• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Are there any true non-stop expresses left in the UK?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ken H

On Moderation
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,355
Location
N Yorks
Yes, and in the other direction (which I caught by mistake on a Sunday evening once, with no way of getting back to my intended station!).
the 'Leeds Executive' had one stop to pick up only at Wakefield westgate. think one from KX about 4pm was set down only at wakefield

used to be quite a lot of 's' and 'u' in the all line timetable in the 70's.
how they stopped abuse I dont know.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,204
I dunno, it's only a 50 minute run, I'd imagine you will find others around the South East, where practice is almost universally to operate services like "fast to X then all stations to Y" because the game is maximising capacity/speed to London rather than connectivity?
In the process of travelling between (e.g.) Deal and St Johns without doubling back you can catch three different trains terminating at Charing Cross, each progressively slower than the last. Does that make the first one a "Sevenoaks Express" and the second a "Hither Green Express", I wonder?
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,946
Location
Wilmslow
used to be quite a lot of 's' and 'u' in the all line timetable in the 70's.
how they stopped abuse I dont know.
The 'u' were ineffectual to people in the know (the 17:12 Manchester-Euston called at Macclesfield at 17u35 and was probably the busiest commuter service in that direction between those points), but the 's' were sensible in allowing long-distance trains to leave early if they ran early. So there were non-stop trains Euston-Wilmslow which didn't have to 'wait time' at Wilmslow, but nobody tried to stop you boarding either.
 

Doctor Fegg

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2010
Messages
1,853
There is of course, in non-Covid times, a very regular 2hr15 non-stop run from a London terminal. Not all of it is "in the UK" though!
 

sjm77

Member
Joined
8 Jan 2020
Messages
204
Location
Manchester
i say: no, not in the style of them olden days. There may be more long distance non stop running say Crewe > Euston/York > Kings Cross than in the olden days.
I would agree, especially from York to KX. Even today a couple of XX:00 departures (Pre-Covid) from Kings Cross stop at Peterborough breaking the standard hourly pattern, but nothing Southbound on the Edinburgh Fasts.
The 90s Royal Scot was Preston, Oxenholme & Carlisle. More recently Virgin had the 16:30 off Euston which I think was Preston and Carlisle only.
Virgin's 16:30 off Euston was Preston only.
 

Cheshire Scot

Established Member
Joined
24 Jul 2020
Messages
1,348
Location
North East Cheshire
In the past the Royal Scot used to call at Preston only, I think. Did one ever run non-stop from Glasgow to London?
In the early sixties the Royal Scot only called at Carlisle, around five and a half hours on the long non-stop section, then electrification started and a call at Crewe was added where the traction changed and changed to Preston only with full electrification in 1974. Over the years other stops have been added and taken out.
In the same era the Flying Scotsman at the traditional 10.00 departure time called Newcastle only, just under 4 hours non stop, and the Night Scotsman non stop in the public timetable in both directions between Edinburgh and Kings Cross, but would in reality have at least one, possibly two or more stops for crew changes en route - on the west side the Night Limited called only at Motherwell but again would have had stops for crew changes. .
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,261
In normal times there’s an express non-stop from Waterloo to the region’s biggest city. Cheap too.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,968
Cool. Do I win a prize for that then?
No because it doesn't fit the OP's criteria. The Cambridge services all run to Ely or Kings Lynn so are not "true non-stop expresses" even if they are fast from Kings Cross to Cambridge.
 
Joined
31 Jan 2020
Messages
345
Location
Inverness
Does it really matter as much now? Stops are a lot shorter, trains accelerate a lot faster. The advantages of a non-stop train don't quite stack up anymore.
 

superalbs

Established Member
Joined
3 Jul 2014
Messages
2,487
Location
Exeter
There were non-stop London Paris runs, and also non-stop London Brussels runs (which continued to Amsterdam).

Although, these services are more French in style, where running non-stop for a long time is quite common.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,946
Location
Wilmslow
Does it really matter as much now? Stops are a lot shorter, trains accelerate a lot faster. The advantages of a non-stop train don't quite stack up anymore.
True, but there are other reasons too.
Firstly, the "headline" two hour Manchester-London time, which some people like to make something of, for example, only possible with a non-stop Stockport-London run.
Secondly because in the past I've been on this train and it's left Stockport pretty much full. So there's a train ten minutes behind which deals with the passengers from Macclesfield and Stoke.
 

LucyP

On Moderation
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
123
Doesn't the non-stop Kings Cross to York LNER Azuma service count? It is timetabled to take 1 hour 50 minutes. The non-stop Class 91 on the same journey in the early 1990s was timetabled at 1 hour 46 minutes. So much for progress!
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,968
Doesn't the non-stop Kings Cross to York LNER Azuma service count? It is timetabled to take 1 hour 50 minutes. The non-stop Class 91 on the same journey in the early 1990s was timetabled at 1 hour 46 minutes. So much for progress!
No, not under the original criteria because none of the trains which are non-stop to York terminate there. They aren't non-stop express trains to Edinburgh.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,261
Doesn't the non-stop Kings Cross to York LNER Azuma service count? It is timetabled to take 1 hour 50 minutes. The non-stop Class 91 on the same journey in the early 1990s was timetabled at 1 hour 46 minutes. So much for progress!

To pick up the point about ‘progress’:

1) the Azumas are still scheduled in the running times of Class91s
2) there are a lot more trains on the ECML now, and the fast services to York have ‘pathing time’ added to thread them through the other trains on this busier railway
3) in my time traveling London - York on non-stop services, 1h46 was a case of hope over experience.
 

Cherry_Picker

Established Member
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,797
Location
Birmingham

This post from 2016 had the longest non stop run from each TOC in that particular timetable. COVID timetables have probably made updating it right now a little pointless but it’s good for a rough idea.
 

gg1

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2011
Messages
1,919
Location
Birmingham
Yes, the 07:30 Birmingham New Street - London Euston used to be non-stop. Was my regular commute at one point a few years ago. Often caught out the odd passenger wanting Coventry.
Although depending on how you define non-stop it may not count as it called at Wolverhampton and Sandwell & Dudley before New Street. About a third of them used to end up calling at International and Coventry anyway though, used to travel on this service once or twice a month pre COVID.
 

LucyP

On Moderation
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
123
So it's all a lie - new trains, shorter journey times, faster acceleration. All nonsense, because they travel to the same timetable and therefore speeds as the clapped out old trains from 30 years ago!
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,261
So it's all a lie - new trains, shorter journey times, faster acceleration. All nonsense, because they travel to the same timetable and therefore speeds as the clapped out old trains from 30 years ago!

It will come...
 

Cherry_Picker

Established Member
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,797
Location
Birmingham
So it's all a lie - new trains, shorter journey times, faster acceleration. All nonsense, because they travel to the same timetable and therefore speeds as the clapped out old trains from 30 years ago!

It's standard procedure even with out COVID that the new rolling stock will run to the old timetable for a while before changes get made, you don't want to change everything at once or it's much more likely to go wrong. Shorter journey times can be between two intermediate points on a journey and new stops can be added without a time penalty resulting in more frequent connections at stations which were previously underserved.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,862
Location
Yorkshire

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,807
Location
Herts
Long way from the days of Brighton - "on the hour , in the hour, every hour" . That was the pre-and post war Southern Electric. Few minor developments in the patch since then , like a minor airport grown a bit.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Does the Cambridge cruiser still run in these times non stop?

Does time denote what is or isn't an express?

Non stop between start and finish is what should be the only criteria I reckon

Sunday morning sees one train start at Cambridge and run non-stop (https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/L21939/2020-12-13). Everything after starts from King's Lynn.

The Down one I got back on Sunday afternoon (albeit continuing to King's Lynn) managed an impressive 78mph average speed from King's Cross to Cambridge....
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
2,509
Even in steam days some of the allegedly non-stop expresses were a little disingenuous. The down Cornish Riviera had multiple slip coaches to intermediate stops, and then stopped on a non-platform line at Newton Abbot to attach a pilot locomotive (inside the train engine of course, so it took twice as long!) and then if not booked to call at Plymouth in the summer months the locos were changed at St Budeaux or somewhere similar as the GWR King with its double-red restriction couldn’t cross the Royal Albert Bridge. And yet this train was on occasion advertised first stop Gwinear Road, or even St Erth.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
4,013
Location
Hope Valley
Back in 1974, just after 'The Clansman' had been introduced, providing, I believe, the first ever regular Inverness-London daytime train, I travelled on it from the origin. There was a virtually brand new First Class compartment vehicle (BFK?) that was de-classified and I looked forward to a delightful trip to London in a forward-facing window seat. An elderly lady entered the compartment and asked if this was the "through train to London". I assured her that it was.

We set off at 1030 and made the booked call at Aviemore at 1123. At this point the lady became immensely distressed and asked me why the train had stopped. I noted that it was a booked call. "But British Railways told me that it was a through train to London," my companion wailed. I explained that "through" didn't necessarily mean the same as "non-stop". The lady then spent the next 20 minutes complaining about British Railways until we stopped at Newtonmore at 1143 at which point a similar conversation took place.

This litany of complaint and distress was then repeated at and between Pitlochry, Perth, Stirling, Coatbridge Central, Mossend Yard (where the diesel locomotive was exchanged for an electric), Motherwell, Carlisle, Preston, Crewe, Wolverhampton, Birmingham New Street and Coventry until we finally pulled in to Euston on time at 2104. During the journey stewards from the refreshment vehicle had served regular meals to the lady at her seat in order to avoid the need for her to walk to the restaurant.

Her final words as we separated at Euston (where a porter was waiting with a wheelchair) were, "Well I think it's disgusting, British Railways told me that it was going to be a through train."

Some people are hard to please.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,847
Location
Glasgow
In the past the Royal Scot used to call at Preston only, I think. Did one ever run non-stop from Glasgow to London?
Not since pre-war steam days and even then it made a crew stop outside Carlisle as the LMS didn't do corridor tenders.
 

Bigman

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2011
Messages
297
Location
Leeds
Wasn't that Leeds to Kings Cross non-stop branded as the Leeds Executive back in those days?
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,194
Location
Airedale
Even in steam days some of the allegedly non-stop expresses were a little disingenuous. The down Cornish Riviera had multiple slip coaches to intermediate stops, and then stopped on a non-platform line at Newton Abbot to attach a pilot locomotive (inside the train engine of course, so it took twice as long!) and then if not booked to call at Plymouth in the summer months the locos were changed at St Budeaux or somewhere similar as the GWR King with its double-red restriction couldn’t cross the Royal Albert Bridge. And yet this train was on occasion advertised first stop Gwinear Road, or even St Erth.
The Riviera on summer Saturdays changed its King for a pair of Castles (or whatever) at Newton.
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
In which case all aboard the Stourbridge Shuttle Express! :)
Good point. But I guess it's not city to city.

No because it doesn't fit the OP's criteria. The Cambridge services all run to Ely or Kings Lynn so are not "true non-stop expresses" even if they are fast from Kings Cross to Cambridge.
I get that bletchlyite pointed that out,however one poster has shown one service that does so win win
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top