I note that today there are, sadly, perhaps 'three under'. I also noted that TOC tweets speak of 'hit by train', so someone is not following the earlier quoted advice.
Thameslink still in a complete mess. Currently sitting on a Sevenoaks train at Blackfriars - we are 37 minutes late and apparently holding here 'for a member of train crew' (and presumably holding up everything in the core behind us. Doesn't fill you with confidence for the recovery plans when the new timetable is in place. (I'm surprised they haven't kicked us off and dumped it into the siding, though that may still happen.)
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
And that's exactly what they've done. There's also a northbound 387 that hasn't moved in all the time we've been here.
I'm inclined to say it's to do with the line speed and lack of staff more than anything else. Borehamwood and Mill Hill Broadway have similar issues on the same line.there are no reports of 3 people being hit. It is just the 1 woman that has been hit at Leagrave.
Quite a few of these incidents happen at Leagrave, wonder what's wrong with that town that makes people want to kill themselves.......![]()
I'm inclined to say it's to do with the line speed and lack of staff more than anything else. Borehamwood and Mill Hill Broadway have similar issues on the same line.
Over the years steps have been taken to make suicide more difficult than it used to be. OTC drugs such as paracetamol are only available in small quantities. Catalytic converters and diesel engines produce much less CO. Natural gas has replaced town gas. Etc, etc. All this means that the railway is now one of the most accessible means of self-destruction. Clearly more can be done to make the system more secure - look how rare suicides are on HS1 - but at a considerable cost.
Still, suicides on the railway as a proportion of total suicides has been broadly static for years. (I can't find the source, but it is official somewhere).
Over the years steps have been taken to make suicide more difficult than it used to be. OTC drugs such as paracetamol are only available in small quantities. Catalytic converters and diesel engines produce much less CO. Natural gas has replaced town gas. Etc, etc. All this means that the railway is now one of the most accessible means of self-destruction. Clearly more can be done to make the system more secure - look how rare suicides are on HS1 - but at a considerable cost.
The earlier advice has changed within the last couple of weeks, and a "person hit by a train" is now the correct terminology.I also noted that TOC tweets speak of 'hit by train', so someone is not following the earlier quoted advice.
Leagrave is a part of Luton, and I can only speculate that the reason Leagrave has a few such incidents is that some of the town's less affluent estates are not too far away from the station. This happens in spite of the station having gatelines and being staffed through the day.Quite a few of these incidents happen at Leagrave, wonder what's wrong with that town that makes people want to kill themselves.......![]()
What really benefits HS1 is that there are no fast trains passing through platforms. On lines such as the East Coast Main Lines, I think there are more of these incidents at stations where there are fast line platforms than those where there are only slow line platforms.The lack of stations on HS1 obviously helps, only Stratford and Ebbsfleet offer easy access to fast moving trains, but there really is no realistic way of making the rest of the network so secure.
In fairness to Thameslink (GTR)
We can all help by looking out for people who need support.
there are no reports of 3 people being hit. It is just the 1 woman that has been hit at Leagrave.
Quite a few of these incidents happen at Leagrave, wonder what's wrong with that town that makes people want to kill themselves.......![]()
1P64 struck a "person" at Leagrave around 1805 according to magic box.
What really benefits HS1 is that there are no fast trains passing through platforms. On lines such as the East Coast Main Lines, I think there are more of these incidents at stations where there are fast line platforms than those where there are only slow line platforms.
Apparently the lines out of Paddington have by far the highest suicide rate and the number of quiet stations with fast trains passing through every few minutes must be a significant factor?
I have wondered whether there could be an ethnic reason for the number on lines out through Slough. The stats do not reveal these data, although I assume the police are recording such. I'm thinking of 'forced marriage' and other such reasons for unhappiness and despair. Perhaps the Samaritans may have insight.
So suicides are down to being poor or ethnic. Wow, someone should tell the many well off white folk who commit suicide.Leagrave is a part of Luton, and I can only speculate that the reason Leagrave has a few such incidents is that some of the town's less affluent estates are not too far away from the station. This happens in spite of the station having gatelines and being staffed through the day.
Actually, my point about less affluent estates was that these can also have a higher proportion of people in social housing for reasons of (mental) health issues as much as economic reasons. I have no idea whether there is any relationship between such matters but Radlett and Harpenden, which are both considered well off, don't seem to have as many suicide incidents.So suicides are down to being poor or ethnic. Wow, someone should tell the many well off white folk who commit suicide.
So suicides are down to being poor or ethnic. Wow, someone should tell the many well off white folk who commit suicide.
I knew someone (it's unfortunate, but there) would not read the posts concerned properly and leap in, inappropriately. 'Wondering' and 'speculating' are not synonyms for 'stating a fact'.
They are invitations to someone who may know about an issue to respond if they have the knowledge.
That's definitely the issue at Surbiton on platform 2.The earlier advice has changed within the last couple of weeks, and a "person hit by a train" is now the correct terminology.
Leagrave is a part of Luton, and I can only speculate that the reason Leagrave has a few such incidents is that some of the town's less affluent estates are not too far away from the station. This happens in spite of the station having gatelines and being staffed through the day.
What really benefits HS1 is that there are no fast trains passing through platforms. On lines such as the East Coast Main Lines, I think there are more of these incidents at stations where there are fast line platforms than those where there are only slow line platforms.
That was always my understanding for the incidents in the Southall area.I have wondered whether there could be an ethnic reason for the number on lines out through Slough. The stats do not reveal these data, although I assume the police are recording such. I'm thinking of 'forced marriage' and other such reasons for unhappiness and despair. Perhaps the Samaritans may have insight.
I'd take that with a mountain of salt. An activist group makes the claim without an official or even cited source. It also dubiously changes context throughout, for example early on it implies the numbers of suicides are for Southall then later correctly states they're for the entire stretch from Paddington.That was always my understanding for the incidents in the Southall area.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/abus...soaring-toll-of-railway-suicides-6614996.html
Well said. If you see someone you are worried about tell station staff asap.
I read it, thank you.
I just personally feel that your post is implying there's a link between a high incidence of railway fatalities in the Slough area and the local ethnic demographic. The reference to forced marriage part particularly feels like an ethnic stereotype.
Mental health issues effect people indiscriminately of creed, class or race. The causes can not be so easily pinned to such criteria.
I think you may find correlation, but that's not necessarily the cause of the correlation. I honestly imagine that you'd find more correlation between linespeed and frequency of trains than anything else for hotspots.
While it's sad, it could be worse; generally these people are not taking a bunch of others with them, although the way the railway deals with the aftermath could perhaps be quicker, more effective, and better communicated?