• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Should the Cromford and High Peak Railway Line reopen?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tetudo boy

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2018
Messages
382
Location
Near Liverpool
This is something that has been circulating in my mind lately, should the Cromford and High Peak Railway Line reopen?

If you don't know what this railway line was, the Cromford and High Peak Railway was a railway line running from Whatstandwell to Whaley Bridge. The Line opened in 1831 and was closed in stages from 1963 to 1967 due to the Beeching cut's.

With the 2020 Initiative (aka De-Beeching process) of reopening closed lines, I thought it would be worthy to mention this line reopening. This is mainly because I thought it would act as a useful Intercity line connecting Manchester and the north-west with the Midland Main Line, and could also serve some local communities.

Thoughts?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,686
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
This is something that has been circulating in my mind lately, should the Cromford and High Peak Railway Line reopen?

If you don't know what this railway line was, the Cromford and High Peak Railway was a railway line running from Whatstandwell to Whaley Bridge. The Line opened in 1831 and was closed in stages from 1963 to 1967 due to the Beeching cut's.

With the 2020 Initiative (aka De-Beeching process) of reopening closed lines, I thought it would be worthy to mention this line reopening. This is mainly because I thought it would act as a useful Intercity line connecting Manchester and the north-west with the Midland Main Line, and could also serve some local communities.

Thoughts?

Apart from the fact that there aren’t many communities along the route, and the fact that the route is duplicated on a better alignment by Matlock to Buxton via Bakewell which would be more useful in terms of where it goes (serves Darley Dale, Rowsley and Bakewell, and doesn’t avoid Matlock), there’s the small matter of three inclines at the Cromford end, two of which are extremely severe. That alone would completely kill re-opening even if it was otherwise able to be justified.

The only prospect for re-opening this route would be as a kinky tourist attraction, probably some kind of narrow gauge railway, but this would run into conflict with the cycle path lobby. This would also still have to find a safe and viable way of negotiating the inclines.

It’s a nice idea, but sadly it’s not going to happen. If only one could travel back in time!
 
Last edited:

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,052
Location
Herts
A very interesting idea. An ex work mate (no longer with us alas) , saw it working in it's glorious last years and then referred to it as a "self sustaining" railway, as it's "raison d'etre" by then it seemed to be in business for serving the requirements of the railway - water tenders , loco coal etc , with the very odd revenue load of silica or something similar.

Of course , it must have been built for a purpose , but that moment had passed. I guess.
 

tetudo boy

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2018
Messages
382
Location
Near Liverpool
Apart from the fact that there aren’t many communities along the route, and the fact that there route is duplicated by Matlock to Buxton via Bakewell which would be more useful, there’s the small matter of three inclines at the Cromford end, two of which are extremely severe. That alone would completely kill re-opening even if it was otherwise able to be justified.
What I should've mentioned is that those could be altered in some way when they are reconstructed, however, I somehow thought it was irrelevant, but I think it could happen now that I've changed my mind.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,778
What I should've mentioned is that those could be altered in some way when they are reconstructed, however, I somehow thought it was irrelevant, but I think it could happen now that I've changed my mind.

The inclines varied between 1 in 8 and 1 in 14 (four of them). If they could be easily bypassed they would have been in the first place.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,686
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
The inclines varied between 1 in 8 and 1 in 14 (four of them). If they could be easily bypassed they would have been in the first place.

The ones at the Buxton end ultimately were (5 in total at that end if my memory serves?). I don’t know how the ones at the Cromford end could be though. Both the Cromford and Middleton inclines are seriously fearsome.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
4,722
Location
Hope Valley
So the OP is basically proposing contracting a brand new main line alignment through the middle of a National Park with no intermediate stations to serve the area?

Interestingly, after the Sheep Pasture and Cromford Inclines (1:8 or 1:9) were amalgamated they discovered that detached wagons could (and occasionally DID) exceed 100mph if they ran away. Hence the 'catch pit' built at Cromford as the first piece of railway infrastructure in the world explicitly designed to handle three-figure (Imperial) speeds. And it worked!
 
Last edited:

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,686
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
So the OP is basically proposing contracting a brand new main line alignment through the middle of a National Park with no intermediate stations to serve the area?

Interestingly, after the Sheep Pasture and Cromford Inclines (1:8 or 1:9) were amalgamated they discovered that detached wagons could (and occasionally DID) exceed 100mph if they ran away. Hence the 'catch pit' built at Cromford as the first piece of railway infrastructure in the world explicitly designed to handle three-figure (Imperial) speeds. And it worked!

Must have been a spectacular sight to see. If I remember rightly there’s still the remains of a wagon in the catch pit at Cromford.

I remember climbing Cromford for the first time, we approached what we thought was the top, turned a corner and there was Sheep Pasture!
 

Doctor Fegg

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2010
Messages
2,126
Location
Charlbury
So the OP is basically proposing contracting a brand new main line alignment through the middle of a National Park with no intermediate stations to serve the area?

And obliterating a key part of a World Heritage Site.

Let me guess, will the reopened line be worked by Class 442s?
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
1,857
As far as I know that route never had a scheduled passenger service and there were no "stations". It was single track throughout.
I gather that it was designed and built by a canal engineer which probably explains his choice to build it largely quite level but with a few extreme (by railway standards) gradients and many sharp curves - much as you might design a canal with locks.
I suspect in order to make a " useful Intercity line " it would require what amounts to an almost complete reconstruction throughout.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
32,808
Don't be daft. It'll be 3rd rail electrified using a converted Class 91 on one end and a modified Pacer at the other as a DBSO
If it’s absolutely level how about water troughs between the rails? Then you’d just need something with a sharp knife on the end to split the hydrogen out...
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Interestingly, after the Sheep Pasture and Cromford Inclines (1:8 or 1:9) were amalgamated they discovered that detached wagons could (and occasionally DID) exceed 100mph if they ran away. Hence the 'catch pit' built at Cromford as the first piece of railway infrastructure in the world explicitly designed to handle three-figure (Imperial) speeds. And it worked!

How many pieces did the wagons end up in?!
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
2,770
Location
Northampton
The line has been well described in words, but possibly some photos will help. In the 1960s I walked the line from Cromford (having travelled by train, walking from Whatstandwell) and here's my snapshots.
The first shows the catch-pit; there were wrecked wagons in it compressed against the end of the short tunnel that formed the 'pi'.
The second shows the first gradient post - sadly, my snap of the 1 in 9 to 1 in 8 gradient post was sabotaged by the camera case.
The third shows the top of Sheep pasture incline, giving a hint at the alignment and traffic potential.






CHP Catchpit.jpgCHP Gradient post bottom of Cromford incline.jpgCHP Sheep pasture top.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top