• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Low Speed Derailment Sheffield 11/11

Status
Not open for further replies.

Amlag

Member
Joined
8 Jul 2018
Messages
232
The key bit (for prosperity) being

You can be fairly sure in the current unjoined up railway that the NR Media Centre is manned by Contractor's people not directly employed by NR, and their knowledge could well be lacking on specifics.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,259
Location
Yorkshire
But this isn't an instantaneous process. They can't get a phone call at say 9am asking for their buses as replacement transport and have their drivers unfurloughed and back in work by 10.
Getting staff back in can, I believe, be an instaneous process. The furlough claims go in after the fact so it is only the HMRC reporting at the end of the period that changes. Whether it is practical to phone a staff member to get them in within the hour is quite another matter entirely, but furlough in of itself isn't an excuse
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
You can be fairly sure in the current unjoined up railway that the NR Media Centre is manned by Contractor's people not directly employed by NR, and their knowledge could well be lacking on specifics.

Or they are simply just putting it in plain, non-technical terms.
 

stuartl

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2014
Messages
172
Given that they refer to carriages and cars within some 3 words of each other, I'd wager more on the side of confused media teams
Or just someone working from home, maybe not doing their normal job because of covid, and made a mistake. As we all do from time to time, except for some people on the Internet of course.
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
4,985
66603 6E91 34 Loaded PCA'S reports of at least 1 wagon on its side with lots of infrastructure damage.

All Crosscountry services terminating at Derby and Leeds.
Were the Leeds terminators doing quick turn arounds and heading back to the north? I cannot imagine Leeds having the capacity for them to be stood at the platform for any length of time.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,866
Location
Yorkshire
Signalling limitations I believe.
It’s 0E08 but can’t see what’s on it at the moment.

I don't think that Platform 6 has a northbound main aspect for passenger departures.

That’s correct no northbound main aspect signal on platform 6
Ah forgot about that one.

In which case northbound on P8 and southbound on P6 should be possible.

Also, another Class 6 leaving, presumably returning some more wagons, this time back to Hope:

 

SilentGrade

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
135
You can be fairly sure in the current unjoined up railway that the NR Media Centre is manned by Contractor's people not directly employed by NR, and their knowledge could well be lacking on specifics.
You can be fairly sure that you’re completely wrong
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
3,574
Were the Leeds terminators doing quick turn arounds and heading back to the north? I cannot imagine Leeds having the capacity for them to be stood at the platform for any length of time.
That status of them terminating at Leeds only applied first thing, they started running through again after a few hours
 

Bob figgis

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2020
Messages
118
Location
Tinsley TMD
Last edited:

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,866
Location
Yorkshire
From this YouTube video, it ran through the through road and not P1

It is even clearer on the local BBC news report. Skip forward to 16:06 into the programme

I know, in my post I said the through roads between p1 and p2. There’s some more through roads between p5 and p6 hence why I made reference to p1 and p2.
 

Bob figgis

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2020
Messages
118
Location
Tinsley TMD
I know, in my post I said the through roads between p1 and p2. There’s some more through roads between p5 and p6 hence why I made reference to p1 and p2.
Yes it used the through roads between p1 and p2. They do look very ropey and in need of TLC. I quoted your post as you had made mention of their poor state. Looks like you hit the nail on the head. My local not being shown to its full glory.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,866
Location
Yorkshire
Yes it used the through roads between p1 and p2. They do look very ropey and in need of TLC. I quoted your post as you had made mention of their poor state. Looks like you hit the nail on the head. My local not being shown to its full glory.

Ahh fair enough. Yeah it’s been like that for a good while now, but you’d think they’d up the quality a bit as one end of the TR is used by regular passenger trains every hour with the other used fairly regularly by freights
 

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
1,013
I don't think that Platform 6 has a northbound main aspect for passenger departures.
Correct. Nor does platform 8. It shows Red all the time and can only clear as a sub going north. We call it a 'wall side movement'. Permission has to be sought for passenger trains to leave north from 6 or 8 because of Ground Position Light on 6 or Sub on platform 8s S139.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,972
I don't think that Platform 6 has a northbound main aspect for passenger departures.

That’s correct no northbound main aspect signal on platform 6

But can head north to south from Meadowhall towards Dore / Chesterfield via Platform 6.

When was Sheffield PSB closed and its work moved to York ROC? In the last year or so. Cross Country avoided Sheffield then I'm sure.

Correct. Nor does platform 8. It shows Red all the time and can only clear as a sub going north. We call it a 'wall side movement'. Permission has to be sought for passenger trains to leave north from 6 or 8 because of Ground Position Light on 6 or Sub on platform 8s S139.

Extremely surprised they didn't resignal it to full aspects when moved to York ROC.
 

Philip

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2007
Messages
3,656
Location
Manchester
Isn't the line through Beighton and Treeton a slow crawl? I guess CC don't want to use it because of the effect on journey times.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
16,180
Location
East Anglia
When was Sheffield PSB closed and its work moved to York ROC? In the last year or so. Cross Country avoided Sheffield then I'm sure.

Any route knowledge may well have expired by now I suppose. Cant use route conductors either.
Not sure how I managed to merge that :s
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
To be fair to Cross Country on the route knowledge point, in recent years I have been most impressed at their ability to keep services on the move around Whitacre, Castle Donington, the Erewash Valley, Beighton, Woodburn, Thyburgh, Barnsley and Hare Park as needed during engineering work, flooding, failures and so forth.

Beighton-Masborough is by far the least useful diversion because it obviously means completely missing out Sheffield. As such it cannot be done by 'route retainer' passenger services at the fringes of the day.

I can't say that I ever remember being diverted via the full length of the 'Old Road' in BR's day (although I did go that way on an excursion from the West Midlands to Scarborough once).

This is worth repeating.

Whilst the incident is obviously regrettable (and has had big impacts upon services in the region), I think that some things are a lot more complicated than a number of posts on here have suggested - it's really not as straightforward as rounding up dozens of Rail Replacement coaches at short notice or getting a critical mass of XC staff regularly trained to cover every possible diversionary route (the fact that the Old Road was used a few years ago doesn't mean that the route knowledge would be up to date, and running one train a day that avoids the city of Sheffield would only keep a small minority of XC staff up to date with their route knowledge).

There's no easy solutions for Sheffield - it's a congested station with "sub-optimal" throats (e.g. there's a single lead to the two bay platforms at the northern end, the painful slow approach speeds to a number of platfoms) - the situation with the signals (that means you can't use the two through platforms on the eastern island for northbound services) seems rather unfortunate... but that's how things are, we have to deal with the realities of that in the short term.

It's funny how "resilience" gets trotted our as a justification for building some long scenic line through the middle of nowhere (just in case it can be a diversionary route a couple of weekends a year) but there's no urgency/enthusiasm for something comparatively modest like permitting a through platform to be bi-directional.

But this is the mess of Sheffield Midland - it struggles to cope with the (pre Covid) service patterns - there's no scope to expand a station built directly above a flood prone river (hemmed in by the ring road to the west and steep hill to the east) - it's been so busy that a number of London services had to run up to Woodburn just to dump them out of the way - yet this station where through platforms are at a premium is where we hope to squeeze long HS2 trains.

For all the talk about re-opening the Bakewell line to accommodate Peak District freight, there's no other route for a Hope - Dewsbury service - and no simple solutions for Midland - my understanding is that the buildings on the two "islands" have some listing, so you can't tear it down and start again, however tempting!
 

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
1,013
But can head north to south from Meadowhall towards Dore / Chesterfield via Platform 6.

When was Sheffield PSB closed and its work moved to York ROC? In the last year or so. Cross Country avoided Sheffield then I'm sure.



Extremely surprised they didn't resignal it to full aspects when moved to York ROC.
Yeah south through 6 definitely under main aspects. Everything at York is exactly as it was at Sheffield PSB. It was just a re-control, not re-signalling. We shut in May 2016.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
2,892
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
This is worth repeating.
[SNIP]
There's no easy solutions for Sheffield - it's a congested station with "sub-optimal" throats...[SNIP]

But this is the mess of Sheffield Midland - it struggles to cope with the (pre Covid) service patterns - there's no scope to expand a station built directly above a flood prone river (hemmed in by the ring road to the west and steep hill to the east) - it's been so busy that a number of London services had to run up to Woodburn just to dump them out of the way - yet this station where through platforms are at a premium is where we hope to squeeze long HS2 trains.
Most informative, thanks.

Ideally forward for the attention of those deciding on the HS2 route North of Birmingham!
 

ALEMASTER

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2011
Messages
335
Travel South Yorkshire have warned of bus diversions due to the road in front of Sheffield station being partially closed for a crane to be set up to recover the derailed wagons tomorrow (Thursday).

National Rail Enquiries service updates page suggesting train service disruption will continue until Friday.

NRES also suggesting another platform may be made usable overnight tonight to the benefit of EMR.

Looks like probably same service tomorrow as today:
EMR Sheffield-London: one an hour running as normal with the other train per hour starting at Derby.
EMR Liverpool-Norwich: normal
TPE Manchester-Cleethorpes: normal with delays, SLW through north end of Sheffield station
XC North East-South West: normal with delays, SLW through north end of Sheffield station
NORTHERN Leeds-Barnsley-Nottingham: normal with delays, SLW through north end of Sheffield station
NORTHERN Leeds-Barnsley-Sheffield (locals): terminating Meadowhall, Supertram accepting tickets Meadowhall-Sheffield
NORTHERN Huddersfield-Barnsley-Sheffield: terminating Barnsley
NORTHERN Leeds-Rotherham-Sheffield (locals): terminating Meadowhall, Supertram accepting tickets Rotherham Central/Meadowhall-Sheffield.
NORTHERN Doncaster-Rotherham-Sheffield (locals): Replacement bus all stations Doncaster-Meadowhall, Supertram accepting tickets Rotherham Central/Meadowhall-Sheffield.
NORTHERN York-Pontefract-Sheffield: suspended, alternative routes/services available.
NORTHERN Scarborough-Hull-Doncaster-Sheffield: terminating Doncaster, alternative services available.
NORTHERN Lincoln-Retford-Worksop-Sheffield: replaced by buses
NORTHERN Sheffield-Manchester: operating normally

Most informative, thanks.

Ideally forward for the attention of those deciding on the HS2 route North of Birmingham!
the plan apparently with the HS2 line not actually going into Sheffield was for some HS2 services to divert onto the classic line Clay Cross-Chesterfield-Dronfield-Sheffield and local services kicked out of Sheffield station to make room for them, with the local services replaced by tram trains.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,980
Location
Sheffield
For all the talk about re-opening the Bakewell line to accommodate Peak District freight, there's no other route for a Hope - Dewsbury service - and no simple solutions for Midland - my understanding is that the buildings on the two "islands" have some listing, so you can't tear it down and start again, however tempting!
This incident should remind us how vulnerable the railway is to incidents at critical points. Places like this need solutions before we start throwing cash at reopening long closed lines. Like at Castlefield the restricted geography dictates very expensive options. Like in Manchester some very extensive civil engineering is the only way to bring relief. River below, road to one side, tram and hill to the other - and a mockingly close railway heading across at too acute an angle to make a connection towards Penistone. Some sort of tunnelled tracks below Park Hill may be needed.

However, returning to today's incident it's strange that during the day time cement trains roll through Platform 1 in a shower of dust when there are lots of passengers waiting. I've wondered why they didn't use the central roads, but thought it might be due to the apparently poor standard of the track at the north end. Maybe that had a bearing today, but why use that route at night? Possibly passenger trains stabled in Platform 1 for the night?
 

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
1,013
This incident should remind us how vulnerable the railway is to incidents at critical points. Places like this need solutions before we start throwing cash at reopening long closed lines. Like at Castlefield the restricted geography dictates very expensive options. Like in Manchester some very extensive civil engineering is the only way to bring relief. River below, road to one side, tram and hill to the other - and a mockingly close railway heading across at too acute an angle to make a connection towards Penistone. Some sort of tunnelled tracks below Park Hill may be needed.

However, returning to today's incident it's strange that during the day time cement trains roll through Platform 1 in a shower of dust when there are lots of passengers waiting. I've wondered why they didn't use the central roads, but thought it might be due to the apparently poor standard of the track at the north end. Maybe that had a bearing today, but why use that route at night? Possibly passenger trains stabled in Platform 1 for the night?
Platform 1, is a main running Line.
The Through Line is a main running line, but with an additional signal that leads into the very north end of Platform 1, so is not a true Through Line, and the Signalling Overlaps prevent it from being a more useful route than Platform 1. The next 'through' route, along side the Through Line, is the Down Station Siding, no main apect signals and a very slow 'through' route (though sometimes useful). It is worth nothing that there is no preference for getting a freight through Sheffield. Its more a case of send it where its free. Not many freights, especially North Bound can fit in the station limits, so usually keep going. So, whilst they appear as Through Routes, they are not all main aspect signals. The Down Station Siding (between the through line and platform 2, and Up Station Sidings 1&2, between 5 and 6 are all signalled on GPLs)
There is no Signalling Restrictions based on condition of track. On a night time/early hours a lot of freight uses the sidings because they can be the only through route while shunting is taking place with all the Northern Units.
 
Last edited:

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,173
From this YouTube video, it ran through the through road and not P1
Quite nicely done for a completely amateur video effort.

However, having seen some rapid derailment recovery in the USA, way out in the middle of nowhere, what the video does show is that at what must be 8 hours or more after the incident, there is not one single piece of mechanical recovery equipment yet around, not even for the lesser derailed vehicles or just arrived on a low loader on the road outside. There are several groups seen walking around trackside in immaculate hi-viz, doubtless all saying "Ooooh, nasty" to one another, but of recovery actually in progress, zilch.

And now we read it needs to be done by cranes from the street, and will take days. Has nobody ever seen that tracked lifting gear that USA and elsewhere get to site and get on with it?
 

Trainfan2019

Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
452
Whilst keeping checking the Sheffield live train map on traksy after the derailment there are some odd codes showing at the platforms. What does T3, Poss, Unit and Ne2u mean please? Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top