• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What are the provisions in place to stop steam trains entering enclosed areas?

Status
Not open for further replies.

NightatLaira

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2010
Messages
490
What are the provisions in place to stop steam trains entering enclosed areas?

With the profusion of steam charters about the place these days in the summer I imagine the scenes could be quite chaotic if an engine in full steam was accidentally diverted into an enclosed station such as the Merseyrail tunnels, Birmingham New Street or Heathrow for instance?

Has anything like this ever happened? Would it set-off the fire alarms?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

First class

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Messages
2,731
It simply wouldn't fit into the Merseyrail tunnels.

An interesting fact is that there is no smoke detectors on the Merseyrail underground platforms. The way in which fire is detected is by CCTV in the 24/7 manned control room based remotely at Sandhills IECC. When the MPV comes through LVC it absolutely stinks of diesel fumes but nothing happens.
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
I think that shows why somebody invented condensing gear. It's a pity they couldn't get the N2 working and certified in time to return to Moorgate via the Widened Lines. Not much clag with the condensers on, but I bet it would have been noisy.

Still, that brings me onto something else, what about diesels in enclosed stations (Queen St LL for instance). How do they prevent problems with that?
 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Still, that brings me onto something else, what about diesels in enclosed stations (Queen St LL for instance). How do they prevent problems with that?

Grand Central had problems with the fire alarms at Sunderland with the HSTs. They got around the problem IIRC by having only one power car running in the station, but someone will have a definite answer.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
There aren't any regular diesel services through Queen Street LL as far as I'm aware? It also isn't that enclosed- it's a big wide space, and open at the ends- you can see how far apart the lines are here. The only diesels I'd have thought would be engineering trains- shouldn't be too hard to arrange to stop them with the loco "outside"?

The Argyle line, through Glasgow Central Low Level, is rather more "Underground"
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
At City Thameslink, they have extractor fans which as it's a Underground station have to switch on if any diesels come though be weed spraying or engineering trains.
 

NightatLaira

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2010
Messages
490
There aren't any regular diesel services through Queen Street LL as far as I'm aware? It also isn't that enclosed- it's a big wide space, and open at the ends- you can see how far apart the lines are here. The only diesels I'd have thought would be engineering trains- shouldn't be too hard to arrange to stop them with the loco "outside"?

The Argyle line, through Glasgow Central Low Level, is rather more "Underground"

Deerstalker quite frequently goes through Glasgow Queen Street Low Level on diversion with a 67 so I believe...
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
At City Thameslink, they have extractor fans which as it's a Underground station have to switch on if any diesels come though be weed spraying or engineering trains.

That's not quite right. You isolate the fire alarm system on the platform areas and put the extractor fans on to stop any diesels flumes remaining in the station.

Because of this NR give the station staff advanced warning of any diesel workings to ensure smooth running.
 

33056

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2007
Messages
2,416
Location
On a train somewhere in Europe
All steam charters and ECS moves appear on a special notice which will detail any route or other restrictions. For example, IIRC, when 6201 worked into Euston last month, I think the instructions were that it was to stop at the "HST STOP" board.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
It simply wouldn't fit into the Merseyrail tunnels.

An interesting fact is that there is no smoke detectors on the Merseyrail underground platforms. The way in which fire is detected is by CCTV in the 24/7 manned control room based remotely at Sandhills IECC. When the MPV comes through LVC it absolutely stinks of diesel fumes but nothing happens.

No infrared heat sensors either?
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
There aren't any regular diesel services through Queen Street LL as far as I'm aware? It also isn't that enclosed- it's a big wide space, and open at the ends- you can see how far apart the lines are here. The only diesels I'd have thought would be engineering trains- shouldn't be too hard to arrange to stop them with the loco "outside"?

The Argyle line, through Glasgow Central Low Level, is rather more "Underground"

Thanks for posting the link. For all the years I worked in Weegieland and have used Queen Street (HL) hadn't realised that LL was "open-air" to either side of the station. Was the route built as "cut&cover" under West Regent Street & Kent Road? I haven't spotted any ventilation ducts along the path.
 
Last edited:

NightatLaira

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2010
Messages
490
I think it may have been... but perhaps it's not ventilated.

At the time of building I'm fairly sure steam would still have been in existence. i've also seen an EWS 66 go through on its own at GC LL.
 

O L Leigh

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2006
Messages
5,611
Location
In the cab with the paper
It's all down to the rules of the route. Certain types of traction are not allowed in certain areas, and so the signaller will route them accordingly. All of these workings will appear in the notices and amended workings, showing which platforms of which stations they will use and what routes they will take.

Some stations are classed as "sub-surface" and, while they aren't barred from accepting things like diesel traction, there are certain local instructions to be observed. Therefore, any diesel train entering the east side of Liverpool Street or platforms 1 or 3 at Stansted Airport must be shut down on arrival and only re-started just prior to departure. Through stations are less problematic though, as the dwell times are shorter.

Steam traction is a bit more problematic because you can't just shut down a "kettle". Therefore this type of traction is banned from operating into certain locations. Likewise it is often banned from operating over certain sections of route if it is likely to cause operational problems. For example, any steam train leaving Liverpool Street and taking the West Anglia route must be routed via Stratford and the Temple Mills line because of the tight clearances in the Clapton tunnels and the history of steam locos causing the overheads to trip out because of the carbon rich exhaust and steam they give off.

O L Leigh
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
Re: Glasgow Queen Street
Was the route built as "cut&cover" under West Regent Street & Kent Road? I haven't spotted any ventilation ducts along the path.
Yes, it was.

It was originally built as the Glasgow City and District Railway Line and operated by the North British Railway Company and while people often refer to the Glasgow Subway as being older than the London Underground, the Queen Street Low Level was operating even before the Subway.
The Low level station used to have four platforms (when you see how wide the platforms are at present you can see how easily more could have been accommodated.
I believe that it was originally operated by steam hauled trains which took electric power from a third rail purely for carriage lighting. I'd be interested to hear if anyone knows any more about that unusual powering arrangement; it sounds very unusual.
Steam wasn't replaced by electric trains in there until around 1960, so it must have been a smoky and smelly place (but what industrial cities weren't back then?
 
Last edited:

12CSVT

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2010
Messages
2,612
Here's a curiosity. Class 171s are banned from Victoria station apparantly because of exhaust fumes, yet when the class 205/207 'Thumper' units were still in service, they were diagrammed to work in an out of Victoria on a daily basis until May 2004.
 

O L Leigh

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2006
Messages
5,611
Location
In the cab with the paper
It's probably due to the difference between the eastern (Continental) side of the station and the western side. Victoria is much like Liv St in that it is effectively divided into two stations with very different characteristics.

There is a problem with running diesels into the more confined western side because it looks like it would be classified as a "sub-surface" station whereas the eastern side is much more open and airy. If this is the case, I imagine that Victoria has similar arrangements to Liv St in that diesel services are not specifically banned from the "sub-surface" platforms, but that the train must be shut down on arrival and only restarted just prior to departure to avoid the exhaust setting off the fire alarms. This is why NXEA Cl170's are almost always routed into the more open west side of Liv St.

The reason why the Thumpers would have been fine is because they worked the south-eastern division and would almost have certainly used the eastern side of Victoria. Since the reorganisation of the divisions and the move of these services to the south-central division (Southern), Cl171's would be more likely to be routed into the western side. If this is the case, it would appear that Southern have simply made a pragmatic decision to route these units elsewhere rather than have the aggravation of shutting these units down on arrival each time.

O L Leigh
 

hello

Member
Joined
10 Jun 2008
Messages
225
thumpers going into victoria on the central side, could be routed into platforms 18 and 19, where if you look when you are there, there are extractor fans directly above where the thumpers exhausts would have been. 171 exhausts are in a completely different place to where the thumpers were, hence why they are not permitted
 

O L Leigh

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2006
Messages
5,611
Location
In the cab with the paper
Could someone with the relevant sectional appendix or with a working knowledge of the local instructions at Victoria please confirm if there is an outright ban on these units?

As I said before, it should be possible to work them into a confined space such as the west side of Victoria provided they are shut down on arrival, whether there are extractor fans or not.

O L Leigh
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top