No Fault Found
Member
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 252
ScotRail aren't using any blue power cars any more.
The picture of 43030 on the other end of the set is blue!
ScotRail aren't using any blue power cars any more.
All are in ScotRail livery, which is blue and white/grey. I believe Journeyman was referring to the ex FGW plain Blue livery.The picture of 43030 on the other end of the set is blue!
The burnt end is the inner end, the cab end is closer to the camera in that picture of the PC. You can see that the bulkhead door visible is on the left hand side, so it must be the cab. I think a combination of muck/dust and sunlight is obscuring the colour of the paintwork. Also the grille is clearly towards the burnt end and you can see some light grey paint near there, as well as possibly the dark window ribbon.
The Montrose -Inverurie dmu 2B13 is shown passing Carmont at 0658 (on time) but was terminated at Stonehaven 07:13 or 9 minutes late.Does RealTimeTrains not give a passing time anywhere heading north?
It is the BBC though, all day they have been off the mark, The HST was a locomotive and 4 carriages, all the carriages went down the embankment, they still can't make up their mind if the train was going north or south and recently claimed that the last rail crash which involved a passenger losing their life was Ufton Nervet, the journalistic standard of the supposed Gold Standard of News output in the UK has spiralled recently
Dreadful sentence to use by the media.Absolute rubbish churned out by the BBC
On the Radio 2 news at 17.00 they said that "the driver was searching for another way through"
Ye Gods!
The report on the Ten was stirring it, suggesting that ‘questions need to be asked about whether trains should have been running at all’Absolute rubbish churned out by the BBC
On the Radio 2 news at 17.00 they said that "the driver was searching for another way through"
Ye Gods!
A tragic train driver who died in the Stonehaven rail crash has been named locally as Scots dad Brett McCullough.
A grief-stricken colleague of Brett’s said ScotRail staff were shattered to learn he had been killed in the tragedy.
The colleague said: “He has a young family and a wife. He’s been in the railways for about six years and is a lovely man.”
Brett lived less than a 15 minute drive from the site of the accident.
suggesting that ‘questions need to be asked about whether trains should have been running at all’
The driver has been named.
![]()
Train driver killed in Stonehaven crash named as Scots dad Brett McCullough
Brett tragically died alongside the train’s conductor and a passenger this morning after heavy rain caused a landslip on the track.www.dailyrecord.co.uk
My thoughts go out to his family, friends and colleagues.
The same so called expert was at it earlier as well, spouting the same stuff, so they were obviously confident it was accurate.News at 10 continued the really poor reporting. Some reporter interviewed by Sophie Raworth in the studio, firstly said the driver "asked for permission to move onto another track". Then he went on a rant about how "questions must be asked should trains have been running at all in those weather conditions".
Dreadful standard of reportage. Turned the TV off.
It is understood the locomotive and three carriages derailed and slid down an embankment
That's the chap!Was that the same guy that was suggesting that derailments usually result in fatalities?
Was that the same guy that was suggesting that derailments usually result in fatalities?
Yes "almost always result in fatalities". He's clearly decided it's an open and shut case, weather conditions were too bad for trains to run.That's the chap!
It is of course possible that it was both - we just won't know for sure until the facts are determined by the investigation.I've only just watched tonight's Channel 4 News, and in an interview with Nigel Harris he claimed that the alarm was raised by a member of the public.
Is that right? I thought it had been determined that the alarm was raised by a member of staff.
Yes "almost always result in fatalities". He's clearly decided it's an open and shut case, weather conditions were too bad for trains to run.
Literally hasn't got a clue what he's talking about. I wish they'd teach these folk that they have a moral duty to get it right, and if they don't know the first thing about a subject, STFU or find a different story to report on rather than mislead millions of people.
Was he the science editor or transport correspondent?Yes "almost always result in fatalities". He's clearly decided it's an open and shut case, weather conditions were too bad for trains to run.
Literally hasn't got a clue what he's talking about. I wish they'd teach these folk that they have a moral duty to get it right, and if they don't know the first thing about a subject, STFU or find a different story to report on rather than mislead millions of people.
My condolences to all those affected, including the poor signaller who has had to deal with this.
I've only just watched tonight's Channel 4 News, and in an interview with Nigel Harris he claimed that the alarm was raised by a member of the public.
Is that right? I thought it had been determined that the alarm was raised by a member of staff.
Scotrail HST's don't have a buffet I'm sure, but there may have been a trolley worker onboard.Could both be true (ish) i.e. it being a member of staff who was travelling as a passenger? It won't have been either of the two traincrew as they sadly did not survive. Was there a buffet steward on board or are those closed at present?