen Street, the dmu was called on into the same platform, and the loco banked the unit back up to the depot. And another dmu was sent down to an adjacent platform to continue the diagram.

My only 101 departure ever from Queen Street was a substitute for the 2 x 27 push-pull to Edinburgh. Only three cars, and with standees. It was probably doing 20-25 mph by the top.
The local instructions actually stated that a dmu having less than a certain number of working engines (table in the Sectional Appendix) had to be assisted in front. The loco had to have the continuous brake connected. The assistance was provided up to the top of the incline. If the unit then had sufficient engines to proceed on its diagram, the loco was released. I suspect that the procedure mentioned by @Taunton would have been used if it was decided a unit had to be removed from service.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,157
Location
Cambridge, UK
Back onto the banking engines - I watched (some time ago) a video of steam in Lancashire before 1968. It shows an unloved 8F with about eight mineral wagons trying to get up a bank without a banking engine.

The driver tried four times to get up the bank, each time staling. Every time he took the train back down the bank to try again, but he couldn't get all the way down because of a catch point. In the end, he had to split the train and come back for the rest. Normally I think it would have been expected to be able to climb the bank with so few wagons, but this was towards the end of steam and the 8F was clearly in need of some maintenance which wasn't going to happen.
It's also possible the loco had run out of sand (or the depot had!).

That actually goes a long way back, to when Hymeks were bankers! The base at Bromsgrove was closed due to little use. Because the bank was just inside the Western Region boundary a banking loco, if required, then had to be sent all the way from Gloucester.
I grew up not too far away from Bromsgrove, and occasionally visited the station in the 1970s (post-Hymek). There was often a banking loco/locos parked there, so I suspect (even if they were not crewed all the time) that they only went back to Gloucester when necessary (AFAIK they could be refueled at Worcester). No idea if they were crewed from Gloucester or Worcester.
 

LWB

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2009
Messages
241
The origin of the word pilot is maritime, and predates the advent of the railway. A pilot provides safe passage through dangerous channels and currents to get ships in and out of harbours. Railway usage borrows from the maritime origin and probably goes back almost to the beginning of railway history.
This of course is the source of the term pilot engine to describe the engine sent out a few minutes before the Royal Train. (Once upon a time)
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,432
I believe that - contrary to the usual GWR practice of piloting from the front - pannier tanks were used for banking freight trains from Stourbridge Junction up to Old Hill.... although I'm open to correction on that.
I think perceptions of GW practice are coloured by what happened on the South Devon banks (and how heavily covered/photographed it was). My 1962 operating data folder for the Birmingham District lists 25 locations where "arrangements for assisting on inclines" existed. Of these only one (Leamington to Hatton) specified assistance at the front, the other 24 were all assistance at rear, including from Stourbridge Junction.

Yes, whistle/horn codes would be the normal method.

The distance between the front and back of a long freight train (and that the two crews might be out-of-sight of each other) probably made it the only practical form of instant communication before radio comms became commonplace. Don't forget that on unbraked or partially brake fitted freight trains, the driver would also use whistle signals to communicate with the guard in the brake van (e.g. to tell them to apply or release the van handbrake).
Also worth remembering that the crews of the banking engines at places like Bromsgrove, Beattock, Tebay and Oxenholme would be very experienced and know those few miles of track very well. They probably spent more than half their careers going up and down that damned hill!
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,157
Location
Cambridge, UK
lso worth remembering that the crews of the banking engines at places like Bromsgrove, Beattock, Tebay and Oxenholme would be very experienced and know those few miles of track very well. They probably spent more than half their careers going up and down that damned hill!
Yes, I agree. I think banking trains (especially long and heavy freights) is one of those things that looks relatively easy but actually needs a lot of skill and experience to do safely and efficiently, especially on a climb with varying gradients and curvature (and bad weather/wet leaves etc.).

I have an American video which has a cab ride in manned 'pusher' set on the rear of freight climbing a twisty 2.2% gradient in Oregon. The driver was chatting to the presenter, but was also constantly keeping an eye on the gauges as well as looking ahead and making adjustments to the power controller when needed. With the pusher set comprising a pair of SD40-2 locos (equivalent to around four cl. 37s here), if you mishandled that much tractive effort I imagine things could go wrong pretty quickly...
 

Andy873

Member
Joined
23 Mar 2017
Messages
963
Also worth remembering that the crews of the banking engines at places like Bromsgrove, Beattock, Tebay and Oxenholme would be very experienced and know those few miles of track very well. They probably spent more than half their careers going up and down that damned hill!

Yes, I agree. I think banking trains (especially long and heavy freights) is one of those things that looks relatively easy but actually needs a lot of skill and experience to do safely and efficiently, especially on a climb with varying gradients and curvature (and bad weather/wet leaves etc.).
I agree too, when you sit back and think about what the two crews were doing it really does look skilful.

This begs a question especially for steam locos - would a driver who hadn't done banking before have to learn the hard way, or would an experienced driver teach them? that is, under instruction?
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,432
I agree too, when you sit back and think about what the two crews were doing it really does look skilful.

This begs a question especially for steam locos - would a driver who hadn't done banking before have to learn the hard way, or would an experienced driver teach them? that is, under instruction?
The driver would have started as a fireman (usually at the same depot) and would have worked numerous duties as a fireman, during which the driver would explain* what he was doing, why he was doing it and would - unofficially but helpfully - pick up the shovel and let the fireman take over. Under his supervision.

If a driver transferred in from somewhere else (and I suspect this would have been rare at the depots involved#) the process of route learning would probably include guidance on banking arrangements.

* Most drivers would try to help junior colleagues to learn the job. Every shed would have its quota of awkward or miserable ******s who wouldn't, but over a period of time firemen would "learn the ropes".

# Generally speaking staff transferred out of smaller depots to larger depots and from remote depots to big city depots where there were better opportunities for promotion and remuneration. The likes of Tebay or Beattock would not generally be attractive to outsiders.
 

Top