merlodlliw
Established Member
Once it starts to cover the sleepers then it's had it.
Cheers, that was my thought, I presume the breakers then shut off the power
Bob
Once it starts to cover the sleepers then it's had it.
This particular argument (whilst popular in the media) is widely discredited scientifically, If the climate were changing according to natural long term cycles, it would be getting cooler right now not warmer.And your point about climate change ....
Climate change has existed since the planet was formed, and it will keep on changing until the planet dies. There is nothing anyone can do to change that ....
Whilst I cannot attest to the UK, in Australia infrastructure was designed to handle fifty year events (that is an event like heavy rainfall that would normally occur once in every fifty years). With the advent of more obvious climate change as evidenced by the floods in eastern Australia two years running, infrastructure will now be built to meet one hundred year events.
That infrastrcuture will start coming into use over the next 10 years - going back and upgrading the existing infrastructure will be done on a case by case basis as funds become available. It will take a VERY long time!
I imagine it is the same in the UK - and I would imagine a lot of the existing infrastructure being even older than Australia's means that it was probably designed to handle even less than a fifty year event.
That was not E* but Thameslink - and the type of snow was virtually unprecedented in this country, consisting effectively not of snow but minute hailstones. It was not so much that the industry blamed the wrong phenomenon (think also of "Leaves on the line", perfectly reasonable), but that communication was handled either by on-site engineers/managers who were not trained in briefing media, or by people like those in the following clip.the wrong type of snow (E*),....
There are some roads closed (including a stretch of the A1)
How much water can a train pass through and what stops a train from passing through flood water?
How much water can a train pass through and what stops a train from passing through flood water?
The following criteria (rules taken from RSSB Rule Book) comes into play during flooding
i) Up to the bottom of the rail head normal working.
ii) Up to the top of the rail head maximum speed 5 mph.
iii) Above the top of the rail head movements only permitted by instructions from Operations Control.
However, at any depth if flood water is moving and likely to dislodge the ballast or has dislodged ballast, trains must be stopped and wait for further instructions from Operations Control.
Worst observation: new segregated routes over the footbridge at Chester.
Clumsily done and another affront to the station's heritage.
Includes two extra sets of steps for the infirm to negotiate.
The footbridge alterations are not going to stay long term but are part of a plan for allowing the bridge to remain in use while the refurbishment takes place. The blue steps are a sturdy short term addition. The plans for the bridge show a great improvement with the removal of the tin sides and excrement.
The following criteria (rules taken from RSSB Rule Book) comes into play during flooding
i) Up to the bottom of the rail head normal working.
ii) Up to the top of the rail head maximum speed 5 mph.
iii) Above the top of the rail head movements only permitted by instructions from Operations Control.
However, at any depth if flood water is moving and likely to dislodge the ballast or has dislodged ballast, trains must be stopped and wait for further instructions from Operations Control.
One question about the recent floods how long is it usually before passengers are de-trained in a flood situation or do they actually have to stop on the train, just something I was thinking about while sat at the red signal